| -Gen. Wesley Clark: Clinton's approach deters a rush to war |
DeepModem Mom |
Oct-14-07 10:46 AM |
#0 |
 -
Shorter Wes Clark: |
geek tragedy |
Oct-14-07 10:48 AM |
#1 |
 -
Yeah, anyone who supports HRC is only trying to get a cabinet post |
skipos |
Oct-14-07 10:51 AM |
#3 |
 -
Does anyone seriously think Clark would be |
geek tragedy |
Oct-14-07 10:53 AM |
#4 |
| -
It's not "selling out" to want a Democrat in the White House |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-14-07 12:49 PM |
#23 |
| -
Hehehehehehe... |
Katzenkavalier |
Oct-14-07 10:55 AM |
#5 |
| -
K&R |
emilyg |
Oct-14-07 02:30 PM |
#76 |
| -
Well, I appreciate his perspective on this, or any national-security subject, and |
calimary |
Oct-14-07 08:13 PM |
#136 |
| -
Nah |
WesDem |
Oct-15-07 08:49 AM |
#205 |
| -
Wes Clark is still the smartest guy in the room. |
MethuenProgressive |
Oct-14-07 10:49 AM |
#2 |
| -
I'd still like to understand this better |
Sparkly |
Oct-14-07 10:58 AM |
#6 |
| -
It increases pressure in a non-military way |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 11:24 AM |
#7 |
| -
The state department has already made that call |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 11:57 AM |
#8 |
| -
So you don't think |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 12:23 PM |
#14 |
| -
Patronize much? |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 01:43 PM |
#58 |
| -
Your position is a total contradiction |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 01:57 PM |
#66 |
| -
Of course I'm not talking about the first version |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 03:20 PM |
#82 |
| -
What bombs? |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 03:31 PM |
#83 |
| -
Nada |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 03:38 PM |
#84 |
| -
Lieberman lost. n/t |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 03:42 PM |
#85 |
| -
Right or wrong, the resolution does NOT negate talk |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-14-07 06:20 PM |
#115 |
| -
Clark supporter told a supporter in LA that he was still "uneasy" about Kyl-Lieberman... |
flpoljunkie |
Oct-14-07 06:33 PM |
#117 |
| -
I believe he supports her decision to vote for both resolutions. |
Sparkly |
Oct-14-07 11:09 PM |
#177 |
| -
My impression |
WesDem |
Oct-16-07 09:53 AM |
#237 |
| -
Did the State Department |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 12:39 PM |
#17 |
| -
Liebermann is dangerous |
The Wizard |
Oct-14-07 03:50 PM |
#86 |
| -
Why is Iran a "problem"? |
eridani |
Oct-14-07 02:17 PM |
#73 |
| -
Thanks Jim...you explained that better than CLARK. I needed that! nt |
Auntie Bush |
Oct-14-07 06:14 PM |
# |
| -
Yes. That is precisely Joe LIeberman's hidden agenda, peace with Iran |
burythehatchet |
Oct-15-07 06:52 AM |
#200 |
| -
It's called pandering. |
jmp |
Oct-14-07 11:59 AM |
#9 |
| -
So what was Obama's excuse with s970 in March 2007? |
Texas_Kat |
Oct-14-07 12:00 PM |
#10 |
| -
No, their excuse for that one is, "he wouldn't have shown up to vote for it anyways" |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:02 PM |
#11 |
| -
and yet that STILL beats the hell out of voting "yes" on it |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:07 PM |
#12 |
| -
No difference |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:26 PM |
#15 |
| -
if you think there is NO DIFFERENCE between a yes vote on this and a nonvote |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:40 PM |
#18 |
| -
Uh huh. And Obama co-writing a bill identical to kyl-lieberman 6 months ago is totally different |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:42 PM |
#19 |
| -
I realize it's tough rationalizing Hillary's vote for war and more war. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:48 PM |
#21 |
| -
Please stop deflecting. I've had just about enough deflecting from you for one day |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:50 PM |
#24 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-14-07 12:53 PM |
#27 |
| -
Once again, no response to my question |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:55 PM |
#31 |
| -
no matter how you frame it |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:58 PM |
#34 |
| -
You should have been a starship captain. SHIELDS UP! DEFLECT! DEFLECT! DEFLECT! |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 01:04 PM |
#39 |
| -
... and Hillary STILL voted "yes" on the IWR and Kyl-Lieberman. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 01:11 PM |
#40 |
| -
You've pointed out the obvious several times |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 05:40 PM |
#94 |
| -
Still can't digest her vote without trying to wipe the shame on others? |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 06:34 PM |
#118 |
| -
No, I'm just wondering if you support your candidate enough |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 07:21 PM |
#127 |
| -
I accept that that bill never made it out of committee. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 07:27 PM |
#129 |
| -
Does that make it ok, though? |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 07:31 PM |
#130 |
| -
comparatively, yes |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 07:36 PM |
#131 |
| -
Umm.. Hillary DID win on this |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 08:12 PM |
#135 |
| -
The war-mongering GOP won on this issue, not America, and certainly not Hillary. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 08:32 PM |
#140 |
| -
Keep praying for that war! |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 08:36 PM |
#142 |
| -
I'll pray that your candidate doesn't continue to take us down that road. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 08:42 PM |
#145 |
| -
Uh huh. I'll bookmark this topic |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 08:48 PM |
#146 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-14-07 09:46 PM |
#152 |
| -
I'm getting The Rush Limbaugh Treatment further down ... they claim that I lie about my military |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 09:51 PM |
#153 |
| -
Holy shit! They pulled the "phony soldier" on you? |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 10:00 PM |
#156 |
| -
Yes, they sure did. However, in their defense ... |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 10:08 PM |
#159 |
| -
I'm hoping the light will go on and people will realize - |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 10:14 PM |
#163 |
| -
another false charge AK? |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 10:34 PM |
#170 |
| -
Well, that would mean I had made one before and I haven't. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 10:58 PM |
#172 |
| -
Nobody did, a question is not to impugn |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 11:05 PM |
#174 |
| -
Hello? Can I get into the conversation? I'm expressing an opinion. If that opinion |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 11:09 PM |
#178 |
| -
Sure |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 11:18 PM |
#183 |
| -
I am suggesting that his authority may have caused you to believe him "infallible" and your behavior |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 11:20 PM |
#184 |
| -
my incessant defense is somewhat balanced by your incessant |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 11:23 PM |
#185 |
| -
Bingo! That's exactly my point. If you REALLY could accept that Clark might harbor HUMAN ulterior |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 11:28 PM |
#186 |
| -
I tell you what |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 11:31 PM |
#188 |
| -
keep telling yourself that |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 11:13 PM |
#180 |
| -
Why should I "tell" myself it, you think I don't believe it? |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 11:28 PM |
#187 |
| -
Well, I can admit in all honesty that this has been a learning experience for me ... I hope also for |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 11:35 PM |
#189 |
| -
You have no intention of learning |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-15-07 02:29 AM |
#191 |
| -
I'm sorry that you were caught up in this AK. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 05:20 AM |
#196 |
| -
Oh I know exactly who she claims to be |
Texas_Kat |
Oct-15-07 03:01 AM |
#193 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-15-07 04:32 AM |
#195 |
| -
what obnoxious hyperbole |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 10:19 PM |
#165 |
| -
Oh, come on, cease with the self-righteous indignation. Clark is only human. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 10:32 PM |
#169 |
| -
Once again, you fall back on I am just awed by Clark. |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 10:52 PM |
#171 |
| -
No, IMO, you can't give up ... come on, admit that Clark is a mere mortal? |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 11:03 PM |
#173 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-14-07 11:06 PM |
#175 |
| -
"You are so full of shit." Nice comeback? What's worse is that you don't even realize |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 11:14 PM |
#181 |
| -
LOL -- you don't "criticize" |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-15-07 01:48 PM |
#208 |
| -
Don't try to deny it... |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 09:58 PM |
#155 |
| -
And the way have chosen to obfiscate it |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 12:45 PM |
#20 |
| -
I'm sorry you don't have a TV. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:49 PM |
#22 |
| -
I do, I had one in 2002 as well |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 12:51 PM |
#25 |
| -
did you miss the drum beat to war? |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:54 PM |
#29 |
| -
I do hear one |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 12:56 PM |
#32 |
| -
the proof is in the pudding |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:59 PM |
#35 |
| -
We are as close to dropping |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 01:02 PM |
#36 |
| -
We cannot afford to hope her "yes" votes as precursors to war turn out okay ... |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 01:03 PM |
#38 |
| -
but what about the precursors to pudding wars? |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 01:14 PM |
#42 |
| -
I'm lactose and war-intolerant. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 01:28 PM |
#45 |
| -
The bill was passed what, a month ago? Where are the republicans using this bill as justification |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:51 PM |
#26 |
| -
some people learned the first time the dog bit them |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 12:55 PM |
#30 |
| -
So they aren't "beating the war drums to Iran" as you said above? |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:57 PM |
#33 |
| -
Jimmy Carter has it exactly right. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 01:02 PM |
#37 |
| -
how does that work? |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-14-07 01:28 PM |
#46 |
| -
So, you want to talk about leadership? |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 01:34 PM |
#51 |
| -
The clear implication of this trip down memory lane |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 01:38 PM |
#56 |
| -
Hillary better stick to other issues because this one isn't hers. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 01:47 PM |
#62 |
| -
but, you are not telling it like it is |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-14-07 01:45 PM |
#60 |
| -
I'm pointing out your faux outrage due to your faulty critical analysis. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 01:51 PM |
#64 |
| -
why don't you answer my questions? All you are doing is being snarky |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-14-07 01:57 PM |
#65 |
| -
No, I'm putting this debate into proper perspective. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 02:05 PM |
#70 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-14-07 02:12 PM |
#72 |
| -
What about s970 again? |
Texas_Kat |
Oct-14-07 02:54 PM |
#78 |
| -
So, Durbin's a "yeah war," senator, too? nt |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 08:34 PM |
#141 |
| -
Durbin voted "no" on the IWR. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 08:39 PM |
#144 |
| -
But you are saying one is an extension of the other |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 10:27 PM |
#168 |
| -
No, that's not what I'm saying at all. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 11:08 PM |
#176 |
| -
"The administration has dipped back into ... IWR....and nobody has |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 11:13 PM |
#179 |
| -
but damn if she didn't pony up those "yeah war" votes to woo the GOP base |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 11:15 PM |
#182 |
| -
But Durbin and others think it will give us more diplomatic leverage. |
calteacherguy |
Oct-15-07 12:09 AM |
#190 |
| -
And the best way to promote diplomacy is to peg the other party a terrorist? |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-15-07 03:31 PM |
#215 |
| -
Two bad bills |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 01:22 PM |
#43 |
| -
Why do you think Durbin and Levin voted for it? Same reason? |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 01:59 PM |
#68 |
| -
Because they are "wooinig the GOP"? |
incapsulated |
Oct-15-07 02:43 PM |
#211 |
| -
Durbin and Levin aren't running for president. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-15-07 03:29 PM |
#214 |
| -
I don't understand it either. Never in history has any national army been |
robinlynne |
Oct-14-07 12:53 PM |
#28 |
| -
Well, technnically, K/L doesn't label the Iranian national army as terrorist |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-14-07 01:12 PM |
#41 |
| -
80 members of the Iranian parliament |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 01:30 PM |
#48 |
| -
The IRG is military unit, not a knitting circle |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-14-07 01:46 PM |
#61 |
| -
The IRG is indeed a military organization |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 02:29 PM |
#75 |
| -
I don't think Kyl-Lieberman goes anywhere near |
seasonedblue |
Oct-14-07 01:36 PM |
#53 |
| -
The Iranian National Army is a different branch |
Donna Zen |
Oct-14-07 03:00 PM |
#79 |
| -
The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment was necessary .. |
Tellurian |
Oct-14-07 01:37 PM |
#55 |
| -
Wesley, Wesley, Wesley. I am just so damn disappointed in you. I really |
acmavm |
Oct-14-07 12:09 PM |
#13 |
| -
Why? Because he doesn't conform to your preconcieved notion? |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 12:34 PM |
#16 |
| -
The problem is: Bush can't read |
high density |
Oct-14-07 01:33 PM |
#50 |
| -
When can we expect that to happen? |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-14-07 05:44 PM |
#95 |
| -
I thought he was more honest and upright than to support corporatist |
acmavm |
Oct-14-07 09:52 PM |
#154 |
| -
I feel the same way |
high density |
Oct-14-07 01:31 PM |
#49 |
| -
Hillary or Obama, either way Clark may be a good Sec. of defense...? |
Imagevision |
Oct-14-07 01:23 PM |
#44 |
| -
I trust Clark |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-14-07 01:30 PM |
#47 |
| -
Maybe you should |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 01:35 PM |
#52 |
| -
He has been exactly right regarding the Iraq debacle. He is a strong, intelligent |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-14-07 01:43 PM |
#57 |
| -
Oops, you misunderstood me, or I was very unclear |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 01:45 PM |
#59 |
| -
sorry--fixed it. |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-14-07 01:47 PM |
#63 |
| -
Trust him to what? Say what's politically popular around here? |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 02:01 PM |
#69 |
| -
I trust him to tell us what he truly believes |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-14-07 02:07 PM |
#71 |
| -
You are fucking wrong, way wrong General...Oh man, what a disappoitment...nt |
Nimrod2005 |
Oct-14-07 01:37 PM |
#54 |
| -
Excellent article. Thanks for posting! nt |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 01:57 PM |
#67 |
| -
Whenever I begin a diplomatic endeavor, I like to start by calling |
rucky |
Oct-14-07 02:24 PM |
#74 |
| -
The IRG is not Iran, and Iran is not the IRG. |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 05:54 PM |
#99 |
| -
We called the military of Iran terrorists. |
killbotfactory |
Oct-14-07 02:31 PM |
#77 |
| -
It's not...it's just about |
zidzi |
Oct-14-07 07:06 PM |
#123 |
| -
It's General (RETIRED) Wesley Clark. He's just another civilian now. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 03:01 PM |
#80 |
| -
Its ShortnFiery |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 03:15 PM |
#81 |
| -
Oh, I do show respect to those who earn it - Clark doesn't qualify. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 05:23 PM |
#88 |
| -
If your charge had any merit |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 05:27 PM |
#89 |
| -
Yes, you still have *stars* in your eyes. Perhaps a career in the military |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 05:29 PM |
#90 |
| -
Another charge that amounts to zip. n/t |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 05:32 PM |
#91 |
| -
In your opinion. IMO, Generals and Retired Generals are not God Almighty. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 05:35 PM |
#92 |
| -
No its your opinion, as you don't know me, or anything about Clark |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 05:45 PM |
#96 |
| -
In your opinion. Gee, we can do this all night. You must really adore him? |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 05:46 PM |
#98 |
| -
Are you old enough |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 05:55 PM |
#100 |
| -
Yes, I do believe that I am. If you want the full meshing of military & politics, General Musarraf |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 06:00 PM |
#104 |
| -
Your statement is absurd & posting that photo of General Musarraf is your propaganda |
FrenchieCat |
Oct-15-07 02:30 PM |
#210 |
| -
No, I still think Clark would not be "a bad" running mate, but he is still a political beastie. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 03:37 PM |
#217 |
| -
Ahhhhh |
WesDem |
Oct-15-07 03:51 PM |
#220 |
| -
So true, we are not permitted to re-evaluate the motives of Clark, even with the inane prose above. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 03:55 PM |
#223 |
| -
Great post! |
seasonedblue |
Oct-15-07 03:55 PM |
#222 |
| -
I never denied that he would still be an "ok" VP. Or do you defend his inane arguement above? n/t |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 03:58 PM |
#225 |
| -
You're smearing a respected general who has |
seasonedblue |
Oct-15-07 04:12 PM |
#227 |
| -
Oh stop wrapping Clark in the flag and spewing jingoistic nonsense. His prose above STINKS! |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 04:17 PM |
#228 |
| -
I'll defend Clark's record from your baseless smears |
seasonedblue |
Oct-15-07 04:29 PM |
#231 |
| -
It's not SMEARS, but merely a person's opinion who does not want us to continue to |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 04:39 PM |
#232 |
| -
I have to admit that those of you who continue to refer to him as General instead of Retired General |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 04:29 PM |
#230 |
| -
I'll admit that, for a time, you got me sold on him - but I've delved deeper. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 04:03 PM |
#226 |
| -
You know.... |
CarolNYC |
Oct-14-07 06:04 PM |
#106 |
| -
I was open to him for a very short time. But now, I believe my original "take" stands true. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 06:10 PM |
#109 |
| -
Well...you know very little about a lot of things apparently... |
CarolNYC |
Oct-14-07 06:14 PM |
#111 |
| -
Back at ya! |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 06:16 PM |
#112 |
| -
Why.... you sound like a certain RW entertainer.... |
Texas_Kat |
Oct-14-07 05:39 PM |
#93 |
| -
Oh gee, anybody who doesn't genuflect for "the good general" is a right winger. Got it. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 05:45 PM |
#97 |
| -
Well, he's proven his worth.... still waiting from some indication |
Texas_Kat |
Oct-14-07 05:58 PM |
#102 |
| -
Please, what great humanitarian action is Clark know for? He's bright, attractive & a former General |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 06:03 PM |
#105 |
| -
Oh, please |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 06:06 PM |
#107 |
| -
Oh yeah. I'm sorry that our opinions don't mesh, but it's not martial law ... |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 06:07 PM |
#108 |
| -
Yeah, because I called for your imprisonment |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 06:49 PM |
#120 |
| -
Oh, I believe SOME people would have others imprisoned if they could have the power. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 06:59 PM |
#122 |
| -
Ask Sadako Ogata and Samantha Power |
Texas_Kat |
Oct-14-07 09:34 PM |
#150 |
| -
Gee, and if we would have LISTENED to General (Ret.) Zinni instead of the whorish M$M and HRC |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 09:41 PM |
#151 |
| -
I guess you don't know much about either the rank or the people |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-14-07 06:10 PM |
#110 |
| -
What? I'm not going to show you my DD 214 but I served four years AD in the 1980s. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 06:28 PM |
#116 |
| -
he sounds like Rush Limbaugh calling you a phoney soldier. |
jonnyblitz |
Oct-14-07 07:10 PM |
#126 |
| -
Thanks JB. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 07:24 PM |
#128 |
| -
Wrong on both counts |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-14-07 07:53 PM |
#132 |
| -
Hey, I'm "a she" too, former Regular Army, LT. In fact there hasn't been a day in my life |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 08:15 PM |
#138 |
| -
Who exactly the fuck do you think you are? |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-15-07 01:40 PM |
#207 |
| -
Oh yeah, that's right? Regular Army Officers can ID with their rank - BFD. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 03:21 PM |
#212 |
| -
You still don't get it |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-16-07 06:22 PM |
#238 |
| -
So what? |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-14-07 08:03 PM |
#133 |
| -
No, Zinni was an excellent M.E. envoy who resigned rather than support this insane invasion. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 08:09 PM |
#134 |
| -
You obviously have an agenda against Clark, talk about political animal |
Jim4Wes |
Oct-14-07 09:13 PM |
#148 |
| -
"Obviously" you think so. That's fine - Clark is a politico. IMO, he's spinning like a top for HRC. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 09:17 PM |
#149 |
| -
Other than edorsing her |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 10:09 PM |
#160 |
| -
Now you are insulting my intelligence. "Endorsing HRC" pretty much sums it up. n/t |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 10:11 PM |
#162 |
| -
Then why bother arguing this? |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 10:18 PM |
#164 |
| -
No, "worthless" is hyperbole. However, now that he's fully endorsing HRC, you can't fault those |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-14-07 10:27 PM |
#167 |
| -
I don't fault that suspicion ShortnFiery |
Tom Rinaldo |
Oct-15-07 02:44 AM |
#192 |
| -
I don't fault the suspicious Tom Rinaldo either. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 04:22 AM |
#194 |
| -
The sum total of your words on this thread far outstrips mine |
Tom Rinaldo |
Oct-15-07 06:06 AM |
#197 |
| -
Too funny in a sad way. I would not have had to defend myself or my military service if "Clarkies" |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 06:24 AM |
#198 |
| -
My reply to you was respectful and thoughtful |
Tom Rinaldo |
Oct-15-07 06:37 AM |
#199 |
| -
With respect, I considered your reply as calculated "smoke screen" to confuse the issues. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 07:28 AM |
#202 |
| -
Who you choose to trust and why is your business |
Tom Rinaldo |
Oct-15-07 08:10 AM |
#203 |
| -
Then it's a deal. :-) I hope you enjoy your trip. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 08:14 AM |
#204 |
| -
"Not unlike Caesar" |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-15-07 02:06 PM |
#209 |
| -
You need to let go of all that anger and hatred. Yes, Kyle-Lieberman is poison. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 03:29 PM |
#213 |
| -
WTF? |
Jai4WKC08 |
Oct-16-07 06:34 PM |
#239 |
| -
"They are ALL honorable men." Was that lost on you? n/t |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-15-07 03:56 PM |
#224 |
| -
I'm pretty sure they get to keep their title, even in retirement |
LittleClarkie |
Oct-15-07 09:48 PM |
#236 |
| -
I think the point here is that Hillary felt she had to bring out the "big guns" to defend this vote. |
flpoljunkie |
Oct-14-07 05:14 PM |
#87 |
| -
For Obama, there is no defense. |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 05:56 PM |
#101 |
| -
Apparently you missed or are purposely ignoring this post from the other day... |
flpoljunkie |
Oct-14-07 06:17 PM |
#113 |
| -
Link to the public announcement at time of vote, please. nt |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 07:09 PM |
#124 |
| -
But Biden said that's incorrect, or incomplete, |
seasonedblue |
Oct-15-07 03:36 PM |
#216 |
| -
... or maybe what Biden says is incorrect or incomplete. |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-15-07 03:50 PM |
#219 |
| -
Maybe Biden is incorrect, |
seasonedblue |
Oct-15-07 04:21 PM |
#229 |
| -
you are trying to defuse his right speak |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-15-07 05:23 PM |
#233 |
| -
Obama is entitled to speak, |
seasonedblue |
Oct-15-07 06:57 PM |
#235 |
| -
Exactly |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 05:58 PM |
#103 |
| -
it speaks volumes |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 06:37 PM |
#119 |
| -
He proposed the IWR |
sandnsea |
Oct-14-07 06:17 PM |
#114 |
| -
He did no such thing |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 06:56 PM |
#121 |
| -
What? LOL! nt |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 07:10 PM |
#125 |
| -
No he did not. |
seasonedblue |
Oct-14-07 08:49 PM |
#147 |
| -
more Koolaid, Wesley? |
illinoisprogressive |
Oct-14-07 08:15 PM |
#137 |
| -
Explain Durbin's vote to me. nt |
calteacherguy |
Oct-14-07 08:16 PM |
#139 |
| -
Well she won't say that Durbin drank the kool aid |
seasonedblue |
Oct-14-07 08:37 PM |
#143 |
| -
Trying to use Durbin for cover for the fact that Hillary is gop neocon won't work |
illinoisprogressive |
Oct-14-07 10:01 PM |
#157 |
| -
Trying to ignore Durbin |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 10:06 PM |
#158 |
| -
hey |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-14-07 10:09 PM |
#161 |
| -
Sadly, I believe it without reading it, lol |
incapsulated |
Oct-14-07 10:20 PM |
#166 |
| -
Today, I un-subscribe to WesPac |
burythehatchet |
Oct-15-07 06:53 AM |
#201 |
| -
Thank you General...nt |
SaveElmer |
Oct-15-07 08:52 AM |
#206 |
| -
I thought votevets.org was against the Liberman/Kyl bill... |
jenmito |
Oct-15-07 03:39 PM |
#218 |
| -
of course it doesn't help with diplomatic efforts |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-15-07 03:54 PM |
#221 |
| -
That's for sure... |
jenmito |
Oct-15-07 05:34 PM |
#234 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore