You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #105: He did vote NO, but some people live in a parallel universe...so... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #63
105. He did vote NO, but some people live in a parallel universe...so...
...in their universe, he voted YES.

See?

:think: :think: :think: :think: :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama was thinking about voting for Roberts until told of political consequences of doing so draft_mario_cuomo  Aug-27-07 09:32 AM   #0 
  - He sought good advise, he got it, and he took it..  hlthe2b   Aug-27-07 09:43 AM   #1 
  - It was a scandalous thought  silverlib   Aug-27-07 09:46 AM   #4 
  - So politics overrules his judgement  iconocrastic   Aug-27-07 11:12 AM   #33 
  - He voted based on political reasons yet claims he has the best "judgment"  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 09:49 AM   #5 
  - LOL! A half year old editorial housed on a conservative website...  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 10:16 AM   #10 
  - You obviously are having trouble dealing with the "New politics."  Benhurst   Aug-27-07 10:25 AM   #13 
  - whoops wrong thread-delete nt  fed-up   Aug-27-07 10:44 AM   #26 
  - Obama has always been far too moderate-conserative for my taste!!  GreenTea   Aug-27-07 09:45 AM   #2 
  - Gee if Hillary did that Obama supporters would be boucing up  Bitwit1234   Aug-27-07 09:45 AM   #3 
  - Smart move by Obama.  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 09:53 AM   #6 
  - Judgment=voting based on political calculation? If he was told to vote for JR he would have!  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 09:55 AM   #7 
     - Judgment = he did the right thing.  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 10:06 AM   #8 
        - He only did so for political reasons. That is political calculation, not "judgment" nt  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:31 AM   #16 
           - The article did not say he did it ONLY for political reasons  never cry wolf   Aug-27-07 01:03 PM   #61 
  - The fox and the scorpion.  wyldwolf   Aug-27-07 10:12 AM   #9 
  - Of course, John Edwards *did* vote for Roberts in 2003  WesDem   Aug-27-07 10:16 AM   #11 
  - Oh, Man! Here are two Committee votes by Edwards in support of the Hon. Roberts.  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 10:20 AM   #12 
  - "he Senate confirmed Roberts to his seat on the D.C. Circuit by unanimous consent"  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:30 AM   #15 
     - Obama voted NO on Roberts in his only opportunity to do so. Edwards twice voted YES on Roberts.  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 10:37 AM   #20 
     - As did 99 other senators. What changed from 2003 and 2005 on Roberts?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:39 AM   #23 
        - Proving yet again Edwards doesn't have the courage to lead.  returnable   Aug-27-07 11:22 AM   #34 
           - The same reason Feingold did not vote against Roberts  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 11:24 AM   #35 
              - Oh, so if Feingold does it, it's OK?  returnable   Aug-27-07 11:33 AM   #38 
                 - You don't understand the difference between lower court appointments and SCOTUS appointments  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 11:41 AM   #40 
                    - I understand the diffference. And I also know spin when I see it.  returnable   Aug-27-07 11:48 AM   #42 
                       - You don't understand the story is Obama cast his vote due to political reasons, not "judgment"?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 11:59 AM   #46 
                          - So when "Edwards voted incorrectly in committee", was it for political reasons...  returnable   Aug-27-07 12:35 PM   #55 
                             - Who knows but we know it wasn't for political reasons because no one cared about JR in 2003  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 12:52 PM   #57 
     - After looking all the way down this page, not interested in participating.  robinlynne   Aug-27-07 04:05 PM   #98 
  - I won't hold my breath waiting for you to mention how nominations for lower courts work  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:28 AM   #14 
  - Obama is supposed to be the candidate of change yet  Lirwin2   Aug-27-07 10:32 AM   #17 
  - Funny isn't it? They even do so when they have to conflate two very different votes  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:37 AM   #21 
  - I don't have a candidate (I repeat) and you do  WesDem   Aug-27-07 10:39 AM   #22 
     - What percentage of lower court nominations are opposed? What % are confirmed?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:43 AM   #25 
        - I'm a "de facto Obama supporter"?  WesDem   Aug-27-07 10:53 AM   #30 
           - Have you ever criticized his dozens of votes for right-wing justices?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 11:00 AM   #31 
              - Indeed I have criticized Obama on his judiciary votes  WesDem   Aug-27-07 11:05 AM   #32 
  - Don't do that! You'll make the OP's head explode....  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 10:32 AM   #18 
  - You evidently don't know how lower court appointments work  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:34 AM   #19 
     - Explain this...  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 10:41 AM   #24 
        - What was the final vote on him? Ask Obama, who has voted for dozens of right-wingers  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:45 AM   #27 
           - Dude, you are exposed and OUT OF AMMO  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 10:49 AM   #28 
              - Only among those ignorant on the subject  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 10:52 AM   #29 
                 - Explain your support for Edwards despite his vote for Roberts  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 11:25 AM   #36 
                    - The same reason you support Obama despite his votes for all of these right-wingers for lower courts  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 11:30 AM   #37 
                       - Point is, Edwards had two opportunities to vote against Roberts IN COMMITTEE and failed to do so  returnable   Aug-27-07 11:45 AM   #41 
                       - Durbin, Kennedy, and Schumer all voted for him on the Senate floor  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 11:55 AM   #45 
                       - Do you have a link for that list?  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 11:54 AM   #43 
                          - They are all Bush appointees. Do you think Bush appointed liberals?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 12:00 PM   #47 
                             - Edwards voted for these right wing judges.......when he showed up to the committee to vote.....  FrenchieCat   Aug-27-07 01:03 PM   #62 
                                - Of course he did. Remember, he was a self-described "Centrist" and chummed  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 01:06 PM   #65 
                                - Ideology has little do with with the 200+ year record on confirming lower court judges  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:14 PM   #69 
                                - As he should have. How many of those were confirmed unamiously?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:13 PM   #68 
                                   - Your response on Edwards that he confirmed them....."as he should have".........smells......  FrenchieCat   Aug-27-07 01:21 PM   #79 
                                      - 99.999% of lower court judges are confirmed unanimously  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:23 PM   #82 
                                         - I don't really need to "provide" you with anything, considering that this is an "attack" OP,  FrenchieCat   Aug-27-07 01:50 PM   #87 
                                         - You apparently have no clue how lower court appointments work  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:58 PM   #90 
                                         - You apparently have no clue as to how an "attack" op works.......  FrenchieCat   Aug-27-07 02:09 PM   #95 
                                            - I don't need to teach judicial appointments 101  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 02:11 PM   #96 
                                            - Why do you think BO voted for the egregious Priscilla Owen?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 05:06 PM   #106 
                                         - Here's the link he had in mind  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 04:49 PM   #103 
                                         - The vote wasn't unanimous in committee...  returnable   Aug-27-07 01:56 PM   #89 
                                         - It was unanimous when it counted on the senate floor. Why?  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 02:01 PM   #91 
                                            - The question to ask is why did SOME, but not John, vote against him in committee?  returnable   Aug-27-07 02:13 PM   #97 
                                               - Only Kennedy and Durbin voted against him the second time  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 04:33 PM   #100 
                                         - So your beef about Obama's lower court votes and how they are usually...  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 04:47 PM   #102 
  - bwahahahahha  Scriptor Ignotus   Aug-27-07 01:31 PM   #85 
  - Not exactly. Only if you missed the real story in the OP and don't understand the Senate/courts  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:33 PM   #86 
  - Isn't that an apples/oranges sort of thing  LittleClarkie   Aug-27-07 01:55 PM   #88 
     - They seem to think there will never be a Democratic president  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 02:06 PM   #93 
  - Only DMC would slam Obama for NOT voting for Roberts ---  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 11:36 AM   #39 
  - I don't know AK,  seasonedblue   Aug-27-07 12:01 PM   #48 
  - Read the thread for the answer  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 12:04 PM   #49 
  - So you're saying that Edwards voted his conscience  seasonedblue   Aug-27-07 12:13 PM   #51 
  - He voted for a lower ct. appointment for the same reasons senators have been doing so for 200+ years  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 12:23 PM   #54 
  - So why then did Edwards vote YES on Roberts TWICE?  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 01:08 PM   #66 
     - Senate tradition. The same reason 90+ senators did and 0 voted against him  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:16 PM   #72 
        - So you stand by your criticism of Obama for voting NO on Roberts while Edwards voted YES TWICE.  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 01:19 PM   #75 
  - I think my personal favorite was when he --  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 12:07 PM   #50 
     - It's breathtaking ROFLMAO  seasonedblue   Aug-27-07 12:15 PM   #52 
     - Or his persistent baseless smears against Obama for being DLC...only that he isn't...  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 01:10 PM   #67 
        - he's a sloppy provocateur --  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 01:15 PM   #70 
        - Giving money to 72% of the Senate DLC is not a "smear". The DLC is part of the party nt  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:17 PM   #73 
  - Edwards YES twice on Roberts.  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 01:01 PM   #60 
  - shit. How could he even consider voting for Roberts. We all knew what that  robinlynne   Aug-27-07 11:55 AM   #44 
  - Obama voted AGAINST Roberts.  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 12:15 PM   #53 
  - yes I do. And I understand that his inclination was to vote for him, but a poltical  robinlynne   Aug-27-07 12:47 PM   #56 
     - fwiw  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 12:59 PM   #58 
        - He licks his finger to see which way the wind is blowing. NT  William769   Aug-27-07 01:01 PM   #59 
           - Obama does his homework.  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 01:05 PM   #64 
           - He's a bot - needs people to tell him what to do. Think he'll hire Bob Shrum?  wyldwolf   Aug-27-07 01:16 PM   #71 
              - Lame. (nt)  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 01:18 PM   #74 
              - LOL!  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 01:20 PM   #77 
              - Projection? When have the Clintons ever enlisted Bob Shrum?  wyldwolf   Aug-27-07 01:24 PM   #83 
                 - Wasn't Shrum Bill's speechwriter for years?  WesDem   Aug-27-07 04:39 PM   #101 
              - WW, can you tell us whether 99.99999% of Clinton appointees to lower courts sailed through...  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:21 PM   #78 
                 - I recall Al Franken repeatedly making the point the GOP held up Clinton appoitees.  wyldwolf   Aug-27-07 01:23 PM   #81 
                    - That is part of the story. Once a judge gets a vote he/she easily gets confirmed  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:26 PM   #84 
  - Bullshit. Obama exercised good judgment...and voted NO.  jefferson_dem   Aug-27-07 01:05 PM   #63 
     - He exercised political calculation--exactly what he is marketed as being above  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 01:19 PM   #76 
     - the opposite of good judgment is Hill's & Edwards' YES votes on the IWR  AtomicKitten   Aug-27-07 01:22 PM   #80 
     - They ALL exercise political calculation, to some degree. They are POLITICIANS! In the end,  wienerdoggie   Aug-27-07 02:05 PM   #92 
        - Exactly--but he is falsley marketed as being above this nt  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 02:08 PM   #94 
           - I have 2 simple questions for you  Bodhi BloodWave   Aug-27-07 04:16 PM   #99 
     - He did vote NO, but some people live in a parallel universe...so...  zulchzulu   Aug-27-07 04:51 PM   #105 
  - I don't get your reasoning.  Lord Helmet   Aug-27-07 04:50 PM   #104 
     - Lay off the bong and then I'll explain it to you  draft_mario_cuomo   Aug-27-07 05:08 PM   #107 
        - In your twisted opinion Sean!  rufus dog   Aug-27-07 05:11 PM   #108 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC