You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #49: wiretapping without a warrant is unconstitutional. that is what they did. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. wiretapping without a warrant is unconstitutional. that is what they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Illegal surveillance is a felony. robinlynne  Oct-19-07 02:29 PM   #0 
  - Treason never prospers.  realpolitik   Oct-19-07 02:30 PM   #1 
  - RL would each individual tap constitute a separate count?  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 02:33 PM   #2 
  - (You asked RL but I believe the answer is yes.) n/t  sfexpat2000   Oct-19-07 02:36 PM   #3 
  - So there is mucho liability at stake here  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 02:40 PM   #4 
     - You bet.  sfexpat2000   Oct-19-07 02:41 PM   #5 
     - and our dems are really working hard to pass this shit!  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 03:03 PM   #12 
  - in my opinion, but I'm not a lawyer.  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 03:02 PM   #11 
  - I have questions about this...  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 02:48 PM   #6 
  - I don't believe "color of authority" is applicable  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 03:00 PM   #9 
  - Yes, you may be.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 03:04 PM   #13 
  - why would you give them immunity?  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 03:07 PM   #17 
  - Because of my personal understanding of the situation...  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 03:17 PM   #19 
     - If they are confused about the state of privacy  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 03:23 PM   #20 
     - Its just not that easy.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 03:32 PM   #22 
        - The law is not complicated at all  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 03:40 PM   #26 
           - I am sorry, but you simply don't understand.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 04:02 PM   #27 
              - I agree that intellectual property law sucks.  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 04:11 PM   #29 
                 - Its NEVER a no brainer.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 04:28 PM   #31 
                    - Well if the telcos are that stupid  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 04:51 PM   #35 
                       - Good luck the next time you are in a questionable circumstance.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 05:04 PM   #38 
                          - Thanks  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 05:05 PM   #39 
                             - Which law?  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 05:20 PM   #41 
     - But do you think those trials should be squashed? Or should it go to court,  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 04:32 PM   #33 
        - They should go to court against the PROPER parties.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 05:22 PM   #42 
  - What is the basis for your opinion on the cop/murder scenario?  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 03:10 PM   #18 
     - Its a facts/circumstances thing....  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 03:25 PM   #21 
        - I see problems in this.  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 03:37 PM   #24 
           - You are kidding, right?  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 04:26 PM   #30 
              - Of course not  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 04:48 PM   #34 
                 - No, because what you would PERSONALLY do is of no import  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 04:57 PM   #36 
                    - So if a cop told you to shoot someone you would?  wtmusic   Oct-19-07 04:59 PM   #37 
                       - Possibly. It would depend on facts/circumstances. (nt)  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 05:07 PM   #40 
  - The FIS bill which congress wants to pass says the president's oders to the telcoms  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 03:07 PM   #16 
     - TY for clarifying!!!  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 03:34 PM   #23 
  - If you give the companies immunity, you stop all the legal proceedings.  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 03:06 PM   #14 
     - It doesn't have to...  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 03:37 PM   #25 
        - nice if you want to see the golden lining, but why not just let the trials happen?  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 04:30 PM   #32 
           - Why can't the suits proceed against the proper parties?  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 06:02 PM   #43 
              - the point is, all the suits are about to be quashed. Do you want that?  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 06:29 PM   #44 
                 - If that is the only choice... quash the lawsuits.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 07:00 PM   #45 
                    - we disagree. And the lawsuits are not all about money. The ACLU is doing the suing  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 08:09 PM   #46 
                       - This has NOTHING to do with the constitution.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 08:23 PM   #48 
                          - wiretapping without a warrant is unconstitutional. that is what they did.  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 08:52 PM   #49 
                             - Wrong.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-19-07 11:06 PM   #50 
                                - I don't know if that is true or not, will check with landshark.  robinlynne   Oct-20-07 10:05 AM   #51 
                                   - It's true.  Milo_Bloom   Oct-20-07 12:08 PM   #53 
  - Because he's been a far right enabler since day one  depakid   Oct-19-07 02:49 PM   #7 
  - Had to kick this post as this issue is critical  lyonn   Oct-19-07 02:50 PM   #8 
  - Today it is what he's doing. They (both sides) negotiated a terrible deal  robinlynne   Oct-19-07 03:02 PM   #10 
     - Sheesh, are we missing some grand strategy of  lyonn   Oct-19-07 04:11 PM   #28 
  - Break the law once, it's a crime.  ThomCat   Oct-19-07 03:06 PM   #15 
  - They want to give immunity to Telecom companies, without knowing exactly  PBass   Oct-19-07 08:16 PM   #47 
  - What I hate is that they call it "eavesdropping", like they're a bunch of nosy neighbors  Elspeth   Oct-20-07 10:31 AM   #52 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC