You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #49: Yep. I understand they've recently 'adjusted' their weighting, but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Yep. I understand they've recently 'adjusted' their weighting, but
they're weighting using preferences that were valid before BushCo really hit the toilet--so they're still "off."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Clinton Trails Giuliani, Barely Leads Thompson (Nov 23 Rasmussen poll) skipos  Nov-23-07 04:22 PM   #0 
  - Weird. Rudy Garland is declining among Republicans. nt  MookieWilson   Nov-23-07 04:23 PM   #1 
  - The Obama/Edwards/GOP attacks are working.  MethuenProgressive   Nov-24-07 09:50 PM   #36 
  - Ras's explanation is clear  papau   Nov-23-07 04:26 PM   #2 
  - However You Slice the Numbers, IT'S BAD  AndyTiedye   Nov-23-07 04:59 PM   #10 
  - Our front runner?  FogerRox   Nov-23-07 05:08 PM   #14 
  - Neither of the party's front-runners is their strongest candidate.  JDPriestly   Nov-23-07 09:20 PM   #29 
  - Um, I thought Ras was saying Edwards beats all repubs in a general election  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 10:04 PM   #40 
  - Correct., thanks  FogerRox   Nov-23-07 05:05 PM   #12 
  - Too close for comfort. WAY too close.  calteacherguy   Nov-23-07 04:31 PM   #3 
  - Much ado about nothing --  maddiejoan   Nov-23-07 04:33 PM   #4 
  - The Hillary Campaign Gaggle: Much Ado about NOTHING!  earthlover   Nov-23-07 08:43 PM   #24 
     - Why does anyone run for President?  maddiejoan   Nov-23-07 09:34 PM   #31 
  - Oh fachrissake. Don't be foolish. Rasmussen reports are WACKILY biased.  MADem   Nov-23-07 04:53 PM   #5 
  - Ras is biased ..yes.. but has good methodology and is consistant  FogerRox   Nov-23-07 04:59 PM   #9 
  - As a biased tool--one that is consistently incorrect and favors the GOP and their agenda.  MADem   Nov-23-07 05:37 PM   #15 
     - good of you to stay on message  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 02:22 PM   #33 
        - I don't have a "message" or, for that matter, a candidate.  MADem   Nov-24-07 07:12 PM   #34 
           - Look, Ras's state level polls are one thing, his national polls are another  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 09:45 PM   #35 
              - I don't believe ANYTHING they say. They're always "off to the side."  MADem   Nov-25-07 02:41 AM   #45 
  - I agree that their Bush fav/unfavs are skewed, but their election polls are usually accurate  skipos   Nov-23-07 05:52 PM   #18 
  - Well, think about it--that Kerry election was stolen, so if they called that  MADem   Nov-23-07 07:20 PM   #23 
  - you cant compare Ras's state level polls with his national polls  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 10:00 PM   #38 
  - RepiglickinAssMuffin is Biased, But So Are the Voting Machinez  AndyTiedye   Nov-23-07 10:35 PM   #32 
  - Ras 's national polls suck, his state level polls are better  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 10:13 PM   #44 
  - More on Rasmussen's Republican bias.  Perry Logan   Nov-25-07 06:53 AM   #47 
     - Yep. I understand they've recently 'adjusted' their weighting, but  MADem   Nov-25-07 03:59 PM   #49 
  - Gee if Hillary is that low in the polls than Obama must not even register.  Bitwit1234   Nov-23-07 04:53 PM   #6 
  - We can save ourselves the grief, by nominating someone else.  Carrieyazel   Nov-23-07 04:57 PM   #7 
  - where are the other dems in comparison?  Evergreen Emerald   Nov-23-07 04:58 PM   #8 
  - Awful. We Need to DRAFT GORE  AndyTiedye   Nov-23-07 05:01 PM   #11 
  - In past head to head polls, Obama and Edwards do somewhat better than Hillary  Carrieyazel   Nov-23-07 05:59 PM   #19 
  - good question, follow the link Edwards is doing very well in Iowa  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 10:06 PM   #41 
  - Follow the link, the poll did not include other DEMS  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 10:12 PM   #42 
  - Of course she polls lousy.....50% of Americans would not even consider voting for Hillary  earthlover   Nov-23-07 08:46 PM   #25 
  - This country is going to need one giant barf bag if the election is Hillary vs. the Ghoul  BlueStater   Nov-25-07 02:52 AM   #46 
  - With all the crap the repubs have pulled  ben_meyers   Nov-23-07 05:06 PM   #13 
  - The Dead Dog would beat Hillary by a wide margin  earthlover   Nov-23-07 08:47 PM   #26 
  - Senator Clinton is another mistake the Democrats are about to make. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Nov-23-07 05:42 PM   #16 
  - ditto. when will this party ever figure out how to win. nm  TeamJordan23   Nov-23-07 06:57 PM   #21 
  - that leaves 10% undecided and it THEY who will determine the winner!  Didereaux   Nov-23-07 05:50 PM   #17 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-23-07 06:18 PM   #20 
  - Clinton is showing a lot more wear from attacks than I would have expected.  Basileus Basileon   Nov-23-07 06:59 PM   #22 
  - She will be third in Iowa, and fade away.  earthlover   Nov-23-07 08:48 PM   #27 
  - they need to poll how others do against the republicans and not just Hillary  illinoisprogressive   Nov-23-07 09:01 PM   #28 
  - Exactly, you cant compare a poll with only Obama & Clinton vs repubs  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 10:02 PM   #39 
  - Real Clear Politics is better for polling data imo.  ilovesunshine   Nov-23-07 09:22 PM   #30 
  - Except that RCP skips Edwards in some polls, just read the link you provided  FogerRox   Nov-24-07 09:58 PM   #37 
  - Poll #374 which shows us Hillary can't win.  Alexander   Nov-24-07 10:12 PM   #43 
     - Hillary can't lose. Here's her excellent record...  Perry Logan   Nov-25-07 06:55 AM   #48 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC