You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #30: Does that make his "Present" vote on this bill more or less TRUE? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Does that make his "Present" vote on this bill more or less TRUE?
I mean, your response is basically putting your fingers in your ears and yelling Na na na!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Obama will be destroyed on his "present" vote on sex shops near schools by the repubs Herman Munster  Dec-20-07 10:59 PM   #0 
  - Right....  ocelot   Dec-20-07 11:00 PM   #1 
  - Really...  Zueda   Dec-20-07 11:20 PM   #25 
  - What are you referring to, specifically? nt  calteacherguy   Dec-20-07 11:01 PM   #2 
  - check it out  Herman Munster   Dec-20-07 11:03 PM   #4 
     - Based on this piece, I'd have to say that Taylor Marsh is a fuckin' moron  Kurt_and_Hunter   Dec-20-07 11:09 PM   #13 
     - Political courage? I find it politically ignorant.  mzmolly   Dec-20-07 11:16 PM   #21 
     - I guess you hate freedom then  Wolsh   Dec-20-07 11:57 PM   #41 
     - Yes, that's it! /sarcasm - I support the FREEDOM of CHILDREN to walk to school  mzmolly   Dec-21-07 12:25 AM   #44 
     - Yes, because without the Senate getting involved, it is completely impossible to zone a city.  KaptBunnyPants   Dec-21-07 02:50 AM   #49 
        - Yes, I'm certain that most owners of strip clubs and bars want to be placed  mzmolly   Dec-21-07 01:37 PM   #59 
     - There's Mr.Wolsh sounding more and more like * every day  Lirwin2   Dec-21-07 02:06 AM   #47 
        - Here's Lirwin, not getting sarcasum again  Wolsh   Dec-21-07 06:09 PM   #68 
           - You spell like a freeper  Lirwin2   Dec-21-07 08:14 PM   #69 
     - the state senate should have ZERO to do with that  Scriptor Ignotus   Dec-21-07 10:01 AM   #52 
        - This thread is not about whether or not the Senate should have been involved.  mzmolly   Dec-21-07 01:40 PM   #61 
           - The Senate was involved because my repuke state senator wrote this POS bill  Nailzberg   Dec-21-07 01:45 PM   #63 
     - Wouldn't it be more couragous to vote against the bill?  Freddie Stubbs   Dec-22-07 12:01 AM   #70 
        - Not if it altered the percentage  Lurking Dem   Dec-22-07 10:15 AM   #72 
     - Well, from what I read I really don't see a problem here.  calteacherguy   Dec-20-07 11:09 PM   #14 
        - Agree, this is a local issue.  Nailzberg   Dec-21-07 01:18 AM   #46 
  - If that vote is a refusal to vote on an unconstitutional measure, I'll back him on it  Kurt_and_Hunter   Dec-20-07 11:02 PM   #3 
  - That isn't an excuse or *we* would be hypocrites to say...  incapsulated   Dec-20-07 11:08 PM   #11 
  - I have a different standard for sex stuff  Kurt_and_Hunter   Dec-20-07 11:23 PM   #29 
  - Obama himself said "You must vote yes or no on whatever bill comes up,"  MethuenProgressive   Dec-20-07 11:11 PM   #15 
  - It is. The guy was only teaching friggin Constitutional Law while he  Pirate Smile   Dec-20-07 11:11 PM   #16 
  - If he thought it was unconstitutional, shouldn't he have voted against it?  11cents   Dec-20-07 11:16 PM   #20 
  - It looks like they did it this way:  Pirate Smile   Dec-20-07 11:21 PM   #26 
  - it doesn't matter  darboy   Dec-21-07 11:40 AM   #57 
  - Then he becomes pro-porn in the kid zone  BeyondGeography   Dec-20-07 11:21 PM   #27 
  - And be on record voting AGAINST restrictions on the sex industry  NCevilDUer   Dec-21-07 12:16 AM   #43 
  - he did  darboy   Dec-21-07 11:36 AM   #56 
  - What would that be, exactly?  aquart   Dec-20-07 11:22 PM   #28 
  - Please provide link or give an explanation as I have no idea what you are referring to  whistle   Dec-20-07 11:03 PM   #5 
  - SB0609 from the 92nd assembly.  Nailzberg   Dec-21-07 12:28 AM   #45 
  - damn Herman you are relentless.  chimpsrsmarter   Dec-20-07 11:04 PM   #6 
  - Oh, he's just performing a service, remember?  BlueDogDemocratNH   Dec-21-07 09:14 AM   #51 
  - K for later  durrrty libby   Dec-20-07 11:05 PM   #7 
  - link to Real Clear Politics on "The Ever-'Present' Obama"  MethuenProgressive   Dec-20-07 11:05 PM   # 
  - someone sure is scared  mth44sc   Dec-20-07 11:08 PM   #10 
  - I'll take third!  MethuenProgressive   Dec-20-07 11:09 PM   #12 
  - I admire your spirit! nt  mth44sc   Dec-20-07 11:12 PM   #17 
  - And the end of your campaign.  Bleachers7   Dec-20-07 11:40 PM   #38 
     - A third place *ends* Richardson's campaign? Don't know much about politics, do you?  MethuenProgressive   Dec-21-07 10:34 AM   #53 
        - Yes, ends as in over, bye bye, gone.  Bleachers7   Dec-21-07 02:45 PM   #67 
  - Does that make his "Present" vote on this bill more or less TRUE?  aquart   Dec-20-07 11:24 PM   #30 
  - Strip joints and porn shops next door to kindergartens? Obama didn't oppose that?  MethuenProgressive   Dec-21-07 10:46 AM   #54 
     - Pathetic.  Lurking Dem   Dec-21-07 11:31 AM   #55 
        - I agree. He should have vote Yes or No and not pathetically dodged the issue.  MethuenProgressive   Dec-21-07 11:55 AM   #58 
  - Yeah, if your name is Dwayne and yer fuckin' yer dawg in mammy's trailer...  zulchzulu   Dec-20-07 11:05 PM   #8 
  - You just made a case for why a "present" vote is neccessary  maximusveritas   Dec-20-07 11:08 PM   #9 
  - It looks like political maneuvering and cowardice  incapsulated   Dec-20-07 11:13 PM   #18 
  - Hardly "running safe". Doing that would be going along with everyone else to vote  Pirate Smile   Dec-20-07 11:27 PM   #33 
  - Given that zoning laws should be left to local authorities, voting "present" was correct.  calteacherguy   Dec-20-07 11:13 PM   #19 
  - please don`t confuse them..  madrchsod   Dec-20-07 11:49 PM   #40 
  - But you don't actually know that. It's an act of faith.  aquart   Dec-20-07 11:25 PM   #32 
  - I've voted present many times  jaysunb   Dec-20-07 11:28 PM   #35 
  - If you think that explanation is going to fly  leftynyc   Dec-21-07 08:47 AM   #50 
  - That reasonable person could find Obama's reasoning in the floor speech that day  Nailzberg   Dec-21-07 02:00 PM   #65 
  - Because we should always let the Republicans define the issues ...  frazzled   Dec-20-07 11:16 PM   #22 
  - Except that so many Americans were for the war, and aren't now.  aquart   Dec-20-07 11:28 PM   #34 
  - All this is old news you know?...nt  Zueda   Dec-20-07 11:18 PM   #23 
  - REALLY ?  jaysunb   Dec-20-07 11:20 PM   #24 
  - What are we going to do tomorrow, brain?  rucky   Dec-20-07 11:25 PM   #31 
  - nope  Fried Bread   Dec-20-07 11:30 PM   #36 
  - Obama will not have to worry bout repubs, not get that far....  BenDavid   Dec-20-07 11:33 PM   #37 
  - taylor-i hate obama-marsh does`t know shit about state politics  madrchsod   Dec-20-07 11:43 PM   #39 
  - Taylor Marsh is a complete joke  Wolsh   Dec-20-07 11:59 PM   #42 
  - Is the Senate reallly the place to decide zoning issues?  KaptBunnyPants   Dec-21-07 02:46 AM   #48 
  - Obamanites don't believe his record will be brought up...if the repugs bring it up...  CyberPieHole   Dec-21-07 01:40 PM   #60 
  - Well, you've indeed presented a most in-depth analysis of the situation...  LanternWaste   Dec-21-07 01:40 PM   #62 
  - Black-and-white thinking is so...Bush-lite.  Alexander   Dec-21-07 01:51 PM   #64 
  - When do you guys break out the Willie Horton ads?  Forkboy   Dec-21-07 02:25 PM   #66 
  - Yep, that's so much more important than authorizing a war  ripple   Dec-22-07 12:04 AM   #71 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC