You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #61: Because it's a disingenous accusation. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Because it's a disingenous accusation.
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 07:56 PM by LoZoccolo
That's why.

On edit: chose "disingenous" as a synonym for another word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Is Edwards going to have to ask Clinton if he still has the chicken suit? AP  Feb-19-04 05:15 PM   #0 
  - I would hope  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:16 PM   #1 
  - It made Bush look stupid. It was a great "stunt."  AP   Feb-19-04 05:17 PM   #3 
  - I presume you're talking about  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:19 PM   #7 
     - What reasonable explanation could Kerry give to explain why he wouldn't  AP   Feb-19-04 05:23 PM   #13 
        - Here's a very reasonable explanation...  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:29 PM   #15 
           - Bwaaaaak, bwaaak, bwaaak...cluck, cluck, cluck...  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:31 PM   #16 
           - Nice adult response  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:33 PM   #19 
           - If he's not a coward, he should debate.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:34 PM   #21 
              - Nonsense...  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:36 PM   #22 
                 - You haven't addressed my argument, either, so why should I?  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:38 PM   #28 
                 - You're mistaken  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:40 PM   # 
                    - No, you're mistaken.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:41 PM   #38 
                       - I said you were mistaken  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:43 PM   #42 
                          - And I said YOU were mistaken.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:45 PM   #45 
                 - "Kerry haters"??? I don't hate Kerry. I like Edwards more.  AP   Feb-19-04 05:38 PM   #30 
                 - Ummmmm well.............  GodHelpUsAll2   Feb-19-04 09:02 PM   #63 
           - Wait! I know the answer to this, I've heard it before.  rock   Feb-19-04 05:48 PM   #46 
              - What gave it away?  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:49 PM   #48 
           - That sounds vaguely like Scalia's logic in Gore v Bush.  AP   Feb-19-04 05:34 PM   #20 
  - I'd hope Sen. Kerry would show that he has a real set, and debate, too.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:17 PM   #4 
     - the implication  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:20 PM   #10 
        - Then he needs to debate Sen. Edwards 1:1.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:23 PM   #12 
           - hold on  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:32 PM   #18 
              - If Kerry says he'll only debate if Sharpton and Ku do too, fine.  AP   Feb-19-04 05:36 PM   #23 
              - I haven't changed my position at all.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:36 PM   #24 
                 - nonsense.  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:37 PM   #27 
                    - Are you changing your position now?  AP   Feb-19-04 05:39 PM   #33 
                    - please read carefully  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:41 PM   #37 
                       - So you agree that further debates would only help Edwards?  AP   Feb-19-04 05:48 PM   #47 
                          - Nope.. I didn't say that either  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:52 PM   #52 
                             - I don't know if Kerry has refused, but his people dodged the question last  AP   Feb-19-04 05:57 PM   #54 
                    - Nonsense back at ya, bro! In that thread *I* was not.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:40 PM   #34 
                       - Well  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:43 PM   # 
                          - No, I was apoplectic that Kucinich and Sharpton would be excluded...  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:44 PM   #43 
                             - A distinction without a difference  Dookus   Feb-19-04 05:50 PM   #49 
                                - A legitimate distinction.  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:52 PM   #51 
  - Could Bush get away without debating Edwards?  leyton   Feb-19-04 05:16 PM   #2 
  - It's not only Bush I'm talking about.  AP   Feb-19-04 05:19 PM   #6 
  - I do remember that  lancdem   Feb-19-04 05:17 PM   #5 
  - Hahaha!  Meldread   Feb-19-04 05:19 PM   #8 
  - I doubt if it would be a debate.  Skwmom   Feb-19-04 05:19 PM   #9 
  - So you're saying they shouldn't debate?  AP   Feb-19-04 05:22 PM   #11 
     - Kerry would be crazy to go along with this.  Skwmom   Feb-19-04 05:39 PM   #32 
        - Set up? It's Edwards asking for it, and I don't see that he's got a lot of  AP   Feb-19-04 05:40 PM   #35 
  - Well, it gives Edwards or Kerry an issue if Bush refuses to debate.  elperromagico   Feb-19-04 05:26 PM   #14 
  - It would be disrespectful to the other candidates...  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 05:32 PM   #17 
  - OK, let's invite the other candidates. But if they can't make it, Kerry  AP   Feb-19-04 05:37 PM   #26 
  - So you admit...  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 05:40 PM   #36 
     - Didn't say that. But I am liking the idea of a duck suit.  AP   Feb-19-04 05:41 PM   #39 
        - Quack, quack!  Cuban_Liberal   Feb-19-04 05:43 PM   #41 
  - We have already had over 15 debates and over 15 primaries  sgr2   Feb-19-04 05:38 PM   #31 
  - New challenges call for new strategies, no chicken....a DUCK  sgr2   Feb-19-04 05:36 PM   #25 
  - Having picked up your real meaning, I have this to say:  elperromagico   Feb-19-04 05:38 PM   #29 
  - OK, invite all of them. But if any don't show up, Kerry can't back out.  AP   Feb-19-04 05:43 PM   #40 
     - Fine with me. But I doubt Kucinich or Sharpton would miss a debate.  elperromagico   Feb-19-04 05:45 PM   #44 
  - WARNING: before getting fumed about this thread...  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 05:51 PM   #50 
  - And don't miss this one either:  AP   Feb-19-04 05:54 PM   #53 
     - This actually fits what you were talking about before.  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 06:03 PM   #55 
        - Where have I said Sharpton should be excluded? I'm saying that Kerry  AP   Feb-19-04 06:25 PM   #56 
        - You didn't say that in your original post.  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 07:52 PM   #60 
           - Actually, from post #13:  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 08:04 PM   #62 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-19-04 10:44 PM   #66 
                 - This is the second time you've falsely accused me of being a racist...  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 10:53 PM   #71 
                    - This isn't about calling people racists. It's about crediblity.  AP   Feb-19-04 11:00 PM   #74 
                       - For the casual reader, I just want to point out that this post says ...  AP   Feb-19-04 11:27 PM   #75 
        - BTW, tell the truth: you don't agree wth what I was saying in that thread.  AP   Feb-19-04 06:28 PM   #57 
           - Nice try.  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 07:47 PM   #58 
           - That's an odd thread to link to, what point were you making?  sgr2   Feb-19-04 07:49 PM   #59 
              - Because it's a disingenous accusation.  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 07:54 PM   #61 
                 - Disingenuous? Do you think I would have taken that thread to 200 posts  AP   Feb-19-04 10:45 PM   #67 
                    - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-19-04 10:52 PM   #70 
                       - ...  AP   Feb-19-04 10:55 PM   #72 
           - Because they won't just delete your post, I'll respond.  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 09:10 PM   #64 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-19-04 10:50 PM   #69 
                 - Third time.  LoZoccolo   Feb-19-04 10:56 PM   #73 
  - I remember the guy in the cigar suit that followed Clinton. nt  tobius   Feb-19-04 09:12 PM   #65 
  - be careful what you wish for.  mmonk   Feb-19-04 10:46 PM   #68 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC