jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. You forgot Biden - who scored a 4.6 - more liberal than Hillary/Obama |
| -Forbes magazine scoring of the candidates |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 02:46 PM |
#0 |
 -
rec |
Progress And Change |
Dec-08-07 02:47 PM |
#1 |
| -
So why is the Right more in love with Hillary than for Richardson? |
HypnoToad |
Dec-08-07 02:47 PM |
#2 |
 -
the right hates Clinton. they love you know who... |
Progress And Change |
Dec-08-07 02:48 PM |
#4 |
| -
the right hates Clinton. they love you know who... |
Progress And Change |
Dec-08-07 02:48 PM |
#5 |
 -
Because they could actually get someone in the White House with Hillary. Not so much with Richardson |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 02:50 PM |
#7 |
| -
The reason i dont agree with this |
hnmnf |
Dec-08-07 02:48 PM |
#3 |
| -
what are kucinich's positions on FP issues not involving Iraq and Iran? |
Progress And Change |
Dec-08-07 02:49 PM |
#6 |
| -
Richardson has called for a withdrawal so speedy that we'd have to abandon all our military |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 02:52 PM |
#9 |
| -
That's RW fiction. Source? Link? |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-08-07 03:26 PM |
#16 |
| -
Richardson: "The issue is light equipment. I would leave some of the light equipment behind." |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 03:48 PM |
#19 |
| -
"abandon all our military equipment" = "leave some light equipment"? |
MethuenProgressive |
Dec-08-07 04:39 PM |
#24 |
| -
So Hillary is to the right of Obama and Edwards on everything except the environment. |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-08-07 02:51 PM |
#8 |
| -
She's not that far to the right of them |
creeksneakers2 |
Dec-08-07 04:44 PM |
#26 |
| -
So Edwards is the most liberal or tied for the most liberal on 4 of 5 categories ... Cool! |
Tejanocrat |
Dec-08-07 02:58 PM |
#10 |
| -
Ron Paul is as far to the lunatic right as you can get on social issues |
Warpy |
Dec-08-07 02:59 PM |
#11 |
| -
You forgot Biden - who scored a 4.6 - more liberal than Hillary/Obama |
pirhana |
Dec-08-07 03:05 PM |
#12 |
| -
Wonder how that happened -- I noticed it, too -- thanks, Pirhana! nt |
gateley |
Dec-08-07 03:23 PM |
#14 |
| -
I didn't forget Biden or Dodd or Gravel. I focused on viable candidates with Kucinich and Paul added |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 03:35 PM |
#17 |
| -
I'd take any publication owned by Steve Forbes with a grain of salt. |
seasat |
Dec-08-07 03:09 PM |
#13 |
| -
Didn't they rate Biden? Thanks. nt |
gateley |
Dec-08-07 03:24 PM |
#15 |
| -
Yes, but I only included viable candidates plus Kucinich (the most liberal) and Paul for context. |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 03:42 PM |
#18 |
| -
Gee, thanks. nt |
gateley |
Dec-08-07 03:52 PM |
#20 |
| -
No, thank YOU for posting reply #14 before #15 so I could tell your question was disingenuous. |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 03:57 PM |
#21 |
| -
Busted and guilty. Just pisses me off that even on DU, people dismiss some |
gateley |
Dec-08-07 04:26 PM |
#23 |
| -
I wish Kucinich had a chance of winning, but I recognize that it is not likely to happen. I'm not |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 05:00 PM |
#29 |
| -
I understand your reasoning -- although it's my HOPE that if Biden were to |
gateley |
Dec-08-07 05:54 PM |
#33 |
| -
Is my eyesight bad, or did they rate Clinton & Edwards ... |
cloudythescribbler |
Dec-08-07 04:15 PM |
#22 |
| -
WHY is "the Environment" a left-right issue? |
Capn Sunshine |
Dec-08-07 04:40 PM |
#25 |
| -
Because of BIG BUSINESS! nt |
polichick |
Dec-08-07 04:46 PM |
#27 |
| -
The poll is faulty without Biden. He is viable, is ahead of Richardson in Iowa... |
monmouth |
Dec-08-07 04:56 PM |
#28 |
| -
It's not a "poll." It's an issue-oriented candidate score card. And, BTW, Richardson is ahead of |
Stop Cornyn |
Dec-08-07 05:09 PM |
#30 |
| -
Whatevah...n/t |
monmouth |
Dec-08-07 05:36 PM |
#31 |
| -
Thanks for the chart, but |
bvar22 |
Dec-08-07 05:54 PM |
#32 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
