You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #20: Scalia is full of it. USC Title 28 Section 455 covers recusal requirements
[View All]
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. Scalia is full of it. USC Title 28 Section 455 covers recusal requirements |
|
And if a judge does not recuse themselves there are penalties. Of course it requires someone knowing that a judge has a conflict and exposes that judge.
I was involved in a case and the judge made a statement that he knew the opposing party and her family and the problems she has had in her life. My attorney didn't do anything. Later I told him that the judge should be recused because of the conflict of interest. Got a different judge.
My attorney didn't do anything. I practically had to educate the worthless nimwit.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread