liskddksil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-26-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. ignore this fact at your own peril |
|
Countless Republicans such as the undecided voter on CNN after the Republican debate, said that they would vote for Edwards if nominated and noone else. He appeals to Independents, Democrats and Disgruntled republicans, because he speaks with conviction and is not beholden to the corporate interests that have ruined this country.
|
| -Edwards agrees with voter: Hillary is not electable |
maximusveritas |
Dec-26-07 05:41 PM |
#0 |
 -
Johnny probably speaks the truth |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-26-07 05:43 PM |
#1 |
 -
how big of you |
sniffa |
Dec-26-07 05:44 PM |
#2 |
 -
I have news- Obama isn't electable either |
depakid |
Dec-26-07 06:12 PM |
#22 |
| -
polling in third consistently |
ccpup |
Dec-26-07 05:44 PM |
#3 |
| -
Exactly!!! He and his wife have turned into huge disappointments for me. |
journalist3072 |
Dec-26-07 05:46 PM |
#5 |
| -
In the general election polls, he does far better than Hillary and better |
GOPBasher |
Dec-26-07 05:57 PM |
#10 |
| -
It is pretty laughable. He is so delusional |
durrrty libby |
Dec-26-07 06:01 PM |
#17 |
| -
Frankly, he's less electable than Hillary |
Onlooker |
Dec-26-07 05:45 PM |
#4 |
| -
Hillary couldn't carry her REAL home state |
silverojo |
Dec-26-07 07:55 PM |
#35 |
| -
Then why is Sen. Clinton currently polling ahead of John Edwards in his home state of North Carolina |
journalist3072 |
Dec-26-07 05:47 PM |
#6 |
| -
No candidate should be saying that about another candidate |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-26-07 05:48 PM |
#7 |
| -
Quite frankly, Tim Russert WANTS us to nominate the LEAST electable candidate |
earthlover |
Dec-26-07 06:12 PM |
#21 |
| -
Tell that to Bill and Hill |
Armstead |
Dec-26-07 06:58 PM |
#30 |
| -
Who did Bill and Hill (as you call them) |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-26-07 07:07 PM |
#31 |
| -
She is the least electable frontrunner. I would actually put Biden ahead of her. nm |
TeamJordan23 |
Dec-26-07 05:48 PM |
#8 |
| -
I'm SHOCKED |
ccpup |
Dec-26-07 05:53 PM |
#9 |
| -
if she does somehow get the nod, it's not a win for anyone |
sniffa |
Dec-26-07 05:58 PM |
#13 |
| -
I don't believe she'll lose the GE |
ccpup |
Dec-26-07 06:00 PM |
#15 |
| -
when i play role playing games like D&D or the like, i know it's fantasy |
sniffa |
Dec-26-07 06:03 PM |
#18 |
| -
according to the National Polls |
ccpup |
Dec-26-07 06:20 PM |
#25 |
| -
again, you'll sleep in the bed you made |
sniffa |
Dec-26-07 06:22 PM |
#28 |
| -
You mean in 2013? |
Heywoodj |
Dec-27-07 12:39 PM |
#38 |
| -
why is Hillary struggling against GOPers in all the recent matchup polls? |
TeamJordan23 |
Dec-26-07 05:59 PM |
#14 |
| -
this is a race |
ccpup |
Dec-26-07 07:10 PM |
#32 |
| -
Biden is the most electable candidate in the general election.... |
earthlover |
Dec-26-07 06:14 PM |
#23 |
| -
This is true. We're about to nominate the least electable candidate AGAIN! n/t |
GOPBasher |
Dec-26-07 05:57 PM |
#11 |
| -
If you were playing third fiddle to her , wouldn't you say the same? |
William769 |
Dec-26-07 05:58 PM |
#12 |
| -
I didn't know John Edwards could play the fiddle! |
ccpup |
Dec-26-07 06:01 PM |
#16 |
| -
Edwards probably does not want to distract from his focus -- the issues. |
JDPriestly |
Dec-26-07 06:03 PM |
#19 |
| -
Kind of ironic that the loser from 2004... |
SaveElmer |
Dec-26-07 06:10 PM |
#20 |
| -
Can't blame him for that. It was Kerry who lost |
maximusveritas |
Dec-26-07 06:37 PM |
#29 |
| -
Though Kerry soundly beat Edwards in the primary |
karynnj |
Dec-27-07 03:32 PM |
#43 |
| -
He was not the least popular in Nov 2004 |
karynnj |
Dec-27-07 03:30 PM |
#42 |
| -
ignore this fact at your own peril |
liskddksil |
Dec-26-07 06:14 PM |
#24 |
| -
John is Right ! And Joe is Right, too ! What good candidates we have :-) |
K Gardner |
Dec-26-07 06:21 PM |
#26 |
| -
Tell it like it is John. |
JackORoses |
Dec-26-07 06:22 PM |
#27 |
| -
I Completely Agree With Mr. Edwards. n/t |
OhioChick |
Dec-26-07 07:24 PM |
#33 |
| -
He already proved that he is a loser and you delusionals agree with him? |
durrrty libby |
Dec-26-07 07:57 PM |
#37 |
| -
Don't tell me...because the big, bad Republicans will whup us if she runs? Good loser's argument. |
Perry Logan |
Dec-26-07 07:33 PM |
#34 |
| -
More accurately, she is statistically LESS electable. |
AtomicKitten |
Dec-26-07 07:56 PM |
#36 |
| -
As a candidate you can make the argument that you're more electable |
cali |
Dec-27-07 12:46 PM |
#39 |
| -
Interesting |
College Liberal |
Dec-27-07 01:29 PM |
#40 |
| -
A foolish and dangerous comment to make |
Tom Rinaldo |
Dec-27-07 02:14 PM |
#41 |
| -
Not a chance in hell can Hillary be elected, but the robots are told differently by the republicans |
GreenTea |
Dec-27-07 03:34 PM |
#44 |
| -
you might try stowing your crystal ball |
cali |
Dec-27-07 03:38 PM |
#45 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread