Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-03-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
| 48. Not being nasty but really sick of hearing about how great Paul is |
|
because he's against the war. He may be but he's using that to gain popularity.
Kucinich was against the war before any of them opened their mouths!
Paul is a friggin' republican and hardly has a snowballs chance in hell.
I'm not being nasty though, just sick of him being referenced and a main topic.
|
| -Noam Chomsky on Ron Paul |
personman |
Dec-02-07 12:29 AM |
#0 |
-
Chomsky always nails it. Nothing more needs be said. great post! n/t |
Union Thug |
Dec-02-07 12:36 AM |
#1 |
-
Somehow, somewhere... |
Captain Angry |
Dec-02-07 12:41 AM |
#2 |
-
Yes, I would support Ron Paul above Hillary |
Singular73 |
Dec-02-07 12:53 AM |
#3 |
 -
I'd vote for HIllary over Paul anyday of the week |
cali |
Dec-02-07 12:57 AM |
#4 |
  -
Really? |
some guy |
Dec-02-07 01:17 AM |
#9 |
 -
here. |
cali |
Dec-02-07 02:13 AM |
#14 |
  -
Thank you |
some guy |
Dec-02-07 08:18 AM |
#26 |
 -
Yes, really. |
leftist_not_liberal |
Dec-02-07 09:29 AM |
#29 |
 -
"A shock to the system"--Jesus H. Christ, haven't we had enough |
wienerdoggie |
Dec-02-07 12:58 AM |
#5 |
  -
Thank you! |
Donnachaidh |
Dec-02-07 01:14 AM |
#8 |
 -
It was from the interview, sorry, I wasn't asking, corrected for clarity |
personman |
Dec-02-07 01:10 AM |
#7 |
 -
and why is it that those "rabidly dem males aren't motivated to vote for her" |
orleans |
Dec-02-07 02:23 AM |
#16 |
 -
ENOUGH ALREADY WITH THE PAIN !! |
Breeze54 |
Dec-02-07 03:49 AM |
#19 |
 -
I prefer other Democrats to Sen. Clinton, but prefer Clinton over all Repukes, |
Old Crusoe |
Dec-02-07 04:16 AM |
#22 |
 -
sigh |
LeftishBrit |
Dec-02-07 07:00 AM |
#25 |
 -
When you get the flu do you slam your hand in a car door to cure it? |
Telly Savalas |
Dec-02-07 08:22 AM |
#27 |
 -
Shock to the system is your criteria? |
maddiejoan |
Dec-02-07 10:22 AM |
#30 |
 -
That's what Nader and his fans said about electing Bush-- |
tblue37 |
Dec-02-07 11:36 AM |
#32 |
 -
As bad as the system is for the working class, it was worse in 1890 |
Hippo_Tron |
Dec-03-07 03:43 AM |
#45 |
-
Noam got it right .. thanks. |
Hieronymus |
Dec-02-07 01:03 AM |
#6 |
-
Noam would prefer the guy starved rather than |
2rth2pwr |
Dec-02-07 01:29 AM |
#10 |
 -
If that's what you got out of this you may want to work on your reading comprehension. |
personman |
Dec-02-07 01:40 AM |
#11 |
 -
Yeah. |
boloboffin |
Dec-02-07 01:56 AM |
#12 |
-
Chomsky is right, so is Paul on the war. |
autorank |
Dec-02-07 02:00 AM |
#13 |
 -
So what? David Duke is against the war too. n/t |
cali |
Dec-02-07 02:15 AM |
#15 |
  -
So Duke would probably damage the prospects |
Truth2Tell |
Dec-02-07 10:58 PM |
#39 |
   -
An exposed flank in the unlikeliest of places even. |
FatDave |
Dec-03-07 12:12 AM |
#40 |
  -
Damn, that's a nasty response. |
autorank |
Dec-03-07 02:42 AM |
#41 |
 -
Paul has the right position on the war, yes, but for the wrong reason. |
AnotherGreenWorld |
Dec-02-07 02:54 AM |
#17 |
  -
I'd have real problems ever supporting Paul or any one who sticks their head in the sand |
autorank |
Dec-03-07 02:46 AM |
#42 |
 -
Paul really opposes the war, of course, because it means higher taxes. |
AnotherGreenWorld |
Dec-03-07 03:51 PM |
#52 |
 -
I have great admiration for the memory of Wayne Morse... |
LeftishBrit |
Dec-04-07 06:19 AM |
#55 |
 -
Paul is a libertarian REPUBLICAN! |
Breeze54 |
Dec-02-07 03:52 AM |
#20 |
  -
OK, more nastiness. |
autorank |
Dec-03-07 02:50 AM |
#43 |
 -
Not being nasty but really sick of hearing about how great Paul is |
Breeze54 |
Dec-03-07 11:09 AM |
#48 |
 -
No problemo. People are raw on old RP - "Chomsky is right, so is Paul on the War" |
autorank |
Dec-03-07 01:48 PM |
#49 |
 -
Don't get me started on Huck-a-BS! |
Breeze54 |
Dec-03-07 03:01 PM |
#51 |
 -
Here's chapter in a book of "Revelations" about old "Huck" - a true horror show n/t |
autorank |
Dec-03-07 09:09 PM |
#54 |
 -
Bingo |
bonito |
Dec-02-07 06:51 AM |
#23 |
  -
Five responses to my thought provoking irony. |
autorank |
Dec-03-07 02:53 AM |
#44 |
 -
McCain is right on torture, Giuliani on public works, Tompson on national debt |
robbedvoter |
Dec-02-07 04:27 PM |
#37 |
-
George Bush is a radical, so is Ron Paul, we do not need any more radicals in the Oval office. |
gordianot |
Dec-02-07 03:02 AM |
#18 |
-
Imagine for a moment Katie Couric interviewing Noam Chomsky, |
Old Crusoe |
Dec-02-07 04:04 AM |
#21 |
 -
Unfortunately it will never happen because the corporate media has banned Chomsky from appearing... |
MN Against Bush |
Dec-02-07 08:26 AM |
#28 |
-
Very much the case, yes. No "roundrobin" news show I've seen |
Old Crusoe |
Dec-02-07 10:48 AM |
#31 |
-
Try watching LinkTV and Freespeech(FSTV) and listen to Democracy Now. |
L0oniX |
Dec-03-07 02:02 PM |
#50 |
-
Great stuff!!! |
LeftishBrit |
Dec-02-07 06:53 AM |
#24 |
-
I'm a Democrat. Only Democrats get my vote... |
LanternWaste |
Dec-02-07 01:22 PM |
#33 |
-
The economy is collapsing, 911 was an inside job and Chomsky is still a gate-keeper |
CGowen |
Dec-02-07 02:22 PM |
#34 |
-
That's what I asked the Ron Paul robots tabling at a recent street fair |
omega minimo |
Dec-02-07 03:46 PM |
#35 |
-
Beautifully summed up. |
robbedvoter |
Dec-02-07 04:24 PM |
#36 |
-
Libertarians don't understand the nature of "Economic Coercion" |
NAO |
Dec-02-07 07:53 PM |
#38 |
-
If libertarians had always ruled, we would all be dead from DDT. |
Perry Logan |
Dec-03-07 06:29 AM |
#46 |
-
Thanks - Good to read. |
Mass |
Dec-03-07 06:35 AM |
#47 |
 -
Paul is a LIBERTARIAN -Republican. |
Disturbed |
Dec-03-07 04:03 PM |
#53 |
-
Some Ron Paul supporters are saying this is a hoax or a fraud... |
personman |
Dec-08-07 11:36 AM |
#56 |