You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: That means anyone could win so why not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-08-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. That means anyone could win so why not
nominate someone who will really do something more than maintain the status quo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -More Women Feel Skeptical About Hillary's Authenticity illinoisprogressive  Jul-08-07 07:56 PM   #0 
  - In the last 24 hours, I heard from a pollster that most independents  sfexpat2000   Jul-08-07 08:06 PM   #1 
  - Aha! Here's that poll:  sfexpat2000   Jul-08-07 08:19 PM   #5 
  - Tell me something I didn't already know.  Forkboy   Jul-09-07 07:52 AM   #25 
  - Smarty Pants!  sfexpat2000   Jul-09-07 12:40 PM   #36 
  - We are being driven from this Party by the DLC's cynical triangualation to the Right  Totally Committed   Jul-09-07 07:58 AM   #26 
     - It's the money. We NEED pubilcly funded elections but I don't  sfexpat2000   Jul-09-07 12:41 PM   #37 
  - I'd rather speculate that by 2008 the voters will be so utterly pissed  The_Casual_Observer   Jul-08-07 08:07 PM   #2 
  - I think whoever you nominate will win. So, please be careful.  sfexpat2000   Jul-08-07 08:20 PM   #6 
  - That means anyone could win so why not  Radical Activist   Jul-08-07 09:03 PM   #12 
  - She'd like you to believe that  enough already   Jul-09-07 08:00 AM   #27 
  - An op versus polls.  William769   Jul-08-07 08:09 PM   #3 
  - I personally don't think that she is genuine and that troubles me.  ShortnFiery   Jul-08-07 08:16 PM   #4 
  - I don't want to start a flamewar (famous last words) but nothing she says  sfexpat2000   Jul-08-07 08:22 PM   #7 
  - Agree with you. I was never wowed by the Clintons either  Larkspur   Jul-08-07 10:10 PM   #16 
     - They never rebuilt the Dems---true  Donna Zen   Jul-08-07 11:45 PM   #24 
        - Hillary said that her model was ultra conservative Margaret Thatcher  Larkspur   Jul-09-07 09:25 AM   #30 
           - Tell me you're kidding....please.  Forkboy   Jul-09-07 09:43 AM   #31 
              - Nope, Here's the UK's Time Online article about Hillary being billed as America's Margaret Thatcher  Larkspur   Jul-09-07 02:18 PM   #41 
              - where does this say, "Hillary said that her model was ultra conservative Margaret Thatcher?"  wyldwolf   Jul-09-07 02:21 PM   #43 
              - The opening paragraph  Larkspur   Jul-09-07 03:37 PM   #55 
                 - ummm... still don't see were Hillary said it... nope.... not there.  wyldwolf   Jul-09-07 08:00 PM   #59 
                    - She didn't deny it, so she supports that comparison of herself to Thatcher  Larkspur   Jul-10-07 09:20 AM   #60 
                       - LOL! ummm... still don't see were Hillary said it... nope.... not there.  wyldwolf   Jul-10-07 09:24 AM   #61 
              - And as far as Hillary being a strumpet for corporations, this picture speaks a 1,000 words  Larkspur   Jul-09-07 03:19 PM   #50 
              - where does this say, "Hillary said that her model was ultra conservative Margaret Thatcher?"  wyldwolf   Jul-09-07 03:21 PM   #52 
              - Thanks for the link  Donna Zen   Jul-09-07 03:41 PM   #56 
              - no, she's not kidding, she's being dishonest.  wyldwolf   Jul-09-07 02:20 PM   #42 
                 - Only Clintonistas, like yourself, are dishonest  Larkspur   Jul-09-07 03:13 PM   #48 
                    - Then prove what you said is true. Your link doesn't contain what you claim it does  wyldwolf   Jul-09-07 03:16 PM   #49 
  - Well then, using your logic, you should like *. Afterall, he has not covered up any past love  MichiganVote   Jul-08-07 08:57 PM   #9 
     - I'm sorry but that is how I believe. I've been married 25 years and if I would have had an "hint"  ShortnFiery   Jul-08-07 09:00 PM   #10 
        - Not trying to judge your values but to challenge the way in which you apply them to  MichiganVote   Jul-08-07 10:13 PM   #17 
        - It's not the flaw. We all have personal flaws.  ShortnFiery   Jul-08-07 10:22 PM   #18 
           - I think the whole Clinton marital "pattern" is largely a myth perpetuated by the media. Sells papers  MichiganVote   Jul-08-07 11:20 PM   #22 
              - Thanks MichiganVote, you may be correct.  ShortnFiery   Jul-08-07 11:29 PM   #23 
                 - Well, I think we have enough heat in the country just now...:) take care  MichiganVote   Jul-09-07 04:29 PM   #58 
        - I divorced my wife after she strayed, but I don't apply that  MGKrebs   Jul-09-07 03:13 PM   #47 
        - Just because that's what YOU think you would do (and no one really knows what they'd really do until  beaconess   Jul-10-07 09:44 AM   #64 
        - It's not uncool; it's just unrealistic.  shimmergal   Jul-10-07 10:37 AM   #65 
  - Melinda Henneberger is a fruitcake who lied & spun stories about Al Gore  Alamom   Jul-08-07 08:26 PM   #8 
  - It doesn't matter that the author if the Hillary hit piece is an enemy of DU and most of our ideas  papau   Jul-08-07 09:50 PM   #14 
  - She seems phoney because she bends in the political wind.  Oregonian   Jul-08-07 09:01 PM   #11 
  - Why is that?  MGKrebs   Jul-09-07 03:20 PM   #51 
  - The Great Chameleon and Shape Shifter  insanad   Jul-10-07 09:43 AM   #63 
  - They are attempting to glean her personality from 30 second sound bites  Evergreen Emerald   Jul-08-07 09:07 PM   #13 
  - LOL - I like your suggested means for proving you are "authentic" :-)  papau   Jul-08-07 09:51 PM   #15 
  - Wasn't there a piece within the last week or so about this same thing?  LiberalFighter   Jul-08-07 10:36 PM   #19 
  - Yes, they're having a contest to see who can post the same story..  Tellurian   Jul-08-07 11:10 PM   #21 
  - The women I know here in Kentucky (except the 25% still Bushistas)  MasonJar   Jul-08-07 10:54 PM   #20 
  - The most telling line from the OP  wyldwolf   Jul-09-07 08:02 AM   #28 
  - The author is against Pro-Choice for Dems. Her interviews may be a tad bit slanted.  Alamom   Jul-09-07 08:08 AM   #29 
     - She's not Anti-Choice but attempting to state that there are "shades of gray"  ShortnFiery   Jul-09-07 09:52 AM   #32 
        - I didn't get that.It reads black & white to me ..."a human rights issue comparable to slavery"  Alamom   Jul-09-07 12:04 PM   #33 
           - Ok, but in order to bring in people who feel those "shades of gray" we should be willing to  ShortnFiery   Jul-09-07 12:08 PM   #34 
              - I believe that message has been sent....eom  Alamom   Jul-09-07 12:58 PM   #39 
  - She has more advertising dollars supporting her campaign  bonito   Jul-09-07 12:34 PM   #35 
  - Author made hay trashing Al Gore in 2000...  SaveElmer   Jul-09-07 12:42 PM   #38 
  - ....umm....some men feel that way too.  progressoid   Jul-09-07 01:38 PM   #40 
  - Can somebody explain anything she has done for Women who aren't White and/or College Grads?  slampoet   Jul-09-07 03:01 PM   #44 
  - sure  wyldwolf   Jul-09-07 03:04 PM   #46 
     - wyldwolf, could you give  shimmergal   Jul-10-07 10:56 AM   #66 
  - IMO a whole lot of women would turn out for Hillary, including a lot of new voters.  PBass   Jul-09-07 03:03 PM   #45 
  - Memo from Mark Penn:  MGKrebs   Jul-09-07 03:27 PM   #53 
  - So college educated Dems, like me, are not considered "real Dems" by union busting Mark Penn  Larkspur   Jul-09-07 03:35 PM   #54 
     - I think you mis-read that.  MGKrebs   Jul-09-07 03:50 PM   #57 
  - This is such bullshit - are men polled about whether the male candidates are "authentic?"  beaconess   Jul-10-07 09:41 AM   #62 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC