Nothing at Kucinich web site re Ron Paul "story" [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

OzarkDem (1000+ posts)

Mon Nov-26-07 12:01 PM
Original message

Nothing at Kucinich web site re Ron Paul "story"

Advertisements [?]

One would think if a Democratic candidate had made such a stunning announcement as considering a Republican as a running mate, he would have it posted at his web site.

Guess what? He doesn't. Why? Probably because the story is a phony one.

http://www.dennis4president.com/home/

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Nothing at Kucinich web site re Ron Paul "story"	OzarkDem	Nov-26-07 12:01 PM	#0
Phony or an overreaction	riqster	Nov-26-07 12:02 PM	#1
So Elizabeth was was lying?	stuartrida	Nov-26-07 12:02 PM	#2
She was was chatting. Casually. Like you.	Amanita	Nov-26-07 12:05 PM	#3
So then what she said was the truth?	stuartrida	Nov-26-07 12:08 PM	#4
She wasn't specific	OzarkDem	Nov-26-07 12:12 PM	#5
BTW, Welcome to DU	OzarkDem	Nov-26-07 12:14 PM	#7
Just making sure. You think this isn't "specific?"	stuartrida	Nov-26-07 12:29 PM	#10
I think its rather odd and reeks of Rove	OzarkDem	Nov-26-07 12:35 PM	#12
Rove doesn't give 2 shits about Kucinich	stuartrida	Nov-26-07 12:41 PM	#13
Its about impeaching Cheney - not the election	OzarkDem	Nov-26-07 12:46 PM	#14
Thanks for pointing that out	riqster	Nov-26-07 12:51 PM	#19
Then shouldn't a simple" I never said that"	sufrommich	Nov-26-07 12:50 PM	#18
Keep in mind, Kooch doesn't work like the front-runners	riqster	Nov-26-07 12:58 PM	#21
Have you seen the video?	aikoaiko	Nov-27-07 03:17 PM	#32
Lying is a word that is not applicable in this context	riqster	Nov-26-07 12:13 PM	#6
She said "consider".	NCevilDUer	Nov-26-07 12:27 PM	#9
So we agree Dennis is "considering" id	stuartrida	Nov-26-07 12:31 PM	#11
Since you don't care what the word 'consider' means	NCevilDUer	Nov-26-07 12:47 PM	#17
You don't need to swear at me if you don't want to answer my question.	stuartrida	Nov-26-07 01:39 PM	#27
I did answer your fucking question, and you are being deliberately	NCevilDUer	Nov-27-07 12:23 PM	#30
Maybe she was used to float the idea and see what kind of reaction	BridgeTheGap	Nov-26-07 12:24 PM	#8
If this story is phony and Kucinich does not refute it then...	Tom Rinaldo	Nov-26-07 12:46 PM	#15
I don't think	H2O Man	Nov-26-07 12:47 PM	#16
the only significance I can see is that	cali	Nov-26-07 12:57 PM	#20
That is certainly	H2O Man	Nov-26-07 01:07 PM	#22
I don't think he is either.	cali	Nov-26-07 01:20 PM	#24
I can understand	H2O Man	Nov-26-07 01:34 PM	#26
You say	stuartrida	Nov-26-07 01:45 PM	#28
I think that	H2O Man	Nov-26-07 01:49 PM	#29
Wouldn't he want to do some damage control, then?	rucky	Nov-26-07 01:08 PM	#23
I think he should, but he gets this kind of heat all the time	riqster	Nov-26-07 01:21 PM	#25
I don't get what all the fuss is about. His wife said he would consider it and	skipos	Nov-27-07 01:54 PM	#31

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.