dpbrown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-17-03 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 23. DK can beat Bush more soundly than they will be able to |
|
Because he won't be clawing and fighting to try and convince former Bush voters - he can win with the 2000 Democratic vote and the Green vote combined.
|
| -The MOST Democratic candidate will beat Bush MOST decisively |
dpbrown |
Dec-17-03 03:01 PM |
#0 |
 -
Wow. |
SeveneightyWhoa |
Dec-17-03 03:04 PM |
#1 |
  -
Please propose an alternative view of the 40/40/20 rule |
dpbrown |
Dec-17-03 04:25 PM |
#22 |
| -
You think Kucinich will beat Bush most handily. |
SeveneightyWhoa |
Dec-17-03 04:43 PM |
#27 |
| -
I applied an acknowledged election measurement logically |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 11:43 AM |
#30 |
| -
Could this have anything to do with the falling |
redqueen |
Dec-18-03 12:10 PM |
#32 |
| -
Exactly - even if the DLC "won" with Clinton they lost us Congress |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 01:17 PM |
#34 |
| -
If Dean or Kerry can beat Bush, DK can beat Bush |
WhoCountsTheVotes |
Dec-17-03 03:05 PM |
#2 |
| -
DK can beat Bush more soundly than they will be able to |
dpbrown |
Dec-17-03 04:26 PM |
#23 |
| -
Thanks but now I'm having a ...... |
deminflorida |
Dec-17-03 03:07 PM |
#3 |
| -
Your alternative reality is of your own creation, not mine |
dpbrown |
Dec-17-03 04:31 PM |
#24 |
| -
here, here! |
spychoactive |
Dec-17-03 03:11 PM |
#4 |
| -
Here's one problem though |
felonious thunk |
Dec-17-03 03:14 PM |
#5 |
| -
not sure if i agree |
spychoactive |
Dec-17-03 03:25 PM |
#9 |
| -
Not necessarily though |
felonious thunk |
Dec-17-03 03:28 PM |
#11 |
| -
Here's a thought... |
PHDiva |
Dec-17-03 03:42 PM |
#13 |
| -
Hey, I don't disagree with you on the fear factor |
felonious thunk |
Dec-17-03 03:46 PM |
#15 |
| -
good point |
spychoactive |
Dec-17-03 03:52 PM |
#18 |
| -
That's not the way the rule works |
dpbrown |
Dec-17-03 04:38 PM |
#25 |
| -
The "Centrist" wing is an imaginary creation |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 01:26 PM |
#36 |
| -
DK |
YNGW |
Dec-17-03 03:20 PM |
#6 |
| -
Actually, that's not true |
dpbrown |
Dec-17-03 04:43 PM |
#26 |
| -
Actually, it is true |
YNGW |
Dec-18-03 12:19 PM |
#33 |
| -
He'd make the strongest candidate |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 01:22 PM |
#35 |
| -
Reply |
YNGW |
Dec-18-03 02:19 PM |
#38 |
| -
The numbers don't necessarily support your theory |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 03:00 PM |
#39 |
| -
I've said this before... |
YNGW |
Dec-18-03 03:16 PM |
#41 |
| -
More people total voted progressive than conservative in 2000 |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 03:38 PM |
#45 |
| -
No |
YNGW |
Dec-18-03 03:40 PM |
#46 |
| -
Nader won't run if Kucinich gets the nod, and he'll get the Dem core |
dpbrown |
Dec-19-03 09:55 AM |
#54 |
| -
problem with warrant |
Iverson |
Dec-19-03 10:03 AM |
#57 |
| -
No, it's not "mythology" and I do think it's true and a tie is a loss |
dpbrown |
Dec-20-03 08:58 AM |
#58 |
| -
I think you've misunderstood me. |
Iverson |
Dec-20-03 09:03 AM |
#59 |
| -
Ah, my cryptic sensor failed me there |
dpbrown |
Dec-20-03 10:00 AM |
#60 |
| -
DK: Tick-tock |
Jack_Dawson |
Dec-17-03 03:21 PM |
#7 |
| -
Did Ted Koppel actually say that? |
A-Schwarzenegger |
Dec-17-03 03:55 PM |
#19 |
| -
in all due respect |
CMT |
Dec-17-03 03:59 PM |
#21 |
| -
Koppel asked 19 process questions before 1 substance Q |
dpbrown |
Dec-17-03 04:44 PM |
#28 |
| -
In a way |
PATRICK |
Dec-17-03 03:24 PM |
#8 |
| -
that was very eloquent |
spychoactive |
Dec-17-03 03:27 PM |
#10 |
| -
Has anyone else noticed... |
PHDiva |
Dec-17-03 03:33 PM |
#12 |
| -
If Dennis wins the nomination he will get my vote |
Bandit |
Dec-17-03 03:46 PM |
#14 |
| -
Kucinich is far too liberal |
leyton |
Dec-17-03 03:51 PM |
#16 |
| -
it's thinking like this: |
spychoactive |
Dec-17-03 03:57 PM |
#20 |
| -
History: |
LWolf |
Dec-20-03 11:05 AM |
#61 |
| -
I agree that it is difficult to predict |
T Wolf |
Dec-17-03 03:51 PM |
#17 |
| -
Every time the Democratic Party runs left in a Presidential election, |
library_max |
Dec-17-03 05:18 PM |
#29 |
| -
The 40/40/20 rule is not "made up" and centrists lose |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 11:53 AM |
#31 |
| -
You can't support a single assertion you've made here. |
library_max |
Dec-18-03 02:13 PM |
#37 |
| -
53 million Gore/Nader to 50 million Bush in 2000 |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 03:13 PM |
#40 |
| -
You can't just take Gore and Nader votes in 2000 and hand them to Kucinich |
library_max |
Dec-18-03 03:25 PM |
#42 |
| -
Very True |
YNGW |
Dec-18-03 03:29 PM |
#43 |
| -
Very untrue, Nader won't run if Kucinich does, LaDuke endorsed DK |
dpbrown |
Dec-19-03 10:01 AM |
#56 |
| -
40% will vote core Democratic, only Kucinich has Green endorsements |
dpbrown |
Dec-18-03 03:36 PM |
#44 |
| -
No matter how many times you repeat it, it remains speculative fiction. |
library_max |
Dec-18-03 03:45 PM |
#47 |
| -
Perhaps "trend" would be better than "rule" |
Nadienne |
Dec-18-03 04:12 PM |
#49 |
| -
More on speculation... |
Nadienne |
Dec-18-03 04:23 PM |
#50 |
| -
Then you'll agree that whoever ends up winning the Democratic primaries |
library_max |
Dec-18-03 04:55 PM |
#51 |
| -
I can't agree with that |
redqueen |
Dec-18-03 05:02 PM |
#52 |
| -
Okay. Let's take that bit of conspiracy theory as gospel. |
library_max |
Dec-18-03 05:08 PM |
#53 |
| -
No matter how many times you rant, it's just pedantic nonsense |
dpbrown |
Dec-19-03 09:59 AM |
#55 |
| -
I agree with your premise--it is definately time for us to get a true |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Dec-18-03 03:47 PM |
#48 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread