Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-01-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. I personally don't see anything wrong with her answers. |
|
I think you could do what you're trying to do here with Edwards' and Obama's answers. Hillary came across far more clearlly to me in that debate than either of those candidates did.
In fact, I believe the only candidate who did better than Hillary was Biden.
|
| -Tuesday's debate and the real danger of a Hillary Clinton nomination |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 04:51 PM |
#0 |
 -
The American public thought John Kerry won all three debates with Bush, |
Eric J in MN |
Nov-01-07 04:55 PM |
#1 |
 -
Um...except that Kerry actually won the election |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 04:56 PM |
#2 |
| -
And Kerry cut Bush's lead by around 10 points |
Bleachers7 |
Nov-01-07 04:59 PM |
#5 |
 -
Good point. Bush really tanked after that first debate |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:01 PM |
#7 |
| -
I don't follow you...are you implying that a poor performance in the debates is a good thing? |
earthlover |
Nov-01-07 08:59 PM |
#65 |
| -
No, but I don't think Hillary Clinton was all that bad the other night, |
Eric J in MN |
Nov-01-07 10:38 PM |
#68 |
| -
It was HOW she did poorly that was potentially devestating |
earthlover |
Nov-02-07 06:17 AM |
#69 |
| -
Here's my hope--that IF she wins, she will come out of her permanent |
wienerdoggie |
Nov-01-07 04:57 PM |
#3 |
| -
That's everybody's hope. But then there's always the run for a second term... |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 04:58 PM |
#4 |
| -
That's not going to happen- she is what she is. |
Katzenkavalier |
Nov-01-07 09:03 PM |
#66 |
| -
bwahahah |
cali |
Nov-01-07 05:00 PM |
#6 |
| -
Losing arguments seems to be turning you nasty. |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:03 PM |
#9 |
| -
Jgraz, don't look now but.. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:17 PM |
#17 |
| -
Thanks Lirwin. I know how much your opinion is valued on this board. |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
I personally don't see anything wrong with her answers. |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:02 PM |
#8 |
| -
I agree these answers aren't so bad. |
Eric J in MN |
Nov-01-07 05:06 PM |
#11 |
| -
When the audience laughs derisively at you, it's a bad answer |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:08 PM |
#13 |
| -
Erm.. did you actually WATCH the debate? Or have you only read the transcript? |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
Uh..ok. Just keep saying that and it may begin to sound believable |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:12 PM |
#15 |
| -
Alrighty |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:16 PM |
#16 |
| -
Let's see. Who else thinks the audience was laughing at Russert? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:18 PM |
#18 |
| -
yeah, I just posted as much just below |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:22 PM |
#21 |
| -
Here's a link to the exchange.. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:23 PM |
#22 |
| -
ha...one clap is not "applause" |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:27 PM |
#24 |
| -
One clap? |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:29 PM |
#26 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-01-07 05:34 PM |
#32 |
| -
That's wierd. Non-Hillary people are supporting what I am saying |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:34 PM |
#33 |
| -
You realize people can actually just look at the posts, don't you |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:36 PM |
#35 |
| -
Oh ok |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:38 PM |
#36 |
| -
And the rest of us don't care. Why don't you post another thread on her immigration answer? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:42 PM |
#37 |
| -
Aww poor Jgraz. Now he "doesn't care" and changes the subject. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:43 PM |
#38 |
| -
My evaluation hasn't changed. What I don't care about is your blowing up of a side issue |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:48 PM |
#40 |
| -
No, you were the one who brought it up |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:50 PM |
#41 |
| -
Hokay, Lirwin. Get back to me when your little thread gets more than two people agreeing with you |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:54 PM |
#43 |
| -
Sure thing! |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:56 PM |
#44 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-01-07 06:14 PM |
#47 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-01-07 06:18 PM |
#49 |
| -
I think the audience was laughing with her, not at her. |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:20 PM |
#20 |
| -
Then why did the laughter start in response to her answer and not to Russert's question? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:23 PM |
#23 |
| -
Go and watch the video, and see for yourself |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:28 PM |
#25 |
| -
The audience starts laughing as she answer's the question for the third time |
Skip Intro |
Nov-01-07 05:29 PM |
#27 |
| -
Exactly |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 05:33 PM |
#31 |
| -
You're the one slow on the uptake. nt |
2rth2pwr |
Nov-01-07 06:02 PM |
#45 |
| -
Oooh...the Rubber/Glue response. Whatever will I do? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 06:16 PM |
#48 |
| -
Your not bad at the comebacks |
2rth2pwr |
Nov-01-07 07:03 PM |
#54 |
| -
They laughed with her. Get it? |
emilyg |
Nov-01-07 06:54 PM |
#53 |
| -
The real danger is that Hillary will do a great job & make a lot |
The_Casual_Observer |
Nov-01-07 05:05 PM |
#10 |
| -
There isn't one Hillary detractor on this board who wouldn't want her to succeed as president |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:07 PM |
#12 |
| -
Totally Irrelevant Supposition |
The River |
Nov-01-07 05:31 PM |
#29 |
| -
This would not be a good showing in a GE debate... |
bunnies |
Nov-01-07 05:30 PM |
#28 |
| -
That may be so... to a degree. |
MGKrebs |
Nov-01-07 06:25 PM |
#51 |
| -
I think adversaries want lots and lots of details to use as ammunition. |
Sparkly |
Nov-01-07 05:32 PM |
#30 |
| -
danger! |
Enrique |
Nov-01-07 05:35 PM |
#34 |
| -
Pennsylvania: Clinton Opens Double Digit Leads |
cali |
Nov-01-07 05:47 PM |
#39 |
| -
Did you mean to post this as an independent thread? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 05:51 PM |
#42 |
| -
No I didn't, and yes I think it's germane to your OP |
cali |
Nov-01-07 06:07 PM |
#46 |
| -
Once again, reading comprehension bites you in the ass |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 06:23 PM |
#50 |
| -
I don't think you get it, and clearly the fact that practically no one |
cali |
Nov-01-07 06:49 PM |
#52 |
| -
Starting a post with a clearly false assertion doesn't gain you any points |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 07:06 PM |
#55 |
| -
one false statement after another is what YOU are doing. |
cali |
Nov-01-07 07:21 PM |
#56 |
| -
NOW you're playing the vicitm card? |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 08:01 PM |
#59 |
| -
Well, I said I wasn't going to respond, and here I am. |
cali |
Nov-01-07 08:18 PM |
#60 |
| -
Here's where we started |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 08:23 PM |
#61 |
| -
OK, I snarked in that thread. But that's hardly where we started. |
cali |
Nov-01-07 08:31 PM |
#62 |
| -
Note the change in tone following that comment |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 08:43 PM |
#63 |
| -
LOL! That's probably true, and thank the gods for |
cali |
Nov-01-07 08:47 PM |
#64 |
| -
Jgraz, give it a rest. You look more and more foolish after each post. nm. |
Lirwin2 |
Nov-01-07 07:55 PM |
#57 |
| -
Thanks Lirwin. I really spend a lot of time worrying about what you think |
jgraz |
Nov-01-07 07:59 PM |
#58 |
| -
It will be awhile before any damage done is going to show up. then we will know. |
illinoisprogressive |
Nov-01-07 09:08 PM |
#67 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread