MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-23-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 37. So, he's only "principled" to a point? |
|
Coward, at best. gobama..go home.
|
| -Only Obama fails to vote in favor of allowing victims of sexual abuse to seal their court records |
Karmadillo |
Dec-23-07 09:30 AM |
#0 |
 -
The Republicans would swiftboat Jesus Christ to win. |
Olney Blue |
Dec-23-07 09:33 AM |
#1 |
  -
So the republicans made up Obama's mind....alert!! alert!! |
Bitwit1234 |
Dec-23-07 10:30 AM |
#26 |
| -
Huh? |
Olney Blue |
Dec-23-07 10:39 AM |
#36 |
| -
Another lame chapter in Taylor Marsh's incessant shilling for Hillary. |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-23-07 09:34 AM |
#2 |
| -
why do you constantly attack without addressing the issue? |
Evergreen Emerald |
Dec-23-07 09:35 AM |
#4 |
| -
The "Obama votes present" canard has been thoroughly debunked and Taylor knows that. |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-23-07 09:39 AM |
#5 |
| -
it has not been debunked at all. It is an issue for people to consider |
Evergreen Emerald |
Dec-23-07 09:41 AM |
#8 |
| -
People can consider whatever they want. |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-23-07 09:50 AM |
#14 |
| -
Your self serving "fact check" link is nothing but obamanation BS. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 10:34 AM |
#29 |
| -
"thoroughly debunked"? HA! Dream on, Jeff. |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-23-07 09:41 AM |
#9 |
| -
No it hasn't. It's a fact. And this is just another stone on the rockpile. |
acmavm |
Dec-23-07 09:48 AM |
#13 |
| -
'cus that's all they got. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:16 PM |
#60 |
| -
You can't dispute the Truth, so you attack the Truth Bringer? |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-23-07 09:39 AM |
#6 |
| -
Tayor Marsh is a "Truth Bringer"??? |
Lurking Dem |
Dec-23-07 01:02 PM |
#67 |
| -
this video was discussed earlier |
ccpup |
Dec-23-07 09:35 AM |
#3 |
| -
ObamaNation want Obama's record banned from discussion. |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-23-07 09:44 AM |
#11 |
| -
sounds about right |
ccpup |
Dec-23-07 10:01 AM |
#19 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-23-07 11:13 AM |
#49 |
| -
Quit spamming DU, you've used this "reply" on several threads |
Nailzberg |
Dec-23-07 12:06 PM |
#57 |
| -
this is what I don't understand |
Magic Rat |
Dec-23-07 09:41 AM |
#7 |
| -
then there is no hope for America |
Evergreen Emerald |
Dec-23-07 09:42 AM |
#10 |
| -
"Please vote for the myth"? |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-23-07 09:45 AM |
#12 |
| -
Sadly, I think you're right. |
ThatPoetGuy |
Dec-23-07 10:17 AM |
#21 |
| -
uh...what? |
Magic Rat |
Dec-23-07 11:01 AM |
#43 |
| -
Really. |
ThatPoetGuy |
Dec-24-07 07:08 AM |
#73 |
| -
Many Democrats have a hard time understanding your point |
BeyondGeography |
Dec-23-07 10:37 AM |
#32 |
| -
yup |
Magic Rat |
Dec-23-07 11:04 AM |
#44 |
| -
I'll just throw out his reasoning in case anyone actually cares what his reasoning was: |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-23-07 09:52 AM |
#15 |
| -
The nerve of him to actually consider the Constitution! |
babylonsister |
Dec-23-07 09:56 AM |
#16 |
| -
Then why not vote NO, NO balls. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 10:21 AM |
#22 |
| -
Baloney. If you agree with the goal but not the execution then you can vote |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-23-07 10:32 AM |
#28 |
| -
That is a crock...if it's in his opinion |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 10:38 AM |
#33 |
| -
Facts will not persuade hillary's |
zidzi |
Dec-24-07 05:34 PM |
#75 |
| -
Another weekend hit piece by Taylor "HillaryIs44" Marsh, Mark Penn's loyal stenographer blogger |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-23-07 09:58 AM |
#17 |
| -
Taylor Marsh is to Hillary as Hannity is to Chimpy. |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-23-07 10:01 AM |
#18 |
| -
Play the fuckin' victim. thats all you BHO heads have. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 10:28 AM |
#25 |
| -
This, from the worshipper of the candidate who played the "poor widdle me" gender card for weeks? |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-23-07 10:37 AM |
#31 |
| -
When did Dennis Kucinich say anything like that? |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 10:39 AM |
#35 |
| -
Oh, right... you're an alleged Kucinich supporter who happens to defend Hillary most of the time |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-23-07 10:53 AM |
#39 |
| -
This is the same poster who conveniently argues that Obama can't be elected because... |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-23-07 11:04 AM |
#45 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-23-07 11:08 AM |
#47 |
| -
A racist? Wow your an ignorant putz. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:04 PM |
#55 |
| -
And you resort to calling DUers |
zidzi |
Dec-24-07 05:37 PM |
#77 |
| -
And even more IDIOTS FOR OBAMA. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:20 PM |
#63 |
| -
Right, i said that. You are a liar. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:04 PM |
#53 |
| -
Truth hurts, friend. Here's a link - - |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-23-07 01:05 PM |
#68 |
| -
That comment was made in the context of |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 03:06 PM |
#71 |
| -
dupe |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-23-07 10:53 AM |
#40 |
| -
hillary's haters are the fucking |
zidzi |
Dec-24-07 05:35 PM |
#76 |
| -
Just another ugly thread. This can't be doing Clinton any good. |
alteredstate |
Dec-23-07 10:08 AM |
#20 |
| -
Obama owes an explanation |
Onlooker |
Dec-23-07 10:24 AM |
#23 |
| -
It's because the bill was unconstitutional, as posted by Pirate Smile above: |
NYCGirl |
Dec-23-07 10:26 AM |
#24 |
| -
Why would that not warrant a NO vote? |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 10:30 AM |
#27 |
| -
Because that would mean "no" on what the bill is about, not the writing of the bill |
NYCGirl |
Dec-23-07 10:36 AM |
#30 |
| -
So, he's only "principled" to a point? |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 10:40 AM |
#37 |
| -
What part of "unconstitutional" don't you understand? NT |
NYCGirl |
Dec-23-07 10:42 AM |
#38 |
| -
Then why not vote NO, or is it unconstitutional to vote No? |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:05 PM |
#56 |
| -
It was thoroughly explained in a post below: |
NYCGirl |
Dec-23-07 12:17 PM |
#61 |
| -
Sorry, just an EXCUSE not an EXPLANATION. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:19 PM |
#62 |
| -
Obviously, you just understand what you want. NT |
NYCGirl |
Dec-23-07 12:26 PM |
#66 |
| -
It seems you want the conclusion to match up with your facts |
gmudem |
Dec-23-07 11:01 AM |
#42 |
| -
Then why not vote no? BECAUSE HE WANTS TO HIDE ? |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:07 PM |
#58 |
| -
I'm not an Obama supporter. |
gmudem |
Dec-24-07 05:24 PM |
#74 |
| -
Because that is how "present" votes are used in the IL legislature |
frazzled |
Dec-23-07 12:04 PM |
#54 |
| -
That's a right wing argument |
Onlooker |
Dec-23-07 10:38 AM |
#34 |
| -
Obama sides with the constitution on everything, unlike candidates who voted for The Patriot Act |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-23-07 10:58 AM |
#41 |
| -
I don't think he's a conservative ... |
Onlooker |
Dec-23-07 11:13 AM |
#48 |
| -
Well, in that case... |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-23-07 11:22 AM |
#50 |
| -
I figure it's going to come out ... |
Onlooker |
Dec-23-07 11:29 AM |
#51 |
| -
It wasn't a mistake. Three senators voted present in the judiciary committee |
Nailzberg |
Dec-23-07 12:25 PM |
#65 |
| -
Perhaps because such a bill would be unconstitutional? |
MonkeyFunk |
Dec-23-07 11:07 AM |
#46 |
| -
Obama should not get a "pass" for being irresponsible... |
CyberPieHole |
Dec-23-07 11:58 AM |
#52 |
| -
He gets a pass on everything. You are a RACIST if you call him on anything. |
MNDemNY |
Dec-23-07 12:15 PM |
#59 |
| -
Quit ATTACKING Obama!***SARCASM*** |
CyberPieHole |
Dec-23-07 12:22 PM |
#64 |
| -
K&R |
Tellurian |
Dec-23-07 02:23 PM |
#70 |
| -
Because he felt the bill, the way it was is unconstitutional |
tammywammy |
Dec-23-07 01:09 PM |
#69 |
| -
Lessee, Obama voted present according to Illinois law, tradition, or custom... |
hayu_lol |
Dec-23-07 03:25 PM |
#72 |
| -
hillary has a whole |
zidzi |
Dec-24-07 05:41 PM |
#78 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread