You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Who knows. Maybe she meant "meat them" by serving them McDonalds hamburgers [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ginchinchili Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Who knows. Maybe she meant "meat them" by serving them McDonalds hamburgers
That is if McDonalds promises to make a big corporate donation to her war chest. Shouldn't she be in the Guiness Book of World Records for being beholden to the greatest number of donating corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Grrr Clinton just pisses me off Egnever  Oct-12-07 10:42 PM   #0 
  - Weathervane  yourout   Oct-12-07 10:43 PM   #1 
  - At least she really wants the job.  liberalmuse   Oct-12-07 10:45 PM   #2 
  - LOL well you got me there !  Egnever   Oct-12-07 10:49 PM   #6 
     - All of them will  niceypoo   Oct-13-07 02:02 AM   #78 
  - Meet Them  dardango   Oct-12-07 10:46 PM   #3 
  - Who knows. Maybe she meant "meat them" by serving them McDonalds hamburgers  ginchinchili   Oct-12-07 10:53 PM   #13 
  - No, Obama was naive because he said he would invite the leaders to the white house  Lirwin2   Oct-12-07 10:47 PM   #4 
  - He never said anything like that  Egnever   Oct-12-07 10:50 PM   #7 
  - Yes he did, during the debate  Lirwin2   Oct-12-07 10:59 PM   #19 
     - No he didnt!  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:08 PM   #26 
        - Without precondition "In washington or anywhere else"  Lirwin2   Oct-13-07 12:17 PM   #101 
  - Exactly. People seem to miss the point. She never said she was against negotiating with them  journalist3072   Oct-12-07 10:50 PM   #8 
  - So how does that square?  Egnever   Oct-12-07 10:53 PM   #12 
  - You need to be a lawyer to really understand Clintonian BS. I don't want her as president. (nt)  w4rma   Oct-13-07 01:27 AM   #76 
  - Thank you. Facts are a DUer's best friend.(eom)  oasis   Oct-12-07 10:52 PM   #11 
  - Not one fact in that post  Egnever   Oct-12-07 10:57 PM   #17 
  - OH MY!!! MEET THEM IN THE W.H.??? How awful .  DB1   Oct-12-07 11:04 PM   #22 
  - Obama said he'd be willing to speak w/o preconditions; he did not promise to speak with them, as Hil  flpoljunkie   Oct-13-07 07:11 AM   #89 
     - He promised to speak with them "In washington or anywhere else"  Lirwin2   Oct-13-07 12:20 PM   #102 
  - You po'd yourself ... read again. She never changed her mind  Fredda Weinberg   Oct-12-07 10:47 PM   #5 
  - What???  Egnever   Oct-12-07 10:51 PM   #9 
     - So let me ask you this...  SaveElmer   Oct-12-07 10:57 PM   #16 
     - I would engage in negotiations with Iran, with no conditions  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:03 PM   #21 
     - The characterization of Obamas statement is exactly correct...  SaveElmer   Oct-12-07 11:20 PM   #32 
        - No it was pure spin  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:23 PM   #33 
           - Gawd...this is like hitting my head on a brick wall...  SaveElmer   Oct-12-07 11:34 PM   #37 
              - I hope it hurts  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:46 PM   #42 
                 - Fine...  SaveElmer   Oct-13-07 12:28 AM   #52 
                    - LOL am I the pot or the kettle?  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:36 AM   #58 
                       - Obama has the same problem...  Tellurian   Oct-13-07 05:12 AM   #83 
     - Ah...but the next day...  zulchzulu   Oct-12-07 11:06 PM   #25 
        - You keep trying...  SaveElmer   Oct-12-07 11:25 PM   #34 
     - By "I" she means her administration, Obama said he would PERSONALLY meet with them, unconditionally  Lirwin2   Oct-12-07 11:02 PM   #20 
     - ROFL now thats funny  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:11 PM   #27 
     - rofl  Usrename   Oct-13-07 06:10 AM   #86 
     - Negotiations are not meetings between heads of state  Fredda Weinberg   Oct-13-07 01:32 PM   #106 
  - Debunked...the netroots is like Whack-a-Mole...  SaveElmer   Oct-12-07 10:51 PM   #10 
  - Please point me to it  Egnever   Oct-12-07 10:54 PM   #14 
  - No one can expect sound or honest government from Hillary.  illinoisprogressive   Oct-12-07 10:54 PM   #15 
  - Sure we can...and we will get it...nt  SaveElmer   Oct-12-07 10:58 PM   #18 
  - More war is what you can expect from her!  superkia   Oct-13-07 02:16 AM   #79 
  - It is amazing how quickly people jump to the wrong conclusions  Evergreen Emerald   Oct-12-07 11:05 PM   #23 
  - Yes it is.  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:12 PM   #28 
  - Yep  seasonedblue   Oct-12-07 11:13 PM   #29 
  - LOL  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:18 PM   #31 
  - Yes. Make them up.  emilyg   Oct-13-07 12:03 AM   #49 
  - I'll give you one example.  seasonedblue   Oct-13-07 12:36 AM   #55 
     - Sorry I dont have a clue what you are talking about  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:38 AM   #59 
        - Here's the first one I found:  seasonedblue   Oct-13-07 12:52 AM   #68 
           - Well to be honest after reading that thread  Egnever   Oct-13-07 01:12 AM   #74 
              - I wasn't talking about the OP  seasonedblue   Oct-13-07 01:21 AM   #75 
                 - Sorry I just cant comment on it  Egnever   Oct-13-07 01:40 AM   #77 
                    - So you're equally outraged with Obama  seasonedblue   Oct-13-07 09:52 AM   #100 
                       - I am not outraged about either of them  Egnever   Oct-13-07 01:45 PM   #107 
  - I've noticed  gaspee   Oct-13-07 04:53 AM   #82 
  - That's funny. Her campaign attacked Obama for being willing to talk to an "anti-semite"  killbotfactory   Oct-13-07 12:01 AM   #48 
  - She is not saying the same thing as Obama.  calteacherguy   Oct-12-07 11:05 PM   #24 
  - She is saying she would negotiate without any preconditions  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:17 PM   #30 
  - He said he would go personally.  calteacherguy   Oct-12-07 11:26 PM   #35 
     - Heres a quote of the transcript  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:34 PM   #38 
        - Read Hillary's response. nt  calteacherguy   Oct-12-07 11:41 PM   #41 
           - I did and she had all kinds of preconditions then  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:48 PM   #44 
              - Please provide a link to the "all kinds." nt  calteacherguy   Oct-13-07 12:13 AM   #51 
              - From the transcript  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:29 AM   #53 
                 - Oh, but don't you see?  killbotfactory   Oct-13-07 12:36 AM   #56 
                 - It is totally different.  calteacherguy   Oct-13-07 12:54 AM   #69 
                    - Yeah, she's too chicken shit to personally meet with our adversaries  killbotfactory   Oct-13-07 01:00 AM   #70 
                       - That's not even worthy of a response. nt  calteacherguy   Oct-13-07 01:02 AM   #71 
                          - Then why did she rule out meeting with our adversaries?  killbotfactory   Oct-13-07 01:06 AM   #73 
                 - There is absolutely no contradiction, then!  calteacherguy   Oct-13-07 12:39 AM   #61 
                    - Head in the sand comes to mind  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:45 AM   #63 
                       - I don't understand the point you are trying to make, if you have one. nt  calteacherguy   Oct-13-07 12:46 AM   #65 
                          - That doesn't surprise me  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:48 AM   #66 
                             - Simply be snarky towards one another really isn't going to lead anywhere.  calteacherguy   Oct-13-07 12:49 AM   #67 
                                - I would agree with you there  Egnever   Oct-13-07 01:05 AM   #72 
              - Or you havn't got a clue in the world what you are talking about...  SaveElmer   Oct-13-07 12:30 AM   #54 
                 - Or you just rah rah for hillary no matter what she says!  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:39 AM   #60 
  - As if Obama wouldn't have low level diplomatic discussions  killbotfactory   Oct-12-07 11:59 PM   #47 
  - Yes, politicians are whores. That is a reality. What matters is--Will that politician make  valerief   Oct-12-07 11:33 PM   #36 
  - And therein lies the problem  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:39 PM   #40 
     - What are our choices? Can you control the men with guns that Bush controls?  valerief   Oct-12-07 11:47 PM   #43 
        - Maybe thats what makes me so mad  Egnever   Oct-12-07 11:53 PM   #45 
           - We're totally at the mercy of the men with the anthrax. And we want  valerief   Oct-12-07 11:58 PM   #46 
  - Damn! We know she sways with the wind. Either sway with it or don't. nt  babylonsister   Oct-12-07 11:39 PM   #39 
  - She needs to be careful - the two sound bites together  karynnj   Oct-13-07 12:05 AM   #50 
  - Good post on Huff - maybe will clear it up for you.  emilyg   Oct-13-07 12:36 AM   #57 
  - no link?  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:40 AM   #62 
     - Couldnt find it  Egnever   Oct-13-07 12:45 AM   #64 
  - This is how it's played in the big leagues  2rth2pwr   Oct-13-07 02:47 AM   #80 
  - I agree...  Tellurian   Oct-13-07 06:19 AM   #87 
  - Well as long as the media whores like Timmy Russert and Howie Kurtz KISS HER ASS,  ShortnFiery   Oct-13-07 03:44 AM   #81 
  - The anti-Hillarites are inexorably converting me to Hillary. Keep it up, guys.  Perry Logan   Oct-13-07 05:34 AM   #84 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-13-07 05:44 AM   #85 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-13-07 09:00 AM   #94 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-13-07 06:25 AM   #88 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-13-07 09:01 AM   #95 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-13-07 09:16 AM   #98 
  - With me she disappoints, not angers.  Forkboy   Oct-13-07 07:15 AM   #90 
  - Fulla Crap, as usual...  Tellurian   Oct-13-07 09:02 AM   #96 
     - Don't be so hard on yourself.  Forkboy   Oct-13-07 09:15 AM   #97 
  - It's a woman's prerogative to change her mind ...  jmp   Oct-13-07 07:21 AM   #91 
  - Did you drag that gem  seasonedblue   Oct-13-07 12:21 PM   #104 
  - She just keeps twirling, twirling, twirling toward victory!  MLFerrell   Oct-13-07 08:23 AM   #92 
  - But her latest poll had her @ 950% of the vote .....  Botany   Oct-13-07 08:30 AM   #93 
  - Gawd, I'm so glad I missed THAT poll.  babylonsister   Oct-13-07 09:46 AM   #99 
  - She's got the important part of all that figured out...  ginchinchili   Oct-13-07 12:20 PM   #103 
  - It is understandable to be pissed off at her, but why pick a facially false story as a catalyst?  Kurt_and_Hunter   Oct-13-07 12:32 PM   #105 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC