You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: That might be it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That might be it
but someone said above that he uses robo-ocalling

the other guys us real people they actually call alot more... but they use 600 to get a scientifically accura sample.


I am not sure how y9u get that with robcalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Rasmussen Polling is suddenly deeply suspicious to me Perky  Dec-19-07 08:07 PM   #0 
  - He uses Robo-calls, which may well have different biases than live calling  Kurt_and_Hunter   Dec-19-07 08:09 PM   #1 
  - The data seems to confirm a bias I wonder why its Clinton though.  Perky   Dec-19-07 09:12 PM   #17 
  - One finds them suspicious  OKNancy   Dec-19-07 08:10 PM   #2 
  - Or the data conflicts and conflicts consistently  mmonk   Dec-19-07 08:12 PM   #3 
  - Which is what is being seen here  Perky   Dec-19-07 08:23 PM   #7 
     - Extrapolation is guess work and some are better at it I guess.  mmonk   Dec-19-07 08:35 PM   #11 
        - they are all LV Polls (compare with NH Polling)  Perky   Dec-19-07 08:41 PM   #12 
           - Iowa is going to be harder to predict than New Hampshire IMO.  mmonk   Dec-19-07 08:46 PM   #13 
  - Yes indeed that is the most likely case  durrrty libby   Dec-19-07 08:13 PM   #5 
  - Actually the extreme consistency of the other samples is more suspicious than Ras.  rinsd   Dec-19-07 08:13 PM   #4 
  - What are you saying?  suston96   Dec-19-07 08:18 PM   #6 
     - no on the contrary...the larger the sample the greater the accuracy  Perky   Dec-19-07 08:25 PM   #8 
        - Oh, OK. I misunderstood your intent....but....  suston96   Dec-19-07 08:30 PM   #9 
           - But inconsitent over time.....WHy?  Perky   Dec-19-07 08:34 PM   #10 
              - Because that is all he can get as he polls on a daily basis?  suston96   Dec-19-07 08:46 PM   #14 
              - That might be it  Perky   Dec-19-07 08:51 PM   #15 
              - I really think the answer to your question is that  mmonk   Dec-19-07 09:09 PM   #16 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC