You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Figures Reveal Aggressive GOP Obstructionist Strategy by Sam Stein [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 08:08 AM
Original message
New Figures Reveal Aggressive GOP Obstructionist Strategy by Sam Stein
Advertisements [?]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/09/21/new-figures-re...

This past Wednesday, for the second time in almost as many months, Senator Jim Webb, D-VA, introduced a piece of Iraq war legislation that failed to pass the Senate despite gaining a majority of its votes.

Technically speaking, Webb's measure - which would have given soldiers as much time at home as their previous tour deployed - was not filibustered. Prior to its introduction, Senate Democrats and Republicans agreed that, in order to avoid a procedural tit-for-tat, there would be a 60-vote threshold on all Defense Authorization amendments. Nevertheless, seeing his pet project defeated for the second time, even with the support of 55 other Senators, left Webb a bit steamed.
"I would say to my colleagues that the American people are watching us today, and they are watching closely," the Virginian declared. "They are tired of the posturing that is giving the Congress such a bad reputation. And they are tired of the procedural strategies designed to protect politicians from accountability."


I think Webb is right. Less polite procedures and more fight! Stop it with the gentlemen's agreements.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -New Figures Reveal Aggressive GOP Obstructionist Strategy by Sam Stein rusty quoin  Sep-22-07 08:08 AM   #0 
  - He could start with his MoveOn vote.  uberblonde   Sep-22-07 08:31 AM   #1 
  - The Moveon resolution should not have gotten to the floor.  rusty quoin   Sep-22-07 08:39 AM   #2 
  - 60 votes is a joke  MissWaverly   Sep-22-07 08:42 AM   #3 
     - And why oh why are the Democrats agreeing to a 60 vote threshold  stranger81   Sep-22-07 03:52 PM   #4 
        - I think its so the Mandella myth guy can't veto  MissWaverly   Sep-22-07 06:01 PM   #5 
  - He's a decorated war veteran...  WCGreen   Sep-23-07 12:10 AM   #7 
  - lol! What a bunch of sellouts!  jmp   Sep-22-07 11:22 PM   #6 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC