rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-26-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 43. You're probably right. n/t |
| -Why Kucinich may not be responding to Paul "story" |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 01:55 PM |
#0 |
 -
Why did his wife say this? |
stuartrida |
Nov-26-07 01:59 PM |
#1 |
 -
I think elizebeth was just being nice, I mean she's not going to |
fenriswolf |
Nov-26-07 02:02 PM |
#3 |
| -
She was obviously taken by surprise |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:06 PM |
#8 |
 -
No one is asking her to "spit in disgust." I just want her to be honest |
stuartrida |
Nov-26-07 02:07 PM |
#10 |
| -
1. she said it is a consideration |
fenriswolf |
Nov-26-07 02:11 PM |
#16 |
| -
here |
stuartrida |
Nov-26-07 02:20 PM |
#31 |
| -
Your BLOG "article" backs up NONE of your assertiones. |
AlertLurker |
Nov-26-07 03:11 PM |
#49 |
| -
Standard operating procedure for the Pee Dee |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 03:47 PM |
#55 |
| -
When I hear the most brain-dead idea presented to me... |
LanternWaste |
Nov-27-07 01:57 PM |
#125 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-26-07 02:03 PM |
#4 |
| -
I am a troll for believing Elizabeth Kucinich? |
stuartrida |
Nov-26-07 02:10 PM |
#15 |
| -
No, but it's not very bright to take the media at their word |
cuke |
Nov-26-07 04:35 PM |
#73 |
| -
you appear to be fairly new here. Perhaps you are unaware |
cali |
Nov-26-07 02:13 PM |
#21 |
| -
I was unaware of that, actually. |
Kucinich4America |
Nov-26-07 02:16 PM |
#24 |
| -
I think he/she doesn't like Kucinich |
cali |
Nov-26-07 02:18 PM |
#29 |
| -
Scroll down to the bottom of the page. Amidst the fine print, you'll see a link to RULES in blue. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 02:26 PM |
#37 |
| -
Is it too much to be polite? |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:29 PM |
#40 |
| -
How was I impolite in that post? Smooth move, from someone who calls people DRUNK when they |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 02:35 PM |
#44 |
| -
His WIFE said it - DENNIS, the Presidential Candidate did not. Why do you want |
gateley |
Nov-26-07 02:03 PM |
#5 |
| -
Dennis isn't going to verify it |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:07 PM |
#11 |
| -
But if enough fuss arises as a result of this, he needs to address it regardless |
gateley |
Nov-26-07 02:12 PM |
#18 |
| -
Call his campaign, then |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:15 PM |
#23 |
| -
But (but...but...) if it goes beyond the CPD and starts garnering national attention, |
gateley |
Nov-26-07 02:29 PM |
#41 |
| -
Call his campaign |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:31 PM |
#42 |
| -
Never mind. nt |
gateley |
Nov-26-07 02:37 PM |
#45 |
| -
Kucinich introduced impeachment and it didn't make the papers |
cuke |
Nov-26-07 04:37 PM |
#76 |
| -
Unless |
kenfrequed |
Nov-26-07 05:46 PM |
#87 |
| -
His campaign called me tonight and I addressed it...not pleased. |
mirrera |
Nov-26-07 07:43 PM |
#109 |
| -
Terrific. Can't wait to see what she says next. |
aquart |
Nov-26-07 02:26 PM |
#38 |
| -
No, he said it, too. And Paul's campaign said "Fuck no" pretty much. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 02:37 PM |
#46 |
| -
Gateley, Oh but Dennis did verify Elizabeth's statements... |
hayu_lol |
Nov-26-07 05:09 PM |
#81 |
| -
It has been verified |
skipos |
Nov-28-07 03:34 PM |
#142 |
| -
Taken out of context |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:05 PM |
#7 |
| -
What does the reporter have to do with her answer? |
stuartrida |
Nov-26-07 02:08 PM |
#12 |
| -
WTF? |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:17 PM |
#28 |
| -
Huh? |
stuartrida |
Nov-26-07 02:22 PM |
#33 |
| -
You keep saying it |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:25 PM |
#36 |
| -
This doesn't mean a whole lot... |
AlertLurker |
Nov-26-07 08:18 PM |
#114 |
| -
k&r that story made me so unhappy |
fenriswolf |
Nov-26-07 02:00 PM |
#2 |
| -
Why do you have "story" in quotes--the two reporters were "quoting" the candidate |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 02:04 PM |
#6 |
| -
Artful use of quotes |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:09 PM |
#13 |
| -
I'm not particularly focusing on HIS words--look at the Paul aide's words. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 02:16 PM |
#25 |
| -
And the Paul aide was responding to what/whom? |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:28 PM |
#39 |
| -
To a QUESTION, a question that's IN the fucking article, if you would bother to READ it. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 02:47 PM |
#47 |
| -
Where is Dennis' question? |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 03:12 PM |
#50 |
| -
Jesus, you don't read, do you? There was no "question" asked of Kucinich. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 03:25 PM |
#51 |
| -
He didn't say,"as a running mate" |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 03:38 PM |
#54 |
| -
Yeah, sure--that's why the reporters put their reputations on the line, to LIE about a fringe |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 03:48 PM |
#56 |
| -
Their "reputations"? |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 03:52 PM |
#58 |
| -
Call them up, send them an email. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 04:00 PM |
#62 |
| -
Why do I feel like I'm discussing this with a 9/11 conspiracy theorists |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 04:57 PM |
#78 |
| -
If anyone's moving targets, it's those who say "Kucinich never said that!!" |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 05:06 PM |
#80 |
| -
I never said there wasn't one |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 05:35 PM |
#84 |
| -
You sure took the view that the seventy supporters were in DURHAM, in post 82. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 05:40 PM |
#85 |
| -
Admit you were wrong about me saying there was "no house party" |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 05:43 PM |
#86 |
| -
No, because you tried to assist in the moving of the target from Acworth to Durham |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 05:46 PM |
#88 |
| -
Now your a mind reader? |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 05:57 PM |
#90 |
| -
No--I read what you wrote. VERY DOUBTFUL, you said. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:02 PM |
#93 |
| -
They did fuck up |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 06:49 PM |
#105 |
| -
Just because you make shit up, doesn't make it so. But keep digging, there, pal!! |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 07:02 PM |
#107 |
| -
I never called you a conspiracy theorist |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 07:43 PM |
#108 |
| -
Yes, you DID. And I QUOTE you, exactly: |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 08:16 PM |
#111 |
| -
Note the difference between saying |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 08:17 PM |
#112 |
| -
There's no difference. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 08:22 PM |
#115 |
| -
Again, you assume to know what I would do |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 08:37 PM |
#116 |
| -
I know what you posted. Get over yourself. Cut the crap. Grow up. NT |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 09:02 PM |
#117 |
| -
holy shit... |
Whisp |
Nov-27-07 02:22 PM |
#126 |
| -
Yeah, that's it!!!! They're all OUT TO GET HIM!!!!! That's the ticket! nt |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 05:47 PM |
#134 |
| -
I suppose you'll learn the hard way |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 03:55 PM |
#60 |
| -
Well, that's a nice wet turd, and apropos of nothing. You haven't proved your |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 04:02 PM |
#64 |
| -
So who is your candidate? |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 04:05 PM |
#65 |
| -
Save Kucinich and Gravel, for whom I will not vote, I remain undecided. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 04:28 PM |
#70 |
| -
"I will vote Dem in the general" |
kenfrequed |
Nov-26-07 05:58 PM |
#91 |
| -
WTF is that post all about? |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:12 PM |
#95 |
| -
The answer you didn't want |
kenfrequed |
Nov-27-07 08:31 AM |
#122 |
| -
So, what you're saying is first, you made a false assumption about me and |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 01:48 PM |
#124 |
| -
Whatever... |
kenfrequed |
Nov-27-07 05:26 PM |
#131 |
| -
Leave Dennis ALONE!!! PLEASE!!!!!!! Can't you see what a hard LIFE he has??? |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 05:49 PM |
#135 |
| -
Yeah sure |
kenfrequed |
Nov-27-07 05:55 PM |
#136 |
| -
OOOOH--the HATE!!! The 'Self-Deluded HATE!!!!!! ' |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 06:03 PM |
#137 |
| -
And that's going to be funny... |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 05:00 PM |
#79 |
| -
"I am thinking about Ron Paul" |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 03:54 PM |
#59 |
| -
The context is plainly stated. Keep insisting it isn't, but it is. Even though you don't like it. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 04:19 PM |
#68 |
| -
if all 70 in attendance heard Kucinich say this... |
Whisp |
Nov-27-07 02:57 PM |
#127 |
| -
He was probably in a corner, or over by the piano, in a good sized home. |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 03:27 PM |
#128 |
| -
If they're wrong, he should call them on it. nt |
onehandle |
Nov-26-07 02:06 PM |
#9 |
| -
Read the post again |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:12 PM |
#19 |
| -
Whatever. People complain that Kerry didn't respond to the swiftboaters. |
onehandle |
Nov-26-07 03:07 PM |
#48 |
| -
No doubt, a candidate should reply |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 04:06 PM |
#66 |
| -
No point in giving the PD more words to twist |
riqster |
Nov-26-07 02:16 PM |
#26 |
| -
Exactly |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:22 PM |
#32 |
| -
Thanks. But I really hope this doesn't get picked up on the AP wire... |
rucky |
Nov-26-07 02:10 PM |
#14 |
| -
Let's hope it does |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:13 PM |
#22 |
| -
By then it'll be too late. |
rucky |
Nov-26-07 02:17 PM |
#27 |
| -
Nah, its a non-story |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 02:23 PM |
#34 |
| -
You're probably right. n/t |
rucky |
Nov-26-07 02:31 PM |
#43 |
| -
this is just painful watching the tortuous attempt to |
cali |
Nov-26-07 02:11 PM |
#17 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-26-07 02:13 PM |
#20 |
| -
You win the Grand Prize!!! That's it, precisely. Of COURSE he said it. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 02:18 PM |
#30 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-26-07 02:24 PM |
#35 |
| -
The quotes by DK are broken up |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 03:28 PM |
#52 |
| -
They aren't broken up--the stuff between them is explaining the context of what |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 03:37 PM |
#53 |
| -
Now you're just stretching reality. |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 03:49 PM |
#57 |
| -
No, I am not stretching reality--you are. Frantically, too. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 03:56 PM |
#61 |
| -
Here's your "house party" |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 04:01 PM |
#63 |
| -
Interesting, none of the other reporters heard the remark |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 04:17 PM |
#67 |
| -
How many 'other reporters' were on Mason RD in ACWORTH? |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 04:31 PM |
#71 |
| -
Man, you can't even fucking research. Here's the house party. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 04:26 PM |
#69 |
| -
Ok, I'm beginning to feel sorry for you n/t |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 04:34 PM |
#72 |
| -
I'm not the one who doesn't know Durham from Acworth. NT |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 04:35 PM |
#74 |
| -
I did |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 04:42 PM |
#77 |
| -
Oh, so that's it. Great logic there!!!! There can NEVER be "about seventy" DK supporters in more |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 05:12 PM |
#82 |
| -
You know what's even funnier? |
inthebrain |
Nov-26-07 05:27 PM |
#83 |
| -
Well, of COURSE he isn't going to "select" Paul. Paul told him to FUCK OFF. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:16 PM |
#96 |
| -
Uhm did you even look at yoru "quotes" |
kenfrequed |
Nov-26-07 06:03 PM |
#94 |
| -
Uhm, why YES, I DID. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:20 PM |
#97 |
| -
sigh |
kenfrequed |
Nov-27-07 08:10 AM |
#121 |
| -
Oh, double sigh!!! All of the stuff 'in parens' is shit he did say, paraphrased. |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 01:43 PM |
#123 |
| -
You are now lying |
kenfrequed |
Nov-27-07 05:13 PM |
#129 |
| -
No, I am not lying. |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 05:20 PM |
#130 |
| -
Ok fine |
kenfrequed |
Nov-27-07 05:33 PM |
#132 |
| -
"Your Psychic" |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 05:46 PM |
#133 |
| -
Riiight |
kenfrequed |
Nov-27-07 06:06 PM |
#138 |
| -
You might try USING the spell check provided--your spelling really does suck! |
MADem |
Nov-27-07 06:27 PM |
#139 |
| -
Have any of the seventy come out to verify? |
Chulanowa |
Nov-26-07 05:51 PM |
#89 |
| -
The same newspaper's editor & publisher refused to endorse Kerry |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 06:02 PM |
#92 |
| -
So? Your point? |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:25 PM |
#99 |
| -
They're a terrible newspaper with a very long history |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 06:35 PM |
#100 |
| -
So's the HERALD. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:41 PM |
#102 |
| -
Why would they "verify" something they heard the guy say? There are only a few |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:23 PM |
#98 |
| -
They didn't "verify" anything |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 06:36 PM |
#101 |
| -
They provided cites, locations, reporter names, emails and phone numbers. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:43 PM |
#103 |
| -
Only of the reporters, who can't be trusted |
OzarkDem |
Nov-26-07 06:48 PM |
#104 |
| -
Yeah, let's trust YOU, on an anonymous message board--no phone number, no email, no cites, |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 06:51 PM |
#106 |
| -
I like having multiple sources to prop up a shaky claim |
Chulanowa |
Nov-26-07 07:50 PM |
#110 |
| -
I think it's funny when people take offense at something that is inoffensive. |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 08:18 PM |
#113 |
| -
She actually said it was a "consideration" |
Chulanowa |
Nov-26-07 09:09 PM |
#118 |
| -
I realize that. nt |
MADem |
Nov-26-07 09:10 PM |
#119 |
| -
The way the question was asked and answered, one couldn't tell whether... |
polichick |
Nov-26-07 04:36 PM |
#75 |
| -
120. Funny how this Kucinich thread wasn't voted up to the front page in five minutes. |
onehandle |
Nov-27-07 05:54 AM |
#120 |
| -
I believe the story |
Enrique |
Nov-27-07 08:36 PM |
#140 |
| -
So do a few rather angry Jews |
MADem |
Nov-28-07 06:48 AM |
#141 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread