You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #2: Um...except that Kerry actually won the election [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Um...except that Kerry actually won the election
Are you saying that debates don't count because the election could be stolen? That doesn't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Tuesday's debate and the real danger of a Hillary Clinton nomination jgraz  Nov-01-07 04:51 PM   #0 
  - The American public thought John Kerry won all three debates with Bush,  Eric J in MN   Nov-01-07 04:55 PM   #1 
  - Um...except that Kerry actually won the election  jgraz   Nov-01-07 04:56 PM   #2 
  - And Kerry cut Bush's lead by around 10 points  Bleachers7   Nov-01-07 04:59 PM   #5 
  - Good point. Bush really tanked after that first debate  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:01 PM   #7 
  - I don't follow you...are you implying that a poor performance in the debates is a good thing?  earthlover   Nov-01-07 08:59 PM   #65 
     - No, but I don't think Hillary Clinton was all that bad the other night,  Eric J in MN   Nov-01-07 10:38 PM   #68 
        - It was HOW she did poorly that was potentially devestating  earthlover   Nov-02-07 06:17 AM   #69 
  - Here's my hope--that IF she wins, she will come out of her permanent  wienerdoggie   Nov-01-07 04:57 PM   #3 
  - That's everybody's hope. But then there's always the run for a second term...  jgraz   Nov-01-07 04:58 PM   #4 
  - That's not going to happen- she is what she is.  Katzenkavalier   Nov-01-07 09:03 PM   #66 
  - bwahahah  cali   Nov-01-07 05:00 PM   #6 
  - Losing arguments seems to be turning you nasty.  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:03 PM   #9 
     - Jgraz, don't look now but..  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:17 PM   #17 
        - Thanks Lirwin. I know how much your opinion is valued on this board.  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:19 PM   #19 
  - I personally don't see anything wrong with her answers.  Skip Intro   Nov-01-07 05:02 PM   #8 
  - I agree these answers aren't so bad.  Eric J in MN   Nov-01-07 05:06 PM   #11 
     - When the audience laughs derisively at you, it's a bad answer  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:08 PM   #13 
        - Erm.. did you actually WATCH the debate? Or have you only read the transcript?  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:11 PM   #14 
        - Uh..ok. Just keep saying that and it may begin to sound believable  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:12 PM   #15 
           - Alrighty  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:16 PM   #16 
              - Let's see. Who else thinks the audience was laughing at Russert?  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:18 PM   #18 
                 - yeah, I just posted as much just below  Skip Intro   Nov-01-07 05:22 PM   #21 
                 - Here's a link to the exchange..  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:23 PM   #22 
                    - clap is not "applause"  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:27 PM   #24 
                       - One clap?  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:29 PM   #26 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-01-07 05:34 PM   #32 
                             - That's wierd. Non-Hillary people are supporting what I am saying  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:34 PM   #33 
                                - You realize people can actually just look at the posts, don't you  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:36 PM   #35 
                                   - Oh ok  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:38 PM   #36 
                                      - And the rest of us don't care. Why don't you post another thread on her immigration answer?  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:42 PM   #37 
                                         - Aww poor Jgraz. Now he "doesn't care" and changes the subject.  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:43 PM   #38 
                                            - My evaluation hasn't changed. What I don't care about is your blowing up of a side issue  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:48 PM   #40 
                                               - No, you were the one who brought it up  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:50 PM   #41 
                                                  - Hokay, Lirwin. Get back to me when your little thread gets more than two people agreeing with you  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:54 PM   #43 
                                                  - Sure thing!  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:56 PM   #44 
                                                  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-01-07 06:14 PM   #47 
                                                  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-01-07 06:18 PM   #49 
        - I think the audience was laughing with her, not at her.  Skip Intro   Nov-01-07 05:20 PM   #20 
        - Then why did the laughter start in response to her answer and not to Russert's question?  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:23 PM   #23 
           - Go and watch the video, and see for yourself  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:28 PM   #25 
           - The audience starts laughing as she answer's the question for the third time  Skip Intro   Nov-01-07 05:29 PM   #27 
           - Exactly  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 05:33 PM   #31 
           - You're the one slow on the uptake. nt  2rth2pwr   Nov-01-07 06:02 PM   #45 
              - Oooh...the Rubber/Glue response. Whatever will I do?  jgraz   Nov-01-07 06:16 PM   #48 
                 - Your not bad at the comebacks  2rth2pwr   Nov-01-07 07:03 PM   #54 
        - They laughed with her. Get it?  emilyg   Nov-01-07 06:54 PM   #53 
  - The real danger is that Hillary will do a great job & make a lot  The_Casual_Observer   Nov-01-07 05:05 PM   #10 
  - There isn't one Hillary detractor on this board who wouldn't want her to succeed as president  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:07 PM   #12 
  - Totally Irrelevant Supposition  The River   Nov-01-07 05:31 PM   #29 
  - This would not be a good showing in a GE debate...  bunnies   Nov-01-07 05:30 PM   #28 
  - That may be so... to a degree.  MGKrebs   Nov-01-07 06:25 PM   #51 
  - I think adversaries want lots and lots of details to use as ammunition.  Sparkly   Nov-01-07 05:32 PM   #30 
  - danger!  Enrique   Nov-01-07 05:35 PM   #34 
  - Pennsylvania: Clinton Opens Double Digit Leads  cali   Nov-01-07 05:47 PM   #39 
  - Did you mean to post this as an independent thread?  jgraz   Nov-01-07 05:51 PM   #42 
     - No I didn't, and yes I think it's germane to your OP  cali   Nov-01-07 06:07 PM   #46 
        - Once again, reading comprehension bites you in the ass  jgraz   Nov-01-07 06:23 PM   #50 
           - I don't think you get it, and clearly the fact that practically no one  cali   Nov-01-07 06:49 PM   #52 
              - Starting a post with a clearly false assertion doesn't gain you any points  jgraz   Nov-01-07 07:06 PM   #55 
                 - one false statement after another is what YOU are doing.  cali   Nov-01-07 07:21 PM   #56 
                 - NOW you're playing the vicitm card?  jgraz   Nov-01-07 08:01 PM   #59 
                    - Well, I said I wasn't going to respond, and here I am.  cali   Nov-01-07 08:18 PM   #60 
                       - Here's where we started  jgraz   Nov-01-07 08:23 PM   #61 
                          - OK, I snarked in that thread. But that's hardly where we started.  cali   Nov-01-07 08:31 PM   #62 
                             - Note the change in tone following that comment  jgraz   Nov-01-07 08:43 PM   #63 
                                - LOL! That's probably true, and thank the gods for  cali   Nov-01-07 08:47 PM   #64 
                 - Jgraz, give it a rest. You look more and more foolish after each post. nm.  Lirwin2   Nov-01-07 07:55 PM   #57 
                    - Thanks Lirwin. I really spend a lot of time worrying about what you think  jgraz   Nov-01-07 07:59 PM   #58 
  - It will be awhile before any damage done is going to show up. then we will know.  illinoisprogressive   Nov-01-07 09:08 PM   #67 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC