You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: What was personal? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. What was personal?
Where did someone attack her because for anything in her personal life, anything that wasn't directly related to her qualifications for being President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -"Kate Michelman-- tackles Clinton for 'playing the victim' with gender card" wndycty  Nov-03-07 06:16 PM   #0 
  - An attack from one of Edwards top staffers is "news"??  MethuenProgressive   Nov-03-07 06:19 PM   #1 
  - Why Doesn't The Gentleman Tout The Virtues Of His Own Candidate Rather Than Carp About The Alleged  DemocratSinceBirth   Nov-03-07 06:22 PM   #2 
  - Candidates and their surrogates do this all the time.  ClarkUSA   Nov-03-07 06:32 PM   #5 
     - Actually The Big Dog Didn't Bash Dems In 92  DemocratSinceBirth   Nov-03-07 06:38 PM   #7 
        - Clinton bashed Tsongus, Brown and Kerrey  karynnj   Nov-03-07 10:02 PM   #34 
        - Big Dog has never bashed ANYBODY. Ever!  Rageneau   Nov-04-07 01:28 PM   #48 
        - He said Jerry Brown wasn't fit to stand on a stage with Hillary, and said it in a debate  PurityOfEssence   Nov-04-07 02:31 AM   #43 
  - And whatever we do, lets not dicusss when Edwards played the gender card and derided Hillary ...  Maribelle   Nov-03-07 06:30 PM   #3 
  - Yes, what WAS that remark about her suit about?  DemBones DemBones   Nov-03-07 07:07 PM   #15 
  - I don't remember him saying anything about the color of the jacket  Debi   Nov-04-07 10:19 AM   #46 
  - He didn't. It was a "joke" Pehaps in response to what don'y you like about your opponet he should  saracat   Nov-03-07 07:18 PM   #16 
  - Maybe you thought it was a joke. So? He still played the gender card to many.  Maribelle   Nov-03-07 07:22 PM   #17 
  - It was thought of as a joke by nearly all who watched. in fact media reviewers complimented Edwards  saracat   Nov-03-07 07:26 PM   #20 
     - Bull. Many media reviews felt as I did at the time. He played the gender card. n/t  Maribelle   Nov-03-07 07:29 PM   #21 
        - Bull.  saracat   Nov-03-07 07:32 PM   #24 
           - pundits gave Edwards a dressing down for the crack  Maribelle   Nov-03-07 07:34 PM   # 
  - a "joke" minimizing a woman--reducing her to what she looks like  Evergreen Emerald   Nov-04-07 01:33 PM   #49 
  - Or when his wife decried poor John not being a woman or black, therefore  The Count   Nov-03-07 07:34 PM   #25 
  - Excellent Point. Thanks n/t  Maribelle   Nov-03-07 07:35 PM   #26 
  - I didn't take it that way - the question forced them to say something they  karynnj   Nov-03-07 10:04 PM   #35 
  - Please see post #46 - he never said anything about the color of her suit. n/t  Debi   Nov-04-07 10:55 AM   #47 
  - Advisor.  Catchawave   Nov-03-07 06:30 PM   #4 
  - And a paid staff member of Edwards Campaign:  MethuenProgressive   Nov-03-07 07:06 PM   #14 
  - You mean like Shelton last time around? yeah, we know this trick.  The Count   Nov-03-07 07:51 PM   #29 
  - Key difference is that Michaelman is not a candidate, Clinton is.  DemBones DemBones   Nov-03-07 06:51 PM   #9 
     - Her bona fides is adviser to the campaign of the white man who failed to vote  The Count   Nov-03-07 07:36 PM   #27 
  - This is where I get to reverse the role  BuffyTheFundieSlayer   Nov-03-07 06:33 PM   #6 
  - Obama never played the race card  Bullet1987   Nov-03-07 06:49 PM   #8 
     - Obama is hated so, they feel they have license to make shit up. . .  wndycty   Nov-03-07 06:53 PM   #11 
     - He did, repeatedly  BuffyTheFundieSlayer   Nov-03-07 07:02 PM   #13 
  - Full context of Kate's statement on OpenLeft, here:  Catchawave   Nov-03-07 06:52 PM   #10 
  - I wonder what her nickname is at DU. nt  Jim4Wes   Nov-03-07 06:54 PM   #12 
  - Good point. All the other operatives are here - why not her?  The Count   Nov-03-07 07:32 PM   #23 
  - Perhaps you can call Kate Michelman "dereanged"too!  saracat   Nov-03-07 07:23 PM   #18 
  - Not deranged, just opportunistic.  The Count   Nov-03-07 07:31 PM   #22 
  - Didn't Edwards use in 2004 that POS Shelton to question Clark's integrity?  The Count   Nov-03-07 07:26 PM   #19 
  - Its no wonder this party can't win an election  Jim4Wes   Nov-03-07 07:37 PM   #28 
  - What was personal?  sandnsea   Nov-03-07 09:45 PM   #30 
     - Character nt  Jim4Wes   Nov-03-07 09:51 PM   #31 
        - That's a qualification for the job  sandnsea   Nov-03-07 09:56 PM   #32 
           - I don't recall it getting this nasty  Jim4Wes   Nov-03-07 10:50 PM   #36 
              - Against Clark???  sandnsea   Nov-04-07 01:08 AM   #38 
              - Oh what the hell... back at you.  Jim4Wes   Nov-04-07 01:14 AM   #40 
                 - Yeah mine too  sandnsea   Nov-04-07 01:43 AM   #41 
              - You Sir Are Correct  DemocratSinceBirth   Nov-04-07 04:40 AM   #44 
                 - Yes, but even some of the candidates used those  Jim4Wes   Nov-04-07 06:17 AM   #45 
  - Michelman knows exactly what's going on. I wish she was supporting Richardson, though.  Carrieyazel   Nov-03-07 09:58 PM   #33 
  - she is a smart cookie. I did not know she works with Edwards  rodeodance   Nov-03-07 11:19 PM   #37 
  - i "heart" the audacity of hope  sniffa   Nov-04-07 01:10 AM   #39 
  - I saw that little news conference of hers on CNN.  cat_girl25   Nov-04-07 01:57 AM   #42 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC