LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
|
She would seem quite serious.
|
| -Why do we allow Cindy Sheehan threads?Hasn't she announced |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:15 PM |
#0 |
-
Did she announce? |
seasonedblue |
Jul-23-07 03:16 PM |
#1 |
 -
MAybe she is going to run as a Democrat |
Vincardog |
Jul-23-07 03:17 PM |
#2 |
  -
Cindy isn't a Democrat.She announced she would run as an Independent. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:19 PM |
#5 |
 -
She said she would run against Pelosi if Pelosi dfidn't put "impeachment back on the table. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:18 PM |
#4 |
-
You think what is wrong? |
Tunkamerica |
Jul-23-07 07:00 PM |
#65 |
-
If she's making the news, why not? No different than allowing threads |
wienerdoggie |
Jul-23-07 03:18 PM |
#3 |
 -
But no one is supporting the repugs.That is against our rules. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:20 PM |
#6 |
  -
As long as nobody says, "You should vote for Cindy" or suggests |
wienerdoggie |
Jul-23-07 03:32 PM |
#19 |
   -
Actually the user rules state you can't use the board to organize against Dems. |
mzmolly |
Jul-23-07 08:48 PM |
#86 |
  -
Pelosi may have an opponent or two in the primary as well. She may not be the |
John Q. Citizen |
Jul-23-07 03:33 PM |
#21 |
 -
As usual |
stimbox |
Jul-23-07 05:49 PM |
#52 |
 -
threads are allowed, but if she runs as an Indie, support for her against |
AZDemDist6 |
Jul-23-07 03:23 PM |
#9 |
-
simply stating support does not violate anything |
Tunkamerica |
Jul-23-07 07:03 PM |
#66 |
-
perhaps it is because |
leftchick |
Jul-23-07 03:21 PM |
#7 |
-
The admins will have to rule on that shortly. I was wondering |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-23-07 03:22 PM |
#8 |
-
so that means we shouldn't be able to discuss anything about her? nt |
NotGivingUp |
Jul-23-07 03:23 PM |
#10 |
 -
No.But you can't support her caididacy.Read the rules. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:34 PM |
#22 |
-
NOBODY is going to tell me who I can or cannot support. nt |
NotGivingUp |
Jul-23-07 09:14 PM |
#88 |
-
You can support her over Pelosi. Just not here. |
LittleClarkie |
Jul-23-07 09:17 PM |
#89 |
-
So what if Cindy wants to run...I'm getting so tired of these posts |
movonne |
Jul-23-07 03:24 PM |
#11 |
 -
.. |
seasonedblue |
Jul-23-07 03:25 PM |
#13 |
  -
No he was not...but does that make it wrong to vote for someone |
movonne |
Jul-23-07 04:43 PM |
#40 |
 -
I was referring to DU |
seasonedblue |
Jul-23-07 07:11 PM |
#68 |
 -
Was Bernie challenging an incumbant Democrat? |
truebrit71 |
Jul-23-07 03:26 PM |
#14 |
-
Sorry, but this fucking war is beyond politics. |
marylanddem |
Jul-23-07 03:25 PM |
#12 |
 -
Great, so the Dems can get tarred with the same brush as Cindy if they try and impeach... |
truebrit71 |
Jul-23-07 03:27 PM |
#15 |
  -
Tarred by who & with what brush? Don't get what you mean. |
marylanddem |
Jul-23-07 03:28 PM |
#16 |
 -
The "party that listens and is motiviated by whacko's" brush... |
truebrit71 |
Jul-23-07 03:31 PM |
#18 |
 -
Sorry but we have rule.No supporting of non democratic candidat!es |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:33 PM |
#20 |
-
Bernie Sanders? I support him. Don't you? |
John Q. Citizen |
Jul-23-07 03:38 PM |
#23 |
-
Not if he runs against a Democrat .Read the DU Rulebelow |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:42 PM |
#24 |
-
Oh, that's not what you said before. You said |
John Q. Citizen |
Jul-23-07 03:49 PM |
#26 |
 -
What part of you can't work to defeat a Democrat don't you get? |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:53 PM |
#27 |
  -
The part you expressed in your post #20. It was incorrect, not that you would admit that. |
John Q. Citizen |
Jul-23-07 04:05 PM |
#31 |
   -
Sorry.I was unclear! |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 04:11 PM |
#34 |
  -
what part of supporting someone implies |
Tunkamerica |
Jul-23-07 07:08 PM |
#67 |
 -
If Zell runs as a Dem against Sanders , you cannot support the defeat of Zell on DU. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 03:57 PM |
#29 |
-
I think you may have to report me to the Missoula Co. Democratic Central Committe. |
John Q. Citizen |
Jul-23-07 04:10 PM |
#33 |
-
You could have been removed.Check it out.Did he have a Dem opponent? |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 04:18 PM |
#35 |
-
Not to my knowledge. Most Dems are smarter than that. |
John Q. Citizen |
Jul-23-07 04:32 PM |
#38 |
-
Thats okay then.No opponent. Don't know.Most of Liberman supports were GOP. I don't know ANY PC's wh |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 04:49 PM |
#41 |
-
Hey, I've got a question about that statement- |
MrMickeysMom |
Jul-23-07 05:51 PM |
#53 |
-
You can "discuss' Cindy on DU.You can't promote her candidacy as an Independent against a Democrat! |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 05:59 PM |
#56 |
-
I believe you cut and paste that comment already. |
MrMickeysMom |
Jul-23-07 06:05 PM |
#60 |
-
Again.Discuss what you want.And whether these people are Democrats doesn't matter. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 06:14 PM |
#62 |
-
What in the hell are you so frightened of? Fascism in America? |
defendandprotect |
Jul-23-07 03:30 PM |
#17 |
 -
Cindy put the ANTI in the WAR---------of course we can talk of her. |
rodeodance |
Jul-23-07 03:48 PM |
#25 |
  -
Oh bullshit. |
acmavm |
Jul-23-07 03:55 PM |
#28 |
 -
my point is--Camp Casey got national attention ----prob. the first sustained |
rodeodance |
Jul-23-07 07:49 PM |
#77 |
 -
I agree |
NotGonnaTakeIt |
Jul-23-07 08:31 PM |
#83 |
-
So we shouldn't be allowed to discuss Cindy Sheehan? |
Cleita |
Jul-23-07 04:04 PM |
#30 |
 -
She can be discussed.Her candidacy can't be supported. That is all. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 04:10 PM |
#32 |
-
Then you should rephrase your thread titles. n/t |
Cleita |
Jul-23-07 04:23 PM |
#36 |
 -
You are right! Time expired. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 04:24 PM |
#37 |
-
Blind party loyalty, anyone? |
DancingBear |
Jul-23-07 05:43 PM |
#51 |
-
So you think the DU rule is "disgusting? |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 06:01 PM |
#57 |
-
If the choices are a woman who wants to stop the senseless killing NOW |
DancingBear |
Jul-23-07 06:36 PM |
#64 |
-
I think we can be supportive of her activism |
lwfern |
Jul-23-07 04:40 PM |
#39 |
-
Per the DU rules: |
MiltonF |
Jul-23-07 04:50 PM |
#42 |
 -
Not as a candidate,per DU rules.See below |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 05:33 PM |
#48 |
-
I stand corrected. |
MiltonF |
Jul-23-07 05:37 PM |
#49 |
-
Thank you.I was unclear as well intitally! |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 05:38 PM |
#50 |
-
Why are you afraid of Cindy Sheehan? |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-23-07 04:53 PM |
#43 |
 -
That is not a fair assessment of what is being said. She doesn't like Democrats. |
madfloridian |
Jul-23-07 05:08 PM |
#44 |
  -
Oh, bullshit. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-23-07 05:15 PM |
#45 |
   -
What part of what I said is not true? |
madfloridian |
Jul-23-07 05:18 PM |
#46 |
   -
Madflo rarely kids |
LittleClarkie |
Jul-23-07 07:29 PM |
#75 |
  -
I would never vote Cindy for any office but I can understand why she is pissed. |
MiltonF |
Jul-23-07 05:29 PM |
#47 |
   -
Perhaps you missed all the hearings they have had. |
madfloridian |
Jul-23-07 05:56 PM |
#55 |
  -
Sometimes I don't like Democrats!! |
NotGonnaTakeIt |
Jul-23-07 08:37 PM |
#84 |
 -
Why do you hate America? |
LittleClarkie |
Jul-23-07 07:28 PM |
#74 |
-
Why do we allow LIEberman threads then? |
bigwillq |
Jul-23-07 05:55 PM |
#54 |
 -
Sorry about confusion.Threads are okay.Support of a non Dem against a Dem is NOT. |
saracat |
Jul-23-07 06:02 PM |
#58 |
-
Yeah, that rule has confused me too |
bigwillq |
Jul-23-07 06:04 PM |
#59 |
-
Why do you ask the forum at large and not the Admins? |
Forkboy |
Jul-23-07 06:08 PM |
#61 |
-
She's only threatened. She has officially begun a campaign yet. |
AZBlue |
Jul-23-07 06:34 PM |
#63 |
-
Honestly, these bullying posts of yours are evocative of right wing tactics. |
Bonobo |
Jul-23-07 07:14 PM |
#69 |
 -
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
NotGonnaTakeIt |
Jul-23-07 08:41 PM |
#85 |
-
Cindy Sheehan threads are fine. "Vote CIndy Sheehan" threads are not |
LittleClarkie |
Jul-23-07 07:16 PM |
#70 |
 -
No, you make up shit about Nader |
DancingBear |
Jul-23-07 07:18 PM |
#71 |
-
I changed my reply before you posted. The thread's not about Nader |
LittleClarkie |
Jul-23-07 07:27 PM |
#73 |
-
I wasn't speaking to you personally |
DancingBear |
Jul-23-07 08:06 PM |
#80 |
-
K and R. |
smiley_glad_hands |
Jul-23-07 07:20 PM |
#72 |
-
Suggestion - move or start Sheehan threads in a separate place, |
whutgives |
Jul-23-07 07:44 PM |
#76 |
 -
rhetorically putting people into caged off areas/building fences? no. |
rodeodance |
Jul-23-07 07:59 PM |
#78 |
-
Same reason why Bush threads, Cheney Threads, Condi threads are allowed |
dugggy |
Jul-23-07 08:05 PM |
#79 |
-
Uh, they're allowed due to "freedom of speech"? |
ProudDad |
Jul-23-07 08:06 PM |
#81 |
-
I dont get it, you have been posting this |
here_is_to_hope |
Jul-23-07 08:07 PM |
#82 |
-
For someone who was going to quit Democratic Underground last month, |
maryallen |
Jul-23-07 09:11 PM |
#87 |
-
I'm locking this thread |
proud patriot |
Jul-23-07 09:22 PM |
#90 |