MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-23-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 15. As a biased tool--one that is consistently incorrect and favors the GOP and their agenda. |
|
That's like saying "Say, Mrs. Brown makes cookies, and they taste like shit, but they taste, quite reliably, like the EXACT same shit every time!!! She sure is accurate and consistent with that lousy recipe! Let's give her some credit!!!"
If your goal is to suggest, perhaps unreliably and falsely, that Clinton is a weak candidate against Giuliani, well, Ras is a wonderful "tool." But only a 'tool' would take what they say without a massive chunk o'salt.
They have an agenda, and it shows.
|
| -Clinton Trails Giuliani, Barely Leads Thompson (Nov 23 Rasmussen poll) |
skipos |
Nov-23-07 04:22 PM |
#0 |
 -
Weird. Rudy Garland is declining among Republicans. nt |
MookieWilson |
Nov-23-07 04:23 PM |
#1 |
  -
The Obama/Edwards/GOP attacks are working. |
MethuenProgressive |
Nov-24-07 09:50 PM |
#36 |
| -
Ras's explanation is clear |
papau |
Nov-23-07 04:26 PM |
#2 |
| -
However You Slice the Numbers, IT'S BAD |
AndyTiedye |
Nov-23-07 04:59 PM |
#10 |
| -
Our front runner? |
FogerRox |
Nov-23-07 05:08 PM |
#14 |
| -
Neither of the party's front-runners is their strongest candidate. |
JDPriestly |
Nov-23-07 09:20 PM |
#29 |
| -
Um, I thought Ras was saying Edwards beats all repubs in a general election |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 10:04 PM |
#40 |
| -
Correct., thanks |
FogerRox |
Nov-23-07 05:05 PM |
#12 |
| -
Too close for comfort. WAY too close. |
calteacherguy |
Nov-23-07 04:31 PM |
#3 |
| -
Much ado about nothing -- |
maddiejoan |
Nov-23-07 04:33 PM |
#4 |
| -
The Hillary Campaign Gaggle: Much Ado about NOTHING! |
earthlover |
Nov-23-07 08:43 PM |
#24 |
| -
Why does anyone run for President? |
maddiejoan |
Nov-23-07 09:34 PM |
#31 |
| -
Oh fachrissake. Don't be foolish. Rasmussen reports are WACKILY biased. |
MADem |
Nov-23-07 04:53 PM |
#5 |
| -
Ras is biased ..yes.. but has good methodology and is consistant |
FogerRox |
Nov-23-07 04:59 PM |
#9 |
| -
As a biased tool--one that is consistently incorrect and favors the GOP and their agenda. |
MADem |
Nov-23-07 05:37 PM |
#15 |
| -
good of you to stay on message |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 02:22 PM |
#33 |
| -
I don't have a "message" or, for that matter, a candidate. |
MADem |
Nov-24-07 07:12 PM |
#34 |
| -
Look, Ras's state level polls are one thing, his national polls are another |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 09:45 PM |
#35 |
| -
I don't believe ANYTHING they say. They're always "off to the side." |
MADem |
Nov-25-07 02:41 AM |
#45 |
| -
I agree that their Bush fav/unfavs are skewed, but their election polls are usually accurate |
skipos |
Nov-23-07 05:52 PM |
#18 |
| -
Well, think about it--that Kerry election was stolen, so if they called that |
MADem |
Nov-23-07 07:20 PM |
#23 |
| -
you cant compare Ras's state level polls with his national polls |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 10:00 PM |
#38 |
| -
RepiglickinAssMuffin is Biased, But So Are the Voting Machinez |
AndyTiedye |
Nov-23-07 10:35 PM |
#32 |
| -
Ras 's national polls suck, his state level polls are better |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 10:13 PM |
#44 |
| -
More on Rasmussen's Republican bias. |
Perry Logan |
Nov-25-07 06:53 AM |
#47 |
| -
Yep. I understand they've recently 'adjusted' their weighting, but |
MADem |
Nov-25-07 03:59 PM |
#49 |
| -
Gee if Hillary is that low in the polls than Obama must not even register. |
Bitwit1234 |
Nov-23-07 04:53 PM |
#6 |
| -
We can save ourselves the grief, by nominating someone else. |
Carrieyazel |
Nov-23-07 04:57 PM |
#7 |
| -
where are the other dems in comparison? |
Evergreen Emerald |
Nov-23-07 04:58 PM |
#8 |
| -
Awful. We Need to DRAFT GORE |
AndyTiedye |
Nov-23-07 05:01 PM |
#11 |
| -
In past head to head polls, Obama and Edwards do somewhat better than Hillary |
Carrieyazel |
Nov-23-07 05:59 PM |
#19 |
| -
good question, follow the link Edwards is doing very well in Iowa |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 10:06 PM |
#41 |
| -
Follow the link, the poll did not include other DEMS |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 10:12 PM |
#42 |
| -
Of course she polls lousy.....50% of Americans would not even consider voting for Hillary |
earthlover |
Nov-23-07 08:46 PM |
#25 |
| -
This country is going to need one giant barf bag if the election is Hillary vs. the Ghoul |
BlueStater |
Nov-25-07 02:52 AM |
#46 |
| -
With all the crap the repubs have pulled |
ben_meyers |
Nov-23-07 05:06 PM |
#13 |
| -
The Dead Dog would beat Hillary by a wide margin |
earthlover |
Nov-23-07 08:47 PM |
#26 |
| -
Senator Clinton is another mistake the Democrats are about to make. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Nov-23-07 05:42 PM |
#16 |
| -
ditto. when will this party ever figure out how to win. nm |
TeamJordan23 |
Nov-23-07 06:57 PM |
#21 |
| -
that leaves 10% undecided and it THEY who will determine the winner! |
Didereaux |
Nov-23-07 05:50 PM |
#17 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-23-07 06:18 PM |
#20 |
| -
Clinton is showing a lot more wear from attacks than I would have expected. |
Basileus Basileon |
Nov-23-07 06:59 PM |
#22 |
| -
She will be third in Iowa, and fade away. |
earthlover |
Nov-23-07 08:48 PM |
#27 |
| -
they need to poll how others do against the republicans and not just Hillary |
illinoisprogressive |
Nov-23-07 09:01 PM |
#28 |
| -
Exactly, you cant compare a poll with only Obama & Clinton vs repubs |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 10:02 PM |
#39 |
| -
Real Clear Politics is better for polling data imo. |
ilovesunshine |
Nov-23-07 09:22 PM |
#30 |
| -
Except that RCP skips Edwards in some polls, just read the link you provided |
FogerRox |
Nov-24-07 09:58 PM |
#37 |
| -
Poll #374 which shows us Hillary can't win. |
Alexander |
Nov-24-07 10:12 PM |
#43 |
| -
Hillary can't lose. Here's her excellent record... |
Perry Logan |
Nov-25-07 06:55 AM |
#48 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread