You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: I think you owe me an apology for implying I lied. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I think you owe me an apology for implying I lied.
Don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hillary Clinton's American Dream Initiative now available for download at the DLC website. madfloridian  Oct-21-07 02:56 PM   #0 
  - "Now" available? Been up over a year.  MethuenProgressive   Oct-21-07 02:58 PM   #1 
  - Here's the front page just recently. Now featured front page with picture  madfloridian   Oct-21-07 03:06 PM   #2 
  - "Yes, it came out last year," - madfloridian  MethuenProgressive   Oct-21-07 03:54 PM   #9 
  - Are you saying I was not honest?? I very much resent that.  madfloridian   Oct-21-07 04:22 PM   #13 
  - "Thanks for your honesty." is "calling you a liar"??  MethuenProgressive   Oct-21-07 04:34 PM   #18 
  - I think you owe me an apology for implying I lied.  madfloridian   Oct-21-07 04:29 PM   #17 
     - "Thanks for your honesty." is implying you lied??  MethuenProgressive   Oct-21-07 04:35 PM   #19 
        - Yes, it is.  madfloridian   Oct-21-07 04:39 PM   #20 
           - On This Planet?  MethuenProgressive   Oct-21-07 04:42 PM   #22 
  - Thank you so very much!  liberalnurse   Oct-21-07 03:59 PM   #11 
  - What jumped up your anal meatus?  liberalnurse   Oct-21-07 04:00 PM   #12 
  - "DLC chairman Harold Ford says the DLC will be the "policy shop" for the 08 nominee"  Yael   Oct-21-07 03:26 PM   #3 
  - I dunno.... that's actually more scary than funny.  Totally Committed   Oct-21-07 03:36 PM   #5 
  - Laugh or cry. Sometimes it is hard to pick.  Yael   Oct-21-07 03:36 PM   #6 
     - I hear THAT!  Totally Committed   Oct-21-07 03:52 PM   #8 
  - so, what policy papers are "progressives"* offering as an alternative?  wyldwolf   Oct-21-07 03:55 PM   #10 
  - The alternative is not privatizingSocial Security  martymar64   Oct-24-07 05:47 PM   #40 
  - Here ya go  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 02:05 PM   #44 
     - what?  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 02:19 PM   #45 
        - I saw plenty of papers offering solutions. You are choosing not to see them.  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 02:34 PM   #48 
           - I picked SS because that's the issue the OP stressed.  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 02:46 PM   #51 
              - EPI is also NOT agreeing with Clinton and the DLC on many things  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 03:09 PM   #55 
                 - but on retirement accounts, which is the issue of this thread, they are  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:14 PM   #56 
                    - The thread is about retirement accounts but we are in a subthread  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 03:28 PM   #64 
                       - yes, one about the lack of "progressive"* policies on retirement accounts  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:34 PM   # 
                          - You have to determine what's wrong before you can fix anything.  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 03:41 PM   #69 
                             - and 40 years of complaining equates to determining that?  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:46 PM   #71 
  - that's depressing considering the dlc is as corporate loving,  xxqqqzme   Oct-25-07 01:48 PM   #43 
  - Madfloridian - where are plans in these areas divised by "progressive"* groups?  wyldwolf   Oct-21-07 03:30 PM   #4 
  - There are quite a few groups they could have included  madfloridian   Oct-21-07 04:25 PM   #15 
     - "they" could have included?  wyldwolf   Oct-21-07 04:39 PM   #21 
        - You must not be famliar with that group.  madfloridian   Oct-21-07 04:44 PM   #23 
           - Sure I am. What I stated about them stands.  wyldwolf   Oct-21-07 04:46 PM   #24 
  - OH well you know this guy's supporters, they spend the whole day  Bitwit1234   Oct-21-07 03:37 PM   #7 
  - I am not supporting anyone. Who are you talking about?  madfloridian   Oct-21-07 04:27 PM   #16 
  - wow ....what a joke  madrchsod   Oct-21-07 04:25 PM   #14 
  - "..unprecedented coalition of progressive think tanks..."  Hell Hath No Fury   Oct-21-07 05:51 PM   #25 
  - The DLC:  LWolf   Oct-21-07 07:56 PM   #26 
  - Excellent.  Totally Committed   Oct-22-07 11:29 AM   #29 
     - That is a fun one.  LWolf   Oct-22-07 08:36 PM   #38 
  - The Social Security question ....  madfloridian   Oct-22-07 11:17 AM   #27 
  - so where's you camp's proposals?  wyldwolf   Oct-22-07 11:27 AM   #28 
     - Some thoughts.  madfloridian   Oct-22-07 12:16 PM   #30 
        - counter-thoughts  wyldwolf   Oct-22-07 12:46 PM   #31 
           - It's all in the wording. "partial dismantling" on the table now.  madfloridian   Oct-22-07 01:10 PM   #32 
              - The wording by who? ourfuture.org?  wyldwolf   Oct-22-07 01:19 PM   #33 
                 - Who misrepresented Bill Clinton? Not Dreyfuss. "partial privatization"  madfloridian   Oct-22-07 01:35 PM   #34 
                    - Again, you keep falling back on the same source which, in itself...  wyldwolf   Oct-22-07 01:45 PM   #35 
                       - Your statement is to your own shame in caring about progressive causes.  madfloridian   Oct-22-07 01:48 PM   #36 
                          - In other words, no. You can't. But as usual you find one thing I've written, show fake outrage...  wyldwolf   Oct-22-07 01:55 PM   #37 
  - Still wondering what they are up to about Social Security  madfloridian   Oct-24-07 04:04 PM   #39 
  - What does this statement mean? Still no answer.  madfloridian   Oct-25-07 01:08 PM   #41 
  - are you really expecting anyone to defend this program?  madrchsod   Oct-25-07 01:18 PM   #42 
  - what do you mean "no answer?" We went over this up thread.  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 02:21 PM   #46 
  - Yes, they are bad ideas...if you know anything about pensions  antigop   Oct-25-07 02:33 PM   #47 
     - ...but did you bother to address the second part?  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 02:36 PM   #49 
        - so what part of my post did you miss? Sorry, not playing today. I gotta go. I'm not paid to post  antigop   Oct-25-07 02:38 PM   #50 
           - the part where I asked for a "progressive"* alternative. Did you name one?  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 02:49 PM   #52 
              - The progressive alternative: LEAVE SOCIAL SECURITY ALONE  madfloridian   Oct-25-07 02:55 PM   #53 
                 - as has been repeatedly pointed out to you, these plans do not touch social security.  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:08 PM   #54 
                 - I have repeatedly pointed out to you that they are changing terminology  madfloridian   Oct-25-07 03:18 PM   #58 
                    - you;ve stated they have but you haven't shown they have.  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:22 PM   #60 
                       - Yes, I have many times. You have your own world view which exludes people like us.  madfloridian   Oct-25-07 03:38 PM   #67 
                          - links to things you've written is your proof of "changing terminologies?"  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:43 PM   #70 
                             - I have noticed you only question, you never post substantive information.  madfloridian   Oct-25-07 03:56 PM   #75 
                                - It takes numerous questions to pry clarifications and straight answers out of you  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 04:00 PM   #76 
                 - Doesn't matter what you show wyldy anyway  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 03:16 PM   #57 
                    - They also say the private accounts will divert money from Social Security  madfloridian   Oct-25-07 03:24 PM   #61 
                    - where?  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:27 PM   #63 
                    - kitty, why are you misleading people on our conversation? It's in this thread. The can check it.  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:25 PM   #62 
                       - Why don't you look at the site yourself and see  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 03:34 PM   #65 
                          - I have  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:37 PM   #66 
                             - Because really, it's not that flipping hard to look things up on the damn website yourself  thecatburgler   Oct-25-07 03:51 PM   #73 
                                - so, seeing as you went to the trouble of making the claim, why don't you do it?  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:53 PM   #74 
  - Who will not give a response?  Freddie Stubbs   Oct-25-07 03:21 PM   #59 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-25-07 03:39 PM   #68 
     - why, Q, must you always break a rule in your "discourse?"  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 03:50 PM   #72 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-25-07 04:03 PM   #77 
           - So, you say "I don't give a shit if they delete this post...or my account for that matter?"  wyldwolf   Oct-25-07 04:46 PM   #78 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC