You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #65: Yes. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. Yes.
Edited on Tue Jul-24-07 03:48 PM by LWolf
<snip>

QUESTION: Good evening, America. My name is Jered Townsend from Clio, Michigan.

To all the candidates, tell me your position on gun control, as myself and other Americans really want to know if our babies are safe.

This is my baby, purchased under the 1994 gun ban. Please tell me your views.

Thank you.

COOPER: Governor Richardson, you have one of the highest NRA ratings.

RICHARDSON: The issue here, I believe, is instant background checks.

RICHARDSON: Nobody who has a criminal background or is mentally ill should be able to get a weapon. That is the key, and that includes gun sales. That includes gun sales at gun shows.

The key is going to be also attacking poverty, bringing people together, dealing with those kids in the ghettos that are heavy users of gun violence and they are victims of gun violence, to make sure that this country attacks the core problems of poverty, having child care, bringing parents together.

COOPER: Senator Biden, are you going to be able to keep his baby safe?

BIDEN: I'll tell you what, if that is his baby, he needs help.

I agree that it was a good response.

Oops! Edited to add link:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/23/debate.transcrip...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Clinton lied in the debate last night welshTerrier2  Jul-24-07 11:08 AM   #0 
  - Amen.  MLFerrell   Jul-24-07 11:09 AM   #1 
  - So don't vote for her in the primaries. nt  onehandle   Jul-24-07 11:10 AM   #2 
  - I was not planning too..  movonne   Jul-24-07 11:13 AM   #3 
     - Good.  William769   Jul-24-07 11:16 AM   #7 
  - For this reason, I think the man who should be President is Kuchinich  MrMickeysMom   Jul-24-07 11:13 AM   #4 
  - I loved Kuchinich's response to the nut with his "baby"...  zanne   Jul-24-07 01:14 PM   #53 
     - That was Biden. n/t  LWolf   Jul-24-07 01:16 PM   #54 
        - Are you sure LWolf?  zanne   Jul-24-07 01:17 PM   #55 
           - LWolf--You were right, I was wrong.  zanne   Jul-24-07 01:46 PM   #57 
           - Yes.  LWolf   Jul-24-07 03:47 PM   #65 
  - And a link to what she said on January 17, 2007?  William769   Jul-24-07 11:14 AM   #5 
  - here you go ...  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 11:16 AM   #6 
     - Thank you.  William769   Jul-24-07 11:16 AM   #8 
     - self delete, posted wrong place.  William769   Jul-24-07 11:22 AM   #11 
        - i originally had the second part and chose to remove it  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 11:28 AM   #16 
           - I know your disdain for Hillary.  William769   Jul-24-07 11:30 AM   #17 
           - please continue below  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 11:32 AM   #20 
              - Heres a newsflash for you, people who purposely misquote  William769   Jul-24-07 03:20 PM   #61 
           - The NYT magazine's "Hillary's War" showed it was not only not her position  karynnj   Jul-24-07 12:47 PM   #42 
  - I decided when hillary announced her candidacy that she would  Faux pas   Jul-24-07 11:20 AM   #9 
  - Hillary Lieberman. (nt)  Jackpine Radical   Jul-24-07 11:21 AM   #10 
  - Here is the full quote.  William769   Jul-24-07 11:22 AM   #12 
  - Now you are  obnoxiousdrunk   Jul-24-07 11:27 AM   #14 
  - Wait - you mean an anti-Hillary person selectively quoted her to try  NYC Liberal   Jul-24-07 11:30 AM   #18 
  - she said she opposes timelines  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 11:35 AM   #22 
  - She did not say she opposes timelines.  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 11:40 AM   #25 
  - Really?  NYC Liberal   Jul-24-07 12:01 PM   #31 
     - what do I think of it?  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 12:05 PM   #33 
  - the Tucker Carlson brand of politics  Supersedeas   Jul-24-07 03:58 PM   #67 
  - the full quote changes nothing  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 11:31 AM   #19 
  - It changes who the liar is.  William769   Jul-24-07 03:22 PM   #62 
  - I'm sorry, but 'as soon as possible' is a completely meaningless term  Husb2Sparkly   Jul-24-07 11:41 AM   #26 
  - It has a significant meaning to a professional creating a timeline.  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 11:51 AM   #29 
     - project management  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 12:00 PM   #30 
     - I am not talking about benchmarks.  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 12:12 PM   #34 
        - you are implying conditionality  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 12:24 PM   #37 
           - It surely would be ideal if we could airlift the troops out overnight.  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 12:39 PM   #39 
     - Not exactly true  Husb2Sparkly   Jul-24-07 12:36 PM   #38 
        - How would you know "we expect that will take six to eight months"  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 12:43 PM   #40 
           - Are you intentionally or naturally obtuse?  Husb2Sparkly   Jul-24-07 12:52 PM   #46 
              - Obtuse? Of course I knew they were hypothetical.  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 01:04 PM   #48 
                 - Apology accepted  Husb2Sparkly   Jul-24-07 01:08 PM   #50 
                    - The war is over and we're on defense.  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 01:13 PM   #52 
  - And health care in her second term  sandnsea   Jul-24-07 12:46 PM   #41 
  - Great doubletalk.  LWolf   Jul-24-07 01:18 PM   #56 
  - So, because you do not know the difference between a beginning time line and a date certain ...  Maribelle   Jul-24-07 11:25 AM   #13 
  - Obama lied in the debate last night  wyldwolf   Jul-24-07 11:28 AM   #15 
  - well, fine ... then there are two liars we should NOT support  welshTerrier2   Jul-24-07 11:37 AM   #24 
  - your OP has already been disputed  wyldwolf   Jul-24-07 11:44 AM   #28 
     - Where?  Dawgs   Jul-24-07 12:48 PM   #43 
        - in fantasy "hillary isn't a war monger" land  BrokenBeyondRepair   Jul-24-07 12:51 PM   #45 
        - post 23  wyldwolf   Jul-24-07 12:54 PM   #47 
  - Oooh yeah, that's a real doozie...or maybe not so much  BeyondGeography   Jul-24-07 01:59 PM   #59 
  - A politician lying-- will wonders never cease? n/t  TreasonousBastard   Jul-24-07 11:33 AM   #21 
  - You're not accurate.  jobycom   Jul-24-07 11:36 AM   #23 
  - There was no Feingold amendment for withdrawal voted on in 2005  karynnj   Jul-24-07 01:06 PM   #49 
     - no?  wyldwolf   Jul-24-07 01:49 PM   #58 
     - The amendments Hillary voted for in 2005 were the Levin and Warner ones  karynnj   Jul-24-07 03:56 PM   #66 
     - None of that's what I said.  jobycom   Jul-24-07 02:45 PM   #60 
        - Two years after he proposed it - She did not vote for it in 2006, when only 13 senators voted for it  Mass   Jul-24-07 07:16 PM   #71 
  - Did she lie?  hughee99   Jul-24-07 11:42 AM   #27 
  - Golly the republicans don't have to bash Hillary her own party is.  Bitwit1234   Jul-24-07 12:02 PM   #32 
  - How is this bashing?  Dawgs   Jul-24-07 12:49 PM   #44 
     - No kidding. Why do Dems get a 'free pass' just because they're NOT Republicans. nt  mistertrickster   Jul-25-07 08:47 AM   #74 
  - strategy is evolving as do events on the ground  AtomicKitten   Jul-24-07 12:13 PM   #35 
  - Hillary will never get my vote, no matter what.  realbluesky   Jul-24-07 12:20 PM   #36 
  - Go ahead be one of those who takes your ball and goes home.  William769   Jul-24-07 03:24 PM   #63 
     - They look pretty good to me.  Dawgs   Jul-24-07 07:02 PM   #68 
  - oh for petey's sake--she did not lie!  rodeodance   Jul-24-07 01:10 PM   #51 
  - she has been trying to claim she has been against the war for years now.  illinoisprogressive   Jul-24-07 03:30 PM   #64 
  - Here's her speech before she voted for the IWR  killbotfactory   Jul-24-07 07:12 PM   #70 
  - Accurate post....  EndElectoral   Jul-24-07 07:11 PM   #69 
  - I believe Oprah is a bigger threat to Hillary then Bill is to Obama...!  Imagevision   Jul-24-07 10:35 PM   #72 
  - AGREE! She should run with Joe Leiberman. It would be almost like  mistertrickster   Jul-25-07 08:45 AM   #73 
  - Timeline does not equal Deadline  jmp   Jul-25-07 08:57 AM   #75 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC