You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #136: I dismiss it as irrelevant. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #133
136. I dismiss it as irrelevant.

his position on the IWR was irrelevant then, it should remain
irrelevant now. his constituents didn't look to him for national
security, they looked to him for strictly local issues. I am perfectly
prepared to look accept his leadership on foreign policy matters now. but
now his position is virtually indistinguishable from the rest of the pack's,
save the irrepressible denni kucinich.

I am just being consistent. no one cared what he thought then. why
should anyone care what about his past position now?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC