You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #71: Yes, the media would never attack Clinton about her cleavage [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. Yes, the media would never attack Clinton about her cleavage
her hair, etc until after she wins the nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Rupert Murdoch held a fundraiser for Hillary. Where was the outrage? jenmito  Oct-30-07 11:23 AM   #0 
  - And there in lies the problem with a Hillary Presidency... You just know if...  LakeSamish706   Oct-30-07 11:27 AM   #1 
  - Because they is no parity in candidate accountability.Some think Hillary is not accountable for  saracat   Oct-30-07 11:27 AM   #2 
  - Rupert Murdoch is trying to buy her off. n/t  Selatius   Oct-30-07 11:28 AM   #3 
  - SC Co-chairs voted to ban gay marriage  sandnsea   Oct-30-07 11:30 AM   #4 
  - Could you please post this over at DailyKos too?  Sick_of_Rethuggery   Oct-30-07 01:12 PM   #57 
  - we aren't hillary supporters. we don't even understand hillary supporters.  robinlynne   Oct-30-07 11:33 AM   #5 
  - You Obama apologists still don't get it, do you?  joeybee12   Oct-30-07 11:37 AM   #6 
  - If you're not a Hillary supporter, this is not about you.  jenmito   Oct-30-07 11:43 AM   #10 
     - Perhaps because Obama supporters are so desperate to portray this as a Clinton thing.  rinsd   Oct-30-07 11:50 AM   #18 
     - Huh? Murdoch's fundraiser WAS a Clinton thing!  jenmito   Oct-30-07 11:55 AM   #20 
     - This is hilarious.  rinsd   Oct-30-07 12:01 PM   #23 
     - You are right  kenfrequed   Oct-30-07 02:04 PM   #59 
        - Hear hear!  FatDave   Oct-30-07 03:28 PM   #61 
           - Damn right!  Heywoodj   Oct-31-07 01:18 PM   #88 
     - Ooh, there ya go making sense. intellectual honesty, IMO, would require a mia culpa on their side.  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 05:07 PM   #74 
     - The fundraiser was back in 2006 for Hillary's Senate campaign  creeksneakers2   Oct-30-07 05:21 PM   #76 
     - Because everything that rings true and negative about HRC is played down by the M$M ... for now.  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 04:39 PM   #67 
        - Yes, the media would never attack Clinton about her cleavage  cuke   Oct-30-07 04:55 PM   #71 
           - Oh my cuke, that's mild ... you ain't seen nothing yet! ... and I hope we don't. n/t  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 05:06 PM   #73 
              - I'm sure they would go easy on the other Dems  cuke   Oct-30-07 05:08 PM   #75 
                 - The attacks on Gore and Kerry will be a picnic in comparison to what  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 06:08 PM   #77 
                    - I, too, am certain they held back against Gore and Kerry  cuke   Oct-30-07 06:09 PM   #78 
     - I think you're reading too much into your tea leafs.  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:10 PM   #31 
  - Did they promote homophobia at the fundraiser?  cuke   Oct-30-07 11:37 AM   #7 
  - Is Murdoch for gay rights?  jenmito   Oct-30-07 11:46 AM   #13 
     - Did they promote homophobia at the fundraiser?  cuke   Oct-30-07 11:49 AM   #17 
     - My husband works for Direct TV  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:12 PM   #32 
     - I believe Murdoch gives beneits to domestic partners  cuke   Oct-30-07 01:01 PM   #55 
     - Murdoch doesn't appear to be for  truedelphi   Oct-30-07 03:23 PM   #60 
  - I have seen many threads of outrage over this. I have EVEN  jonnyblitz   Oct-30-07 11:41 AM   #8 
  - So when you all keep posting "bigot" threads about Obama, we should just ignore them  jenmito   Oct-30-07 11:51 AM   #19 
     - It. Ain't. Just. Hillary. Supporters.  FredScuttle   Oct-30-07 12:02 PM   #24 
        - I. Know. That.  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:10 PM   #30 
           - It's always about her supporters isn't it?  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:13 PM   #35 
           - No. Only when it applies to her.  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:17 PM   #39 
              - Suuuuure it is!  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:20 PM   #42 
           - Like I said, enjoy your pissing match with the Hillary brigade  FredScuttle   Oct-30-07 12:14 PM   #36 
  - Ummm there was outrage here for the Murdoch fundraiser in 2006.  rinsd   Oct-30-07 11:43 AM   #9 
  - there were tons of it.  wyldwolf   Oct-30-07 11:44 AM   #11 
  - The Famous 'Murdoch Fund-Raiser', Ma'am  The Magistrate   Oct-30-07 11:44 AM   #12 
  - That's what I thought. I was wondering if there had been some more recent fundraiser  ElizabethDC   Oct-30-07 11:46 AM   #14 
  - Of course I'm talking about the one in 2006. Does the time matter? Does that mean  jenmito   Oct-30-07 11:58 AM   #22 
     - Well, since that's the one you're referring to, it should be noted that there was plenty of  ElizabethDC   Oct-30-07 06:11 PM   #79 
  - I didn't know that,  seasonedblue   Oct-30-07 11:46 AM   #15 
  - Jenmito could be referring to the fundraiser Murdoch held in 2006 for her Senate campaign.  rinsd   Oct-30-07 11:47 AM   #16 
     - Yes I am. And the REASON I mentioned it today was because Jesse Jackson mentioned it today  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:06 PM   #28 
     - You claimed there was no outrage which was not true.  rinsd   Oct-30-07 12:13 PM   #33 
        - By Hillary supporters?  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:15 PM   #37 
           - Obama supporters are railing against this concert?  rinsd   Oct-30-07 12:22 PM   #45 
              - Then you obviously missed this:  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:24 PM   #47 
                 - I did miss that.  rinsd   Oct-30-07 12:29 PM   #49 
                    - Thanks.  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:45 PM   #50 
     - It was for her presidential campaign. nt  spotbird   Oct-30-07 04:17 PM   #62 
        - No, it wasn't. The fundraiser was in '06, and Hillary didn't start running for president until '07.  ElizabethDC   Oct-30-07 06:13 PM   #80 
           - You are wrong. nt  spotbird   Oct-30-07 06:49 PM   #83 
  - I think people have "Hillary outrage exhaustion."  Perry Logan   Oct-30-07 11:56 AM   #21 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-30-07 12:04 PM   #25 
  - Yawwwwwn!  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:16 PM   #38 
  - Is Rupert Murdoch A Gay Basher?  DemocratSinceBirth   Oct-30-07 12:05 PM   #26 
  - Do you think he SUPPORTS gay rights?  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:13 PM   #34 
     - See message #32  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:17 PM   #40 
        - I did. And?  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:19 PM   #41 
           - You can't see beyond your hate for Clinton.  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:20 PM   #43 
              - Yes I can.  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:22 PM   #46 
  - Is that you saracat? nt  2rth2pwr   Oct-30-07 12:05 PM   #27 
  - Go back and look.  ronnykmarshall   Oct-30-07 12:08 PM   #29 
  - From Hillary supporters?  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:21 PM   #44 
     - Are you outraged by Obama's Gospel Tour?  cuke   Oct-30-07 12:25 PM   #48 
        - Like I said up-thread, I guess you missed this:  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:47 PM   #51 
           - That's it  cuke   Oct-30-07 12:54 PM   #53 
              - Is that a question, "That's it?"  jenmito   Oct-30-07 12:57 PM   #54 
  - Rupert never credited God with curing him of liberaliam. n/t  NoPasaran   Oct-30-07 12:48 PM   #52 
  - That's because he's not pretending not to be a liberal...  jenmito   Oct-30-07 01:04 PM   #56 
  - No, he just ORDERS non-stop broadcasts of fear-mongering & authoritarian-adoring FASCIST propaganda  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 04:49 PM   #69 
     - unlike those other liberal news shows  cuke   Oct-30-07 06:13 PM   #81 
  - The majority of the M$M is controlled by the repugs so no wonder it's  Imagevision   Oct-30-07 01:14 PM   #58 
  - Is Hillary supporting more media consolidation?  Lone_Wolf   Oct-30-07 04:33 PM   #63 
  - Oh, I'm way disappointed but I have yet to "perfect" my overt protestations and  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 04:34 PM   #64 
  - I think the outrage is that  Jim4Wes   Oct-30-07 04:36 PM   #65 
  - Murdoch had lunch with Al Gore before the 2004 election  cat_girl25   Oct-30-07 04:38 PM   #66 
  - Correct me if I'm wrong, but "having lunch" is not equal to "having a fundraiser for"?  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 04:43 PM   #68 
     - If Murdoch is stupid enough to give a fundraiser for Hillary, then  cat_girl25   Oct-30-07 04:55 PM   #72 
        - Please. Why ar you excusing this?  jenmito   Oct-30-07 06:24 PM   #82 
        - I don't know why he gave her a fundraiser.  cat_girl25   Oct-30-07 08:54 PM   #86 
        - Murdoch did not become a multi-billionaire by behaving stupid in ANY way ... he's an ideologue  ShortnFiery   Oct-30-07 08:50 PM   #85 
           - You're right. He's not stupid.  cat_girl25   Oct-30-07 08:58 PM   #87 
  - The only reason Murdoch held a fundraiser for Senator Clinton  janx   Oct-30-07 04:53 PM   #70 
  - I remember expressing outrage at the time  eridani   Oct-30-07 08:10 PM   #84 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC