gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-25-07 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 11. What is their explanation, then, of why they ARE supporting her? nt |
| - Why aren't Hillary supporters bothered by her support of outsourcing? Why are they not bothered by |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:14 AM |
#0 |
 -
I haven't picked a candidate yet, but I don't expect |
pnwmom |
Sep-25-07 01:18 AM |
#1 |
  -
I don't expect to agree on everything with a candidate but Hillary is so far apart from the others |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:25 AM |
#3 |
| -
Look at Obama's and Clinton's records in the Senate. |
pnwmom |
Sep-25-07 10:09 AM |
#76 |
| -
I was talking to one of her most prominent supporters in the state recently |
thecatburgler |
Sep-25-07 01:22 AM |
#2 |
| -
That is EXACTLY my point. I have afriend who has given her mega bucks and bundled a whole lot more |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:27 AM |
#6 |
| -
What is their explanation, then, of why they ARE supporting her? nt |
gateley |
Sep-25-07 01:31 AM |
#11 |
| -
They act as though it is "inevitable" and they want to be on the "right' side. |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:36 AM |
#15 |
| -
Hmmm. Interesting. nt |
gateley |
Sep-25-07 03:23 AM |
#45 |
| -
Has it occurred to you that her supporters simply think she would make the best president? |
beaconess |
Sep-25-07 06:55 AM |
#65 |
| -
But why? They do not say why. Edwards and Obama have positions that |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:54 PM |
#85 |
| -
You have never seen a Hillary supporter give substantive reasons why they support her? |
beaconess |
Sep-25-07 08:00 PM |
#100 |
| -
Simple. They expect to get the last jobs in America before the lights get turned out. |
leveymg |
Sep-25-07 01:44 AM |
#21 |
| -
Who's more electable than HRC? |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 01:28 AM |
#7 |
| -
All the polling on the General Election has both Edwards and Obama doing better against the GOP! |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:29 AM |
#8 |
| -
"All" the polling? That's strange. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 01:37 AM |
#17 |
| -
John Edwards is doing better. I did not say she was getting her ass kicked. |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:39 AM |
#19 |
| -
John Edwards only has a meaningful lead in one matchup, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 01:45 AM |
#22 |
| -
In what you posted Edwards does better than Hillary against either Fred or Mitt. |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:52 AM |
#26 |
| -
Meaningfully, I said. As in, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 02:02 AM |
#33 |
| -
I have no idea |
kenfrequed |
Sep-26-07 01:01 AM |
#106 |
| -
Let me edit a bit |
kenfrequed |
Sep-26-07 01:06 AM |
#107 |
| -
Edwards is more electable. |
The Backlash Cometh |
Sep-25-07 06:01 AM |
#61 |
| -
As angry as Americans are with our government and their lack of... |
superkia |
Sep-25-07 04:44 PM |
#98 |
| -
I don't get it either |
Lugnut |
Sep-26-07 12:54 AM |
#105 |
| -
Hillary's "support of outsourcing" is a willful misinterpretation. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 01:26 AM |
#4 |
| -
I posted her quote on outsourcing elsewhere on DU and let me tell you the |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:33 AM |
#13 |
| -
Not all bad things are realistically going to be stopped by government intervention. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 01:40 AM |
#20 |
| -
That is only one of the reasons not to vote for her in the primary. |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:53 AM |
#27 |
| -
I still would like to know why some support her without liking her positions! |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:56 AM |
#28 |
| -
I think it's a matter of people |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 02:07 AM |
#34 |
| -
Thank you for an intelligent , well thought out answer.I have asked some and I posted the answers |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:09 AM |
#37 |
| -
I never ever thought, that i would have a chance to cast a vote for a woman president, and |
Ninga |
Sep-25-07 02:06 PM |
#90 |
| -
However, the government could at least do business with firms |
lapfog_1 |
Sep-25-07 03:19 AM |
#44 |
| -
I read a post here on DU today |
Horse with no Name |
Sep-25-07 01:27 AM |
#5 |
| -
Believe it or not, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 01:30 AM |
#9 |
| -
With all due respect |
Horse with no Name |
Sep-25-07 01:36 AM |
#16 |
| -
...if you have no desire |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 01:45 AM |
#23 |
| -
There is A LOT more to DU than listening to |
Horse with no Name |
Sep-25-07 02:42 AM |
#42 |
| -
I would love to hear her supporters explain why they support her |
Pawel K |
Sep-25-07 10:37 AM |
#78 |
| -
Yes, but that doesn't mean there are no paid operatives. |
DemBones DemBones |
Sep-25-07 01:47 AM |
#24 |
| -
The funny thing about the internet is, what you know isn't always so. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 02:01 AM |
#32 |
| -
I think there is some truth in what you say, Kelly! I don't think DU is important enough to |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:07 AM |
#35 |
| -
You're only forbidden from rejoining if you're tombstoned, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-25-07 02:16 AM |
#39 |
| -
That is how I read it as well. Anyway it is a very interesting theory you have |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:31 AM |
#40 |
| -
How nice |
Horse with no Name |
Sep-25-07 02:47 AM |
#43 |
| -
Not kind of... VERY chickenshit... and sock puppets are against the rules. n/t |
redqueen |
Sep-25-07 01:54 PM |
#84 |
| -
You don't? |
redqueen |
Sep-25-07 01:53 PM |
#83 |
| -
Since you admit to having changed your user name more than once, |
DemBones DemBones |
Sep-25-07 09:40 PM |
#104 |
| -
I don't get it, either. Would I like to see a woman president? |
DemBones DemBones |
Sep-25-07 01:30 AM |
#10 |
| -
I am troubled by that support ... |
Trajan |
Sep-25-07 01:31 AM |
#12 |
| -
I also don't see as much support among some of the rank and file as is indicated in the "polling'. |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:01 AM |
#31 |
| -
People active in the Democratic party-- |
eridani |
Sep-25-07 03:55 AM |
#47 |
| -
Here's a thought: |
aquart |
Sep-25-07 01:34 AM |
#14 |
| -
I am not "sliming " anyone. I would just like to have an answer to the question I ask in the OP |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:37 AM |
#18 |
| -
Excellent. |
emilyg |
Sep-25-07 01:49 AM |
#25 |
| -
Could someone please answer the quesion asked in the OP? |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:58 AM |
#29 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-25-07 02:08 AM |
#36 |
| -
Dammit. I am not "slime" or sliming. I have valid reasons not to support Hillary in the primary. |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:13 AM |
#38 |
| -
I'm not firmly in her camp, but she would be great as Pres/Dem nominee IMO - but your |
papau |
Sep-25-07 08:30 AM |
#68 |
| -
well said. |
CitizenLeft |
Sep-25-07 02:00 AM |
#30 |
| -
YAY ! .... |
Trajan |
Sep-26-07 01:12 AM |
#109 |
| -
I read a policy paper on her "support" |
Jim4Wes |
Sep-25-07 02:42 AM |
#41 |
| -
Actually, it's a proposal to use fees from H1-B visas |
lapfog_1 |
Sep-25-07 03:46 AM |
#46 |
| -
my thoughts |
Jim4Wes |
Sep-25-07 04:48 AM |
#51 |
| -
Just read your response over again... |
lapfog_1 |
Sep-25-07 06:46 AM |
#63 |
| -
Also, where are those who are Dems but who don't support her? |
broadcaster |
Sep-25-07 03:58 AM |
#48 |
| -
It is far easier for Dems to agree on issues IMO-- |
eridani |
Sep-25-07 04:06 AM |
#49 |
| -
kicking for information |
xchrom |
Sep-25-07 04:37 AM |
#50 |
| -
Cognitive Dissonance. |
JTFrog |
Sep-25-07 04:53 AM |
#52 |
| -
Like when |
Jim4Wes |
Sep-25-07 05:11 AM |
#53 |
| -
Like threatening Iran, and continuing to let private insurance kill 18,000 a year? n/t |
eridani |
Sep-25-07 05:18 AM |
#54 |
| -
There is no politican |
Jim4Wes |
Sep-25-07 05:33 AM |
#56 |
| -
Unfortunately you are right |
eridani |
Sep-26-07 02:31 AM |
#110 |
| -
Not even close. |
JTFrog |
Sep-25-07 05:40 AM |
#58 |
| -
Sure, but maybe I didn't put it well |
Jim4Wes |
Sep-25-07 05:55 AM |
#59 |
| -
Again, no. |
JTFrog |
Sep-25-07 06:20 AM |
#62 |
| -
I'm bothered by many things about Hillary |
Enrique |
Sep-25-07 05:30 AM |
#55 |
| -
very good answer |
wyldwolf |
Sep-25-07 05:33 AM |
#57 |
| -
I support Obama, and I could care less about how the GOP will play with Obama. |
Dawgs |
Sep-25-07 07:35 AM |
#67 |
| -
I think she is for outsourcing when she's in India, but against it when she's |
The Backlash Cometh |
Sep-25-07 05:58 AM |
#60 |
| -
Tata's contract was to hire in a depressed area of NY - but they brought in folks from India -taught |
papau |
Sep-25-07 08:33 AM |
#69 |
| -
No kidding. Hillary got fooled,..again? |
The Backlash Cometh |
Sep-25-07 08:35 AM |
#70 |
| -
I have to go but a google should get you the total story - she supported th |
papau |
Sep-25-07 08:42 AM |
#71 |
| -
Hmm...couldn't anybody sue that corp. for racial discrimination? |
The Backlash Cometh |
Sep-25-07 10:28 AM |
#77 |
| -
? - don't think so as they hire anyone - its just the positions are filled via India :-) n/t |
papau |
Sep-25-07 08:24 PM |
#102 |
| -
That doesn't sound like it will hold up to a constitutional challenge. |
The Backlash Cometh |
Sep-26-07 08:24 AM |
#112 |
| -
Seriously? Because she's way better than a Republican, and is looking strong. |
LoZoccolo |
Sep-25-07 06:48 AM |
#64 |
| -
I agree with your view |
Jim4Wes |
Sep-25-07 04:56 PM |
#99 |
| -
Probably because . . . as indicated by your last go-around on this . . . |
HughBeaumont |
Sep-25-07 07:30 AM |
#66 |
| -
Thank god you pointed that out - I think I'll help get republicans elected instead |
LynneSin |
Sep-25-07 08:45 AM |
#72 |
| -
"alerted" For what reason? I asked why some support your candidate? |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:46 PM |
#81 |
| -
Why do you support a candiidate who pretends his Senate career never happened? |
rinsd |
Sep-25-07 02:06 PM |
#91 |
| -
It is okay for you to think that but what has that to do with Lyne alerting on a question? |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:19 PM |
#93 |
| -
Uhm. She has the same health plan as Edwards (confirmed by his wife in an interview) |
Mass |
Sep-25-07 08:48 AM |
#73 |
| -
The usual hypocrisy from the OP's perpetual line of dubious charges.. |
Tellurian |
Sep-25-07 08:55 AM |
#74 |
| -
Ah still no answer about "why" some support your candidate? |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:56 PM |
#86 |
| -
The funding of Edwards program is entirely different. He doesn't rely on "tax credits" and he |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 01:50 PM |
#82 |
| -
That simply is not true. Edwards is using TAX CREDITS to help finance. Its right there in his plan |
rinsd |
Sep-25-07 02:02 PM |
#87 |
| -
His plan does not "rely" solely on tax credits.Where is Hillary's funding ? Where are her rollbacks... |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:25 PM |
#94 |
| -
Sigh Hillary is also funding her plan by rolling back Bush's tax cuts |
rinsd |
Sep-25-07 02:32 PM |
#96 |
| -
Be sure to check out the Lou Dobb videos I posted last night re: Hillary, h1-b visas , outsourcing |
antigop |
Sep-25-07 08:58 AM |
#75 |
| -
crickets....... n/t |
antigop |
Sep-25-07 10:45 AM |
#79 |
| -
Marking this so I'll be sure to check back later... |
redqueen |
Sep-25-07 02:03 PM |
#88 |
| -
Good Points. n/t |
OhioChick |
Sep-25-07 11:02 AM |
#80 |
| -
Hilary seeks to remove tax breaks from outsourcing companies |
rinsd |
Sep-25-07 02:05 PM |
#89 |
| -
The mandatory provision of Hillary's is that she demands you have health insurance. |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:17 PM |
#92 |
| -
Are you even familiar with Edwards plan? Here's a PDF. |
rinsd |
Sep-25-07 02:28 PM |
#95 |
| -
I disagree with your interpretation.The verbiage on the announcement is interesting as well.Note |
saracat |
Sep-25-07 02:41 PM |
#97 |
| -
People want to be on the winning side... |
polichick |
Sep-25-07 08:02 PM |
#101 |
| -
"Bothered" . . .. ??? I find it all frightening -- !!!! |
defendandprotect |
Sep-25-07 09:03 PM |
#103 |
| -
Many Hillaristas are members of the investor class, not the working class |
IndianaGreen |
Sep-26-07 01:09 AM |
#108 |
| -
The definition of a Hillary Clinton supporter: |
Steve_in_California |
Sep-26-07 03:37 AM |
#111 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread