Totally Committed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. So, you've given up the ghost on Al's running? |
|
Damn!
The "Edwards of 2007" is giving me whiplash. I dunno. "shoulders:
TC
|
| -I Like the John Edwards of 2007 a Lot More Than the John Edwards of 2003. |
David Zephyr |
Aug-27-07 06:53 PM |
#0 |
 -
I think he's going to be the nominee |
ruggerson |
Aug-27-07 06:56 PM |
#1 |
  -
I'm curious to see the polls that come out in the next few weeks. |
David Zephyr |
Aug-27-07 07:32 PM |
#8 |
| -
me too |
AtomicKitten |
Aug-27-07 06:56 PM |
#2 |
| -
So, you've given up the ghost on Al's running? |
Totally Committed |
Aug-27-07 07:17 PM |
#7 |
| -
I really didn't care for the 2004 cycle Democratic campaign. |
AtomicKitten |
Aug-27-07 07:36 PM |
#9 |
| -
Didn't you change your photo? |
Apollo11 |
Aug-29-07 04:54 AM |
#43 |
| -
Yes, I did. |
AtomicKitten |
Aug-29-07 07:16 AM |
#48 |
| -
I was there for his acceptance speech .... |
cleveramerican |
Aug-27-07 07:04 PM |
#3 |
| -
But...but...doesn't the fact the he woke up make him a hypocrite? |
jgraz |
Aug-27-07 07:06 PM |
#4 |
| -
I agree. |
rwheeler31 |
Aug-27-07 07:09 PM |
#5 |
| -
Bill Maher too - |
waiting for hope |
Aug-27-07 07:15 PM |
#6 |
| -
The 2004 Edwards is the real Edwards |
MethuenProgressive |
Aug-28-07 09:36 AM |
#10 |
| -
Edwards is no Dukakis. For one thing, he is not so insular. And he's savvy. |
CTyankee |
Aug-28-07 01:39 PM |
#19 |
| -
You are grasping. n/t |
Inspired |
Aug-28-07 08:37 PM |
#38 |
| -
Well, my opinions have been shaped from my political watches over the last 40 years. |
CTyankee |
Aug-30-07 01:01 PM |
#61 |
| -
Oh, I agree with you. |
Inspired |
Aug-30-07 08:29 PM |
#65 |
| -
Bush isn't a redneck |
LBJDemocrat |
Aug-28-07 09:43 AM |
#11 |
| -
Redneck is a state of mind |
wlucinda |
Aug-28-07 01:14 PM |
#18 |
| -
There are rednecks in New England. |
AllieB |
Aug-28-07 02:36 PM |
#24 |
| -
I'm not yet sold on supporting him over Kucinich but he has been impressing me lately. nt |
Pawel K |
Aug-28-07 10:22 AM |
#12 |
| -
I was Kucinich then Dean in 2004 . . . |
Broke Dad |
Aug-28-07 11:21 AM |
#13 |
| -
Wow Broke Dad, I like your analogy and take on the Edwards of '07. I know Dennis personally, |
Ninga |
Aug-28-07 12:53 PM |
#14 |
| -
I do agree with you. My problem is that Kucinich is very honest about his positions |
Pawel K |
Aug-28-07 12:54 PM |
#15 |
| -
You make an interesting observation. |
David Zephyr |
Aug-28-07 02:05 PM |
#21 |
| -
I don't think Edwards "finally saw" the struggles the poor |
laureloak |
Aug-28-07 02:59 PM |
#28 |
| -
He didn't impress me in 2004. He didn't do what the VP is suppose to do. |
Auntie Bush |
Aug-29-07 08:35 PM |
#55 |
| -
So who do you trust? |
Pawel K |
Aug-30-07 08:55 AM |
#56 |
| -
This isn't the real John Edwards IMO |
maximusveritas |
Aug-28-07 12:59 PM |
#16 |
| -
Empty labels will hardly be a big GE issue |
draft_mario_cuomo |
Aug-28-07 01:09 PM |
#17 |
| -
Yup |
DangerDave921 |
Aug-28-07 04:12 PM |
#30 |
| -
How is that different from Obama? |
sendero |
Aug-29-07 07:26 AM |
#49 |
| -
Distrust |
DangerDave921 |
Aug-29-07 07:34 AM |
#50 |
| -
I think all adults here.. |
sendero |
Aug-29-07 07:40 AM |
#51 |
| -
That's my problem with him. Where was all this populist/poverty talk in 2003? nm |
TeamJordan23 |
Aug-29-07 08:31 PM |
#54 |
| -
I also have to wonder what the Edwards of 2009 will be like. |
Radical Activist |
Aug-31-07 10:20 AM |
#71 |
| -
I hope we're seeing the real John Edwards now... |
polichick |
Aug-28-07 01:45 PM |
#20 |
| -
That's my concern -- Which one is the REAL one? |
Totally Committed |
Aug-28-07 02:11 PM |
#23 |
| -
Lol, pretty hard to tell what's real these days! |
polichick |
Aug-28-07 02:54 PM |
#27 |
| -
TC, any prez will put 1 or 2 token members of the other party in his/her administration |
draft_mario_cuomo |
Aug-28-07 03:13 PM |
#29 |
| -
Agree! Thanks for this post! Brownies Law and "if you let lobbyist at the table they'll |
KoKo01 |
Aug-28-07 02:10 PM |
#22 |
| -
thanks for this... |
rndmprsn |
Aug-28-07 02:42 PM |
#25 |
| -
You've got it, Edwards has evolved even more progressively and beautifully liberal - I love |
LaPera |
Aug-28-07 02:50 PM |
#26 |
| -
"Evolved." Is that what pandering, redefining oneself, and hypocrisy is being called now? nt |
calteacherguy |
Aug-28-07 08:47 PM |
#40 |
| -
another kick for good stuff from Edwards... n/t |
KoKo01 |
Aug-28-07 05:26 PM |
#31 |
| -
K&R for a nice, positive candidate diary :) |
Catchawave |
Aug-28-07 06:20 PM |
#32 |
| -
He's second on my list. |
rucky |
Aug-28-07 06:22 PM |
#33 |
| -
What frightens me is the John Edwards of 2010. |
cigsandcoffee |
Aug-28-07 06:50 PM |
#34 |
| -
Name 1 candidate who has not changed positions. Thanks in advance nt |
draft_mario_cuomo |
Aug-28-07 07:42 PM |
#35 |
| -
From war-hawk to peace-dove is one hell of a position change. |
cigsandcoffee |
Aug-28-07 08:20 PM |
#37 |
| -
A hell of a lot |
JTFrog |
Aug-29-07 05:26 AM |
#44 |
| -
What convinces you he won't be a warhawk again? |
cigsandcoffee |
Aug-29-07 08:05 PM |
#53 |
| -
Was this said by Edwards BEFORE we knew there were no WMD's in Iraq? |
CTyankee |
Aug-30-07 09:19 AM |
#58 |
| -
Most people on this forum were clever enough to doubt Bush and... |
cigsandcoffee |
Aug-30-07 12:41 PM |
#60 |
| -
But we didn't know for sure that Saddam no longer had WMD's. |
CTyankee |
Aug-30-07 01:11 PM |
#62 |
| -
Anyone who says they didn't know Bush would go to war is a liar. |
cigsandcoffee |
Aug-30-07 08:35 PM |
#66 |
| -
"everyone".? Glad you're sure of what every single person knew when they knew it! |
CTyankee |
Aug-31-07 07:07 AM |
#67 |
| -
We didn't know for a certainty that Saddam didn't have WMD |
seasonedblue |
Aug-31-07 11:40 AM |
#73 |
| -
From DLC style Southern moderate to crusading liberal is another big one. |
Radical Activist |
Aug-31-07 10:59 AM |
#72 |
| -
Though not my first choice (second) I think he is pretty cool. |
illinoisprogressive |
Aug-28-07 07:54 PM |
#36 |
| -
But are you "man enough" to vote for Hillary Clinton? nt |
calteacherguy |
Aug-28-07 08:46 PM |
#39 |
| -
I think he noticed the applause Kucinich got for substance in 2003 |
eridani |
Aug-29-07 02:45 AM |
#41 |
| -
Maybe Al Gore will endorse Edwards? |
Apollo11 |
Aug-29-07 04:46 AM |
#42 |
| -
Congress can override it, but probably won't. |
Clark2008 |
Aug-29-07 06:14 AM |
#46 |
| -
A compelling reason |
Apollo11 |
Aug-29-07 07:08 AM |
#47 |
| -
While I understand the rationale of the precedent, when I look at George Marshall |
CTyankee |
Aug-31-07 07:15 AM |
#68 |
| -
Plus there is the LCV |
Apollo11 |
Aug-29-07 10:41 AM |
#52 |
| -
I don't because I don't trust that the Edwards of 2007 is any |
Clark2008 |
Aug-29-07 06:11 AM |
#45 |
| -
me too |
goodhue |
Aug-30-07 08:58 AM |
#57 |
| -
I think he's the most electable one running. |
Forkboy |
Aug-30-07 10:06 AM |
#59 |
| -
Which John Edwards is the real John Edwards? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Aug-30-07 01:18 PM |
#63 |
| -
I agree |
RevolutionStartsNow |
Aug-30-07 01:37 PM |
#64 |
| -
Elizabeth is great |
Apollo11 |
Aug-31-07 10:16 AM |
#70 |
| -
Edwards is the GOP's nightmare. |
Netbeavis |
Aug-31-07 07:35 AM |
#69 |
| -
You're correct, he is the GOP's nightmare. |
slick8790 |
Aug-31-07 12:14 PM |
#74 |
| -
Not according to Elizabeth. She thinks it's Hillary who will energize |
seasonedblue |
Aug-31-07 12:28 PM |
#75 |
| -
I think your missing the point |
Netbeavis |
Aug-31-07 12:53 PM |
#76 |
| -
I disagree with your assessment. |
seasonedblue |
Aug-31-07 01:10 PM |
#77 |
| -
OK, but |
Netbeavis |
Aug-31-07 01:56 PM |
#78 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread