wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-10-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message |
| 33. 32 replies and not single shred of evidence... |
| -Can anyone provide evidence showing Hillary will drive up GOP turnout? |
rinsd |
Oct-09-07 10:39 PM |
#0 |
 -
The only thing that would drive GOP turnout |
Xipe Totec |
Oct-09-07 10:42 PM |
#1 |
 -
LOL |
rinsd |
Oct-09-07 10:42 PM |
#2 |
| -
Sounds like Fred Thompson didn't do it for ya. nt |
babylonsister |
Oct-09-07 10:46 PM |
#6 |
 -
I know some GOP women who would vote for Hillary. |
SharonAnn |
Oct-09-07 10:54 PM |
#11 |
| -
I know 6 white male republicans who are voting for her in the General Election. |
avrdream |
Oct-10-07 05:11 AM |
#29 |
| -
No. |
liberalmuse |
Oct-09-07 10:45 PM |
#3 |
| -
Common Sense! |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-09-07 10:45 PM |
#4 |
| -
i can make up fake polls from non existent think tanks and political web sites though. |
chimpsrsmarter |
Oct-09-07 10:46 PM |
#5 |
| -
I know, I hear it all the time too, but only from the talking heads! |
napi21 |
Oct-09-07 10:47 PM |
#7 |
| -
Maybe that she isn't leading among the candidates who could win in the GE among |
saracat |
Oct-09-07 10:49 PM |
#8 |
| -
Not a bad argument in terms of her GE viability |
rinsd |
Oct-09-07 10:53 PM |
#10 |
| -
Probably not but I do not know what one would measure the GOP dislike with. |
saracat |
Oct-09-07 10:58 PM |
#12 |
| -
I am not denying the hatred at all. |
rinsd |
Oct-09-07 11:02 PM |
#17 |
| -
I didn't think you were.I have always respected you rinsd. |
saracat |
Oct-09-07 11:06 PM |
#20 |
| -
wait. She does lead the top GOPers in GE match ups |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 04:52 AM |
#27 |
| -
"Conventional wisdom" unsupported by fact....Like Iraq having wmd's |
Rowdyboy |
Oct-09-07 10:53 PM |
#9 |
| -
It's not scientific, but I live among the right wing ... the hard core ones. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-09-07 11:00 PM |
#15 |
| -
Oh, I know what you're tlaking about.... |
Rowdyboy |
Oct-09-07 11:02 PM |
#18 |
| -
Oh yes, and with regard to most other topics, these folks are quite accommodating. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-09-07 11:13 PM |
#21 |
| -
Hating Clintons |
lamprey |
Oct-10-07 08:54 AM |
#32 |
| -
ABC |
syberyenta |
Oct-09-07 10:58 PM |
#13 |
| -
Well thank you for your "evidence" |
rinsd |
Oct-09-07 10:59 PM |
#14 |
| -
I see it all the time |
Froward69 |
Oct-09-07 11:01 PM |
#16 |
| -
I think you meant to post this in GD:Empiricism. This is GD:ReceivedWisdom |
Kurt_and_Hunter |
Oct-09-07 11:04 PM |
#19 |
| -
you have not read all the posts saying so. |
illinoisprogressive |
Oct-09-07 11:21 PM |
#22 |
| -
oooh, now there's some evidence. Posts on DU say so. |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 08:57 AM |
#35 |
| -
Nothing beyond those high negatives, low head-to-head numbers, and every third defamation from |
Stop Cornyn |
Oct-09-07 11:24 PM |
#23 |
| -
" low head-to-head numbers" |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Oct-10-07 04:12 AM |
#26 |
| -
Here are some of Hillary's low head-to-head numbers I was referring to: |
Stop Cornyn |
Oct-10-07 02:04 PM |
#59 |
| -
I can't, but there's a lot of anecdotal trouble from many directions and something potentially worse |
PurityOfEssence |
Oct-09-07 11:34 PM |
#24 |
| -
there's a lot of anecdotes that say the opposite |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 08:58 AM |
#36 |
| -
Okay, but can you "prove" them with stats either? |
PurityOfEssence |
Oct-10-07 09:51 AM |
#38 |
| -
no, which is why I never use anecdotes unless responding to anecdotes |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 10:32 AM |
#40 |
| -
They will take one look at their candidate |
libodem |
Oct-10-07 12:08 AM |
#25 |
| -
People who think that a Hillary nom will substantially drive |
cali |
Oct-10-07 05:04 AM |
#28 |
| -
My FIL (repub) is going to caucus as a democrat to vote against her. EOM |
lojasmo |
Oct-10-07 06:29 AM |
#30 |
| -
Good question, rinsd |
WesDem |
Oct-10-07 08:37 AM |
#31 |
| -
Damn I see you got off the fence and it wasn't to join us. |
rinsd |
Oct-10-07 01:22 PM |
#52 |
| -
Yeah, it was a tough one |
WesDem |
Oct-10-07 01:29 PM |
#55 |
| -
32 replies and not single shred of evidence... |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 08:55 AM |
#33 |
| -
post evidence that the sun will rise tomorrow n/t |
LSK |
Oct-10-07 11:32 AM |
#43 |
| -
Is that in question? |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 11:36 AM |
#44 |
| -
is the the OP in question? |
LSK |
Oct-10-07 11:43 AM |
#45 |
| -
of course it is. Which is why the OP exists. |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 11:49 AM |
#46 |
| -
so I guess all the Repukes I know who bash Hillary all the time are imaginary? |
LSK |
Oct-10-07 11:58 AM |
#47 |
| -
no more so than the Repukes I know who bash Obama and Edwards |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 12:06 PM |
#48 |
| -
you know Repukes who know Obama and Edwards??? |
LSK |
Oct-10-07 12:11 PM |
#49 |
| -
did I say that? |
wyldwolf |
Oct-10-07 12:25 PM |
#51 |
| -
that is what they said about her during the senate race--turned out to be a lie |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-10-07 08:55 AM |
#34 |
| -
Personal experience, listening to republicans, the 2000-2004 elections, and common sense |
Dawgs |
Oct-10-07 09:29 AM |
#37 |
| -
Hate doesn't equal turnout. |
rinsd |
Oct-10-07 01:27 PM |
#54 |
| -
Use of Her Name to Drive Fundraising & Numerous High Negative Polls With Little Fluidity |
DrFunkenstein |
Oct-10-07 10:25 AM |
#39 |
| -
Actually that is a great test. The RNC recently used her name in a email. |
rinsd |
Oct-10-07 01:24 PM |
#53 |
| -
"proof", " evidence", is not compatible with rabid Hillary hatred on DU. nt. |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-10-07 11:30 AM |
#41 |
| -
do you know any Republicans???? were you alive in the 90s?? |
LSK |
Oct-10-07 11:31 AM |
#42 |
| -
Because there is no evidence to support it. |
rinsd |
Oct-10-07 01:35 PM |
#57 |
| -
No empiric evidence, but one would have to have been in a coma - |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-10-07 12:14 PM |
#50 |
| -
Actually AK that presents the chance for an experiment. |
rinsd |
Oct-10-07 01:38 PM |
#58 |
| -
that may be the GOP's only real leverage for fund-raising |
AtomicKitten |
Oct-10-07 02:05 PM |
#60 |
| -
Irrelevant |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Oct-10-07 01:30 PM |
#56 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread