You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: it has not been debunked at all. It is an issue for people to consider [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. it has not been debunked at all. It is an issue for people to consider
I have been watching the news and reading the newspapers--I have not seen it debunked at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Only Obama fails to vote in favor of allowing victims of sexual abuse to seal their court records Karmadillo  Dec-23-07 09:30 AM   #0 
  - The Republicans would swiftboat Jesus Christ to win.  Olney Blue   Dec-23-07 09:33 AM   #1 
  - So the republicans made up Obama's mind....alert!! alert!!  Bitwit1234   Dec-23-07 10:30 AM   #26 
     - Huh?  Olney Blue   Dec-23-07 10:39 AM   #36 
  - Another lame chapter in Taylor Marsh's incessant shilling for Hillary.  jefferson_dem   Dec-23-07 09:34 AM   #2 
  - why do you constantly attack without addressing the issue?  Evergreen Emerald   Dec-23-07 09:35 AM   #4 
  - The "Obama votes present" canard has been thoroughly debunked and Taylor knows that.  jefferson_dem   Dec-23-07 09:39 AM   #5 
  - it has not been debunked at all. It is an issue for people to consider  Evergreen Emerald   Dec-23-07 09:41 AM   #8 
  - People can consider whatever they want.  jefferson_dem   Dec-23-07 09:50 AM   #14 
     - Your self serving "fact check" link is nothing but obamanation BS.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 10:34 AM   #29 
  - "thoroughly debunked"? HA! Dream on, Jeff.  MethuenProgressive   Dec-23-07 09:41 AM   #9 
  - No it hasn't. It's a fact. And this is just another stone on the rockpile.  acmavm   Dec-23-07 09:48 AM   #13 
  - 'cus that's all they got.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:16 PM   #60 
  - You can't dispute the Truth, so you attack the Truth Bringer?  MethuenProgressive   Dec-23-07 09:39 AM   #6 
     - Tayor Marsh is a "Truth Bringer"???  Lurking Dem   Dec-23-07 01:02 PM   #67 
  - this video was discussed earlier  ccpup   Dec-23-07 09:35 AM   #3 
  - ObamaNation want Obama's record banned from discussion.  MethuenProgressive   Dec-23-07 09:44 AM   #11 
     - sounds about right  ccpup   Dec-23-07 10:01 AM   #19 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-23-07 11:13 AM   #49 
        - Quit spamming DU, you've used this "reply" on several threads  Nailzberg   Dec-23-07 12:06 PM   #57 
  - this is what I don't understand  Magic Rat   Dec-23-07 09:41 AM   #7 
  - then there is no hope for America  Evergreen Emerald   Dec-23-07 09:42 AM   #10 
  - "Please vote for the myth"?  MethuenProgressive   Dec-23-07 09:45 AM   #12 
  - Sadly, I think you're right.  ThatPoetGuy   Dec-23-07 10:17 AM   #21 
  - uh...what?  Magic Rat   Dec-23-07 11:01 AM   #43 
     - Really.  ThatPoetGuy   Dec-24-07 07:08 AM   #73 
  - Many Democrats have a hard time understanding your point  BeyondGeography   Dec-23-07 10:37 AM   #32 
     - yup  Magic Rat   Dec-23-07 11:04 AM   #44 
  - I'll just throw out his reasoning in case anyone actually cares what his reasoning was:  Pirate Smile   Dec-23-07 09:52 AM   #15 
  - The nerve of him to actually consider the Constitution!  babylonsister   Dec-23-07 09:56 AM   #16 
  - Then why not vote NO, NO balls.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 10:21 AM   #22 
  - Baloney. If you agree with the goal but not the execution then you can vote  Pirate Smile   Dec-23-07 10:32 AM   #28 
     - That is a crock...if it's in his opinion  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 10:38 AM   #33 
  - Facts will not persuade hillary's  zidzi   Dec-24-07 05:34 PM   #75 
  - Another weekend hit piece by Taylor "HillaryIs44" Marsh, Mark Penn's loyal stenographer blogger  ClarkUSA   Dec-23-07 09:58 AM   #17 
  - Taylor Marsh is to Hillary as Hannity is to Chimpy.  jefferson_dem   Dec-23-07 10:01 AM   #18 
  - Play the fuckin' victim. thats all you BHO heads have.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 10:28 AM   #25 
     - This, from the worshipper of the candidate who played the "poor widdle me" gender card for weeks?  ClarkUSA   Dec-23-07 10:37 AM   #31 
     - When did Dennis Kucinich say anything like that?  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 10:39 AM   #35 
        - Oh, right... you're an alleged Kucinich supporter who happens to defend Hillary most of the time  ClarkUSA   Dec-23-07 10:53 AM   #39 
        - This is the same poster who conveniently argues that Obama can't be elected because...  jefferson_dem   Dec-23-07 11:04 AM   #45 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-23-07 11:08 AM   #47 
           - A racist? Wow your an ignorant putz.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:04 PM   #55 
           - And you resort to calling DUers  zidzi   Dec-24-07 05:37 PM   #77 
           - And even more IDIOTS FOR OBAMA.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:20 PM   #63 
           - Right, i said that. You are a liar.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:04 PM   #53 
              - Truth hurts, friend. Here's a link - -  jefferson_dem   Dec-23-07 01:05 PM   #68 
                 - That comment was made in the context of  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 03:06 PM   #71 
        - dupe  ClarkUSA   Dec-23-07 10:53 AM   #40 
     - hillary's haters are the fucking  zidzi   Dec-24-07 05:35 PM   #76 
  - Just another ugly thread. This can't be doing Clinton any good.  alteredstate   Dec-23-07 10:08 AM   #20 
  - Obama owes an explanation  Onlooker   Dec-23-07 10:24 AM   #23 
  - It's because the bill was unconstitutional, as posted by Pirate Smile above:  NYCGirl   Dec-23-07 10:26 AM   #24 
     - Why would that not warrant a NO vote?  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 10:30 AM   #27 
     - Because that would mean "no" on what the bill is about, not the writing of the bill  NYCGirl   Dec-23-07 10:36 AM   #30 
        - So, he's only "principled" to a point?  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 10:40 AM   #37 
           - What part of "unconstitutional" don't you understand? NT  NYCGirl   Dec-23-07 10:42 AM   #38 
           - Then why not vote NO, or is it unconstitutional to vote No?  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:05 PM   #56 
              - It was thoroughly explained in a post below:  NYCGirl   Dec-23-07 12:17 PM   #61 
                 - Sorry, just an EXCUSE not an EXPLANATION.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:19 PM   #62 
                    - Obviously, you just understand what you want. NT  NYCGirl   Dec-23-07 12:26 PM   #66 
           - It seems you want the conclusion to match up with your facts  gmudem   Dec-23-07 11:01 AM   #42 
           - Then why not vote no? BECAUSE HE WANTS TO HIDE ?  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:07 PM   #58 
              - I'm not an Obama supporter.  gmudem   Dec-24-07 05:24 PM   #74 
           - Because that is how "present" votes are used in the IL legislature  frazzled   Dec-23-07 12:04 PM   #54 
     - That's a right wing argument  Onlooker   Dec-23-07 10:38 AM   #34 
        - Obama sides with the constitution on everything, unlike candidates who voted for The Patriot Act  ClarkUSA   Dec-23-07 10:58 AM   #41 
           - I don't think he's a conservative ...  Onlooker   Dec-23-07 11:13 AM   #48 
              - Well, in that case...  ClarkUSA   Dec-23-07 11:22 AM   #50 
                 - I figure it's going to come out ...  Onlooker   Dec-23-07 11:29 AM   #51 
                    - It wasn't a mistake. Three senators voted present in the judiciary committee  Nailzberg   Dec-23-07 12:25 PM   #65 
  - Perhaps because such a bill would be unconstitutional?  MonkeyFunk   Dec-23-07 11:07 AM   #46 
  - Obama should not get a "pass" for being irresponsible...  CyberPieHole   Dec-23-07 11:58 AM   #52 
  - He gets a pass on everything. You are a RACIST if you call him on anything.  MNDemNY   Dec-23-07 12:15 PM   #59 
     - Quit ATTACKING Obama!***SARCASM***  CyberPieHole   Dec-23-07 12:22 PM   #64 
        - K&R  Tellurian   Dec-23-07 02:23 PM   #70 
  - Because he felt the bill, the way it was is unconstitutional  tammywammy   Dec-23-07 01:09 PM   #69 
     - Lessee, Obama voted present according to Illinois law, tradition, or custom...  hayu_lol   Dec-23-07 03:25 PM   #72 
        - hillary has a whole  zidzi   Dec-24-07 05:41 PM   #78 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC