You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #6: So I should just pretend the statement was true? .. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. So I should just pretend the statement was true? ..
"we know that a Democratic presidential victory in 2008 will ensure that goal"

or should I have just skipped the thread altogether?

I really thought I did try to honor the spirit, by not naming names or discussing specific candidates,
but geez .. now I'm confused.

sorry if i offended anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Circular Firing Squad McCamy Taylor  Nov-18-07 11:46 PM   #0 
  - Yes, a war is the number one issue...  Mythsaje   Nov-18-07 11:49 PM   #1 
  - K and R to the max.  oasis   Nov-18-07 11:52 PM   #2 
  - Without mentioning any names, I don't buy your premise  Impeachment_Monkey   Nov-19-07 12:14 AM   #3 
  - Can't you honor what the OP has asked for  ruggerson   Nov-19-07 12:19 AM   #4 
  - So I should just pretend the statement was true? ..  Impeachment_Monkey   Nov-19-07 12:25 AM   #6 
  - You'd prefer 50 years from now?  NBachers   Nov-19-07 02:09 AM   #9 
  - No, Hillary clarified her original statement..  Tellurian   Nov-19-07 08:23 AM   #25 
  - if "ideologically pure" means say what they do, do what they say.. then yes  Impeachment_Monkey   Nov-19-07 11:00 AM   #28 
  - Maybe that person is being more honest than anyone else.  pnwmom   Nov-19-07 03:32 AM   #15 
     - hmm. now where have I heard that line before?  Impeachment_Monkey   Nov-19-07 11:02 AM   #29 
        - That's just more of Bush, trying to prove he's still "relevant."  pnwmom   Nov-19-07 11:07 AM   #30 
           - But you should give a damn if Dem Prez. candidate(s) is(are) listening to his crap. n/t  Impeachment_Monkey   Nov-19-07 11:50 AM   #31 
              - I don't believe Bush for one second, and I don't know why anyone else would.  pnwmom   Nov-19-07 12:42 PM   #32 
  - McCarthy & we voters drove LBJ out of the race  msedano   Nov-19-07 12:25 AM   #5 
  - I don't think any of THESE Democrats (except Kucinich) will end the war.  Usrename   Nov-19-07 12:48 AM   #7 
  - It is still early in the primaries.  leftrightwingnut   Nov-19-07 02:03 AM   #8 
  - I considered this. There are degrees of infighting. I have followed a lot  McCamy Taylor   Nov-19-07 02:35 AM   #12 
     - Well, you pretty much pegged yourself with that post.  leftrightwingnut   Nov-19-07 04:04 AM   #17 
        - The person who introduced me to the DU, erma, never posted once...  niceypoo   Nov-19-07 08:14 AM   #24 
  - LBJ wouldn't have been a shoo-in. He was terribly unpopular.  MADem   Nov-19-07 02:12 AM   #10 
  - Bring The Troops Home Yes - Vote For Hillary, No ---- Why  lostnotforgotten   Nov-19-07 02:20 AM   #11 
  - Then you're no better than the Nader crowd who bought the lie  pnwmom   Nov-19-07 03:29 AM   #14 
     - Name Calling Is Against DU Rules - Do I Need To Report You?  lostnotforgotten   Nov-19-07 05:38 AM   #18 
     - You must spend a lot of time reporting,  pnwmom   Nov-19-07 05:47 AM   #19 
        - I Get Tired Of Democratic Police Like Yourself Telling Me What To Think  lostnotforgotten   Nov-19-07 06:01 AM   #22 
  - What a great piece. Thanks for your work. Recommended. n/t  pnwmom   Nov-19-07 03:27 AM   #13 
  - Only agree with "circular firing squds" in terms of...  HardWorkingDem   Nov-19-07 03:33 AM   #16 
  - You make a good point  Armstead   Nov-19-07 08:23 AM   #26 
  - If you're worried about the 2008 election, you worry too much.  Perry Logan   Nov-19-07 05:48 AM   #20 
  - Not so fast...remember 2000, remember 2004?  K Gardner   Nov-19-07 08:11 PM   #34 
  - Bravo,McCamy !  sufrommich   Nov-19-07 05:59 AM   #21 
  - I think that we need a good, healthy, vigorous debate  riqster   Nov-19-07 07:38 AM   #23 
  - Your OP is absolutely spot on McCamy..  Tellurian   Nov-19-07 08:28 AM   #27 
  - Hear, hear!  Laelth   Nov-19-07 08:05 PM   #33 
  - Bravo ! 100% in agreement. n/t  K Gardner   Nov-19-07 08:12 PM   #35 
  - 2008 might end up being 1932 again  RobertSeattle   Nov-19-07 10:17 PM   #36 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC