| 134. That's not evidence. That's bullshit. |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-02-07 05:55 PM by Alexander
People also vote for candidates they can connect with. Otherwise the "who would you rather have a beer with?" question would never have come up during the 2000 race.
You can't prove Clinton won solely on his platform, and I can't prove Clinton won solely on his charisma.
The more you insist that you can prove it, the sillier you look.
You are a Vice President of a PAC. I know it. You know it. Just admit your bias, and the fact that you can't prove your claim, and we can be done.
|
| -What if Hillary Clinton loses the election? |
StudentsMustUniteNow |
Jun-29-07 07:39 PM |
#0 |
 -
How about you say something nice about YOUR candidate |
aquart |
Jun-29-07 07:40 PM |
#1 |
 -
Unless something has changed... HRC "is" Student's candidate.. |
larissa |
Jun-29-07 07:48 PM |
#3 |
| -
Are you being sarcastic? n/t |
StudentsMustUniteNow |
Jun-29-07 07:49 PM |
#5 |
 -
I think she is confusing yours with a similar username. You are an Edwards die-hard no? |
Buck Rabbit |
Jun-29-07 08:00 PM |
#10 |
| -
Hmmmm... Do we have another Students/etc/etc/etc ? |
larissa |
Jun-29-07 08:06 PM |
#12 |
| -
I don't have a clear preferred candidate at the moment |
StudentsMustUniteNow |
Jun-29-07 09:47 PM |
#25 |
| -
Biden? with the disdain you have shown for the DLC? |
rinsd |
Jul-02-07 02:03 PM |
#80 |
| -
Erm... UMass student here... WRONG! |
nothingtoofear |
Jun-29-07 09:59 PM |
#28 |
| -
For as much reading as you do, you don't have a clue do you? |
William769 |
Jul-02-07 12:52 PM |
#51 |
| -
WORD! |
ronnykmarshall |
Jun-29-07 08:48 PM |
#21 |
| -
Our roots? |
wyldwolf |
Jun-29-07 07:45 PM |
#2 |
| -
I want another LBJ. Great Society n/t |
StudentsMustUniteNow |
Jun-29-07 07:49 PM |
#4 |
| -
Unfortunately LBJ Great Society came bundled with LBJ Vietnam War |
NoPasaran |
Jun-29-07 08:11 PM |
#15 |
| -
"I want another LBJ. Great Society" |
durrrty libby |
Jun-29-07 10:11 PM |
#31 |
| -
No offense |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:27 AM |
#161 |
| -
Imagine that! Proudpoppy means no offense! First time for everything, I guess. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 04:59 AM |
#176 |
| -
Johnson followed Kennedy and that was a tough act to follow |
lyonn |
Jul-02-07 01:33 PM |
#68 |
| -
Oh brother. |
fudge stripe cookays |
Jul-02-07 09:39 PM |
#149 |
| -
Remember When Democrats Were Democrats? |
MannyGoldstein |
Jun-29-07 08:02 PM |
#11 |
| -
Revisionist history - the 60s were the only time Democrats were Democrats?? |
wyldwolf |
Jun-30-07 07:02 AM |
#41 |
| -
The only one revising history is you. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:08 PM |
#59 |
| -
I think the revisionism is more on your part |
onenote |
Jul-02-07 05:02 PM |
#126 |
| -
Nope, and once again, I have evidence to shred your silly claims. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 05:27 PM |
#131 |
| -
Nope, and once again, I have evidence to shred your silly claims. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 06:17 PM |
#143 |
| -
Your post didn't say a single thing about JFK's Vietnam policy. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 01:10 AM |
#154 |
| -
Please don't confuse wolfie with facts |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:38 AM |
#163 |
| -
proudpoppy - still in the magic world of make believe. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 04:56 AM |
#174 |
| -
Too bad you can't refute anything on a factual basis. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 05:07 AM |
#180 |
| -
to bad you have to restort to arguing with published authors. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 05:48 AM |
#187 |
| -
Too bad you never addressed my points. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:04 AM |
#194 |
| -
I let the published authors do it for me |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:09 AM |
#199 |
| -
Try again. My points remain unaddressed. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:14 AM |
#202 |
| -
succeeded the first time. Don't need to "try again." |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:16 AM |
#203 |
| -
You succeeded in creating straw men, which is all you ever do. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:17 AM |
#205 |
| -
LOL! Getting touchy, huh? I'll trust the published authors. How many books have you sold again? |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:18 AM |
#207 |
| -
Zero. The same number of times you addressed the points about FDR. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:21 AM |
#211 |
| -
That's right.. You've sold ZERO books. But the authors I used to address your points have sold many |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:23 AM |
#213 |
| -
Except one small problem. You never addressed my points. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:27 AM |
#215 |
| -
the bigger problem for you: They were addressed. You just didn't like it |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:28 AM |
#217 |
| -
So? Since when do you set the agenda? As you said: Game Over, Thanks For Playing |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 04:55 AM |
#173 |
| -
I don't. That was Kennedy's agenda. Do you read anything? |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 05:04 AM |
#178 |
| -
you tried, by attempting to dictate how to discuss it. Do you read your own posts? |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 05:49 AM |
#188 |
| -
You tried to tell me something about JFK that was untrue... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:05 AM |
#195 |
| -
you're arguing with published authors. Looks desperate for you. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:08 AM |
#197 |
| -
Not only are you creating straw men and arguing with published authors... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:13 AM |
#201 |
| -
ah. Playground antics. I demonstrate how you're arguing with published authors... |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:17 AM |
#206 |
| -
This from the guy who repeated himself over 50 times in a thread. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:23 AM |
#212 |
| -
There's another example of your playground antics. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:29 AM |
#218 |
| -
right. And don't forget that JFK proposed cutting tax rates on the rich |
onenote |
Jul-02-07 04:53 PM |
#123 |
| -
exactly right. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 06:18 PM |
#144 |
| -
And who raised taxes in the first place? |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 02:32 AM |
#171 |
| -
"It means nothing" because it undercuts your argument. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 04:57 AM |
#175 |
| -
No, it means nothing because Democrats raised taxes to that point... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 05:06 AM |
#179 |
| -
and it undercuts your argument |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 05:47 AM |
#186 |
| -
Progressive taxation undercuts my argument? |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:06 AM |
#196 |
| -
the fact JFK did something associated with the Right undercuts it. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:10 AM |
#200 |
| -
Not really, because of Vietnam... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:16 AM |
#204 |
| -
he lowered the taxes on the rich because of Viet nam? LOL! |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:19 AM |
#208 |
| -
No. Obviously you just can't read very well. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:25 AM |
#214 |
| -
hey, I'm only repeating what you said. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:31 AM |
#219 |
| -
As if the DLC would give a shit about |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:40 AM |
#164 |
| -
Revisionist? |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:37 AM |
#162 |
| -
Proudpop's daily agenda: First, find posts by wyldwolf. Proudpop has a crush on wyldwolf, ya know |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 04:53 AM |
#172 |
| -
I don't hunt out your posts, wolfie, |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 12:51 PM |
#222 |
| -
Abortion. Gay Rights. Civil Rights. Public Services. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Jul-03-07 12:29 PM |
#221 |
| -
WORD 2 |
ronnykmarshall |
Jun-29-07 08:48 PM |
#22 |
| -
Carter would've won in a landslide... |
Hippo_Tron |
Jun-29-07 10:12 PM |
#32 |
| -
You may be right about Carter and Hart... |
hughee99 |
Jul-02-07 12:59 PM |
#56 |
| -
shoulda, coulda, woulda |
onenote |
Jul-02-07 05:06 PM |
#127 |
| -
Because of Mondale's use of the Wendy's "Where's the beef?" slogan... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 02:24 AM |
#169 |
| -
20/20 hindsight |
onenote |
Jul-03-07 10:29 AM |
#193 |
| -
Mondale's convention "bounce" was negated... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:09 AM |
#198 |
| -
I'd call Carter a centrist |
seasat |
Jul-02-07 01:52 PM |
#76 |
| -
Nope wolfie |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:26 AM |
#160 |
| -
Then It's All Over For Us |
MannyGoldstein |
Jun-29-07 07:52 PM |
#6 |
| -
Don't forget how long since a sitting Senator was elected. |
jaysunb |
Jun-29-07 08:14 PM |
#16 |
| -
We have to go back to work convincing voters that the idea of |
MGKrebs |
Jun-29-07 07:54 PM |
#7 |
| -
You've got it! |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:42 AM |
#165 |
| -
You are so fucking obsessed with HRC, I'm worried for her |
durrrty libby |
Jun-29-07 07:56 PM |
#8 |
| -
If our candidate, whomever that is, doesn't win the White House, it's not the end of |
pinto |
Jun-29-07 07:57 PM |
#9 |
| -
Any Democratic President will have profound changes on the political dynamics. |
Old and In the Way |
Jun-29-07 08:56 PM |
#23 |
| -
We haven't had a primary yet. |
wakemeupwhenitsover |
Jun-29-07 08:08 PM |
#13 |
| -
IT would be a Win Win for the DLC |
wakeme2008 |
Jun-29-07 08:09 PM |
#14 |
| -
If we nominate her, we will lose the presidency. |
Oregonian |
Jun-29-07 08:27 PM |
#17 |
| -
Groan - blah |
emilyg |
Jun-29-07 08:32 PM |
#18 |
| -
I am so ashamed of some women. They are pathetically ignorant |
durrrty libby |
Jun-29-07 08:42 PM |
#19 |
| -
Many are ignorant...both men and women |
calteacherguy |
Jun-29-07 10:27 PM |
#35 |
| -
I tend to agree, at one time I also thought Democratic party would be assertive. |
gordianot |
Jun-29-07 08:45 PM |
#20 |
| -
Perhaps consideration of her as our nominee should make you think. |
MGKrebs |
Jun-29-07 09:05 PM |
#24 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-29-07 09:48 PM |
#26 |
| -
I truly pity your students and hope you get charged for your crimes |
durrrty libby |
Jun-29-07 10:06 PM |
#29 |
| -
What crimes? nt |
calteacherguy |
Jun-29-07 10:25 PM |
#34 |
| -
Hillary lose? Dance, dance dance. Time to party!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
illinoisprogressive |
Jun-29-07 09:52 PM |
#27 |
| -
Still feeling looosey? hehe heh |
durrrty libby |
Jun-29-07 10:07 PM |
#30 |
| -
I don't think we need to go back to our roots, I think we need to move forward |
Hippo_Tron |
Jun-29-07 10:19 PM |
#33 |
| -
Agree. We need to move forward. A Dem Prez w/ a Dem Congress will enable that. |
pinto |
Jun-29-07 10:28 PM |
#36 |
| -
OK, for a start |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:51 AM |
#166 |
| -
Who are the other DLC candidates in the primary race? |
PBass |
Jun-30-07 01:19 AM |
#37 |
| -
Half are or were associated with the DLC |
seasat |
Jul-02-07 01:45 PM |
#72 |
| -
All the major contenders then are DLC |
lyonn |
Jul-02-07 02:00 PM |
#78 |
| -
Misspeak like Dean? |
Le Taz Hot |
Jul-03-07 08:56 AM |
#190 |
| -
Indeed true |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:54 AM |
#167 |
| -
...then we are fucked |
sampsonblk |
Jun-30-07 01:22 AM |
#38 |
| -
What is Hillary tenacious about? |
lyonn |
Jul-02-07 02:14 PM |
#87 |
| -
She is going to lose the primaries, because of the type of question you just asked |
Nimrod2005 |
Jun-30-07 06:18 AM |
#39 |
| -
Buck up, mateys! |
Perry Logan |
Jun-30-07 06:40 AM |
#40 |
| -
I'm greedy, I want it all. |
lyonn |
Jul-02-07 02:25 PM |
#90 |
| -
I don't think she'll make it out of primaries |
tammywammy |
Jun-30-07 11:19 AM |
#42 |
| -
I'm confused? |
sleipnir |
Jul-02-07 11:05 AM |
#43 |
| -
You forgot 1992 and 1996 |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jul-02-07 11:52 AM |
#44 |
| -
Different era n/t |
StudentsMustUniteNow |
Jul-02-07 11:58 AM |
#45 |
| -
Different indeed. Democrats are now smart enough not to nominate candidates who were so far to the |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jul-02-07 12:05 PM |
#46 |
| -
You mean like FDR? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 12:52 PM |
#50 |
| -
FDR was hardly "to the left." Discuss? |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 12:57 PM |
#55 |
| -
I have a feeling you have heard the last of Alexander... |
SaveElmer |
Jul-02-07 01:07 PM |
#58 |
| -
By all means, feel free to chime in... |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:16 PM |
#61 |
| -
FDR threatened to drop out in 1940 if Henry Wallace wasn't his running mate. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:15 PM |
#60 |
| -
No he didn't. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 01:22 PM |
#64 |
| -
Or pandering to southern racists to dampen their opposition to the New Deal... |
SaveElmer |
Jul-02-07 01:32 PM |
#67 |
| -
While at the same time ensuring that black voters would remain Democrats for decades... |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:47 PM |
#73 |
| -
In other words then... |
SaveElmer |
Jul-02-07 02:04 PM |
#81 |
| -
Adding countless new federal programs was "triangulation"? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 02:27 PM |
#92 |
| -
Triangulation... |
SaveElmer |
Jul-02-07 02:41 PM |
#96 |
| -
Triangulation is avoiding taking a position on either the "left" or the "right"... |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 03:06 PM |
#100 |
| -
... |
SaveElmer |
Jul-02-07 03:13 PM |
#104 |
| -
? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 03:40 PM |
#108 |
| -
"Triangulation" is a misnomer |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:56 AM |
#168 |
| -
Again you expect me to believe YOU over quotes from FDR's own mouth... |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:38 PM |
#69 |
| -
what have you posted that came from FDR's own mouth? |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 02:09 PM |
#84 |
| -
Step 1) Read post #69. Step 2) Read the bold text. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 02:31 PM |
#93 |
| -
you posted someone's paraphrasing of his words |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 03:10 PM |
#103 |
| -
Did FDR not threaten to refuse the nomination without Wallace in 1940? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 03:32 PM |
#107 |
| -
Since you're using "quotes from FDR's own mouth..." as a selling point... |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 03:44 PM |
#109 |
| -
I find it odd that you can't cite your "pages of info" you supposedly have |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 03:57 PM |
#112 |
| -
I've seen no need to. Since you've stated "quotes from FDR's own mouth..." are the only... |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 04:04 PM |
#115 |
| -
Your dishonesty continues - I have said no such thing. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 04:18 PM |
#119 |
| -
You're the dishonest one |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 05:14 PM |
#129 |
| -
Not quite. Your sources don't say what you claim. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 05:46 PM |
#132 |
| -
Spot on accurate |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 06:06 PM |
#139 |
| -
Exactly. FDR did not view himself as a liberal. |
Zynx |
Jul-02-07 06:52 PM |
#147 |
| -
So? East Germany saw themselves as a "Democratic Republic". |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 12:58 AM |
#151 |
| -
Yes, I was. Thanks. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 01:03 AM |
#152 |
| -
Again, you're tryin to spin the sources because they undercut your argument |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 05:04 AM |
#177 |
| -
And again, you can't refute anything I've said. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 05:16 AM |
#182 |
| -
don't have to. The books I cited did it for me. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 05:46 AM |
#185 |
| -
No, you addressed completely different issues. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:20 AM |
#209 |
| -
no, you shifted once I cited the sources |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:21 AM |
#210 |
| -
1) FDR threatened to drop out in 1940. Still no source refuting that point. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 11:28 AM |
#216 |
| -
My sources refuted you overall points on Wallace. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 11:32 AM |
#220 |
| -
He gave up on Wallace in 1944 in favor of Truman. |
Zynx |
Jul-02-07 06:00 PM |
#137 |
| -
almost exactly. FDR was strongly considering it for several years |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 06:07 PM |
#140 |
| -
One thing I got out of the Truman biography is that FDR didn't have |
Zynx |
Jul-02-07 06:12 PM |
#142 |
| -
he struggled with it, but there was evidence to suggest Wallace was... |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 06:22 PM |
#145 |
| -
I think one can objectively conclude from a variety of incidents that |
Zynx |
Jul-02-07 06:50 PM |
#146 |
| -
Despite the mindless parroting you guys like so much... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 01:09 AM |
#153 |
| -
You yourself said he was "pressured" into it. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 12:55 AM |
#150 |
| -
You forgot that Hillary doesn't have Bill's charisma. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 12:50 PM |
#49 |
| -
No candidate does, but you can bet he will be doing a lot of campaigning for her |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jul-02-07 02:55 PM |
#98 |
| -
So? He's not the candidate. She is. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 03:08 PM |
#101 |
| -
Bill Clinton won |
Le Taz Hot |
Jul-03-07 08:59 AM |
#191 |
| -
Slick Willy and hundreds of millions of dollars |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 12:55 PM |
#223 |
| -
Kerry was not "DLC" |
MH1 |
Jul-02-07 12:08 PM |
#47 |
| -
yes he was |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 12:12 PM |
#48 |
| -
Tell that to James Carville... |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 12:53 PM |
#52 |
| -
Don't need to |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 12:55 PM |
#53 |
| -
So why did Carville tell his wife about Kerry's election night strategy? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:17 PM |
#62 |
| -
what does that have to do with Kerry's membership in the DLC? |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 01:24 PM |
#65 |
| -
I never claimed he wasn't a member... |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:52 PM |
#75 |
| -
this is what happens when someone answers for someone else |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 02:11 PM |
#86 |
| -
What I said remains accurate. Kerry is not welcomed by very many in the DLC. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 02:34 PM |
#94 |
| -
you have no proof of that |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 03:08 PM |
#102 |
| -
So I guess Carville's potshots at Dean don't constitute proof? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 03:45 PM |
#110 |
| -
no, Carville is not an elected Democrat or a board member of the DLC |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 03:53 PM |
#111 |
| -
Exactly... |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 04:01 PM |
#113 |
| -
what in the world does this have to do with John Kerry being in the DLC? |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 04:08 PM |
#118 |
| -
I'm simply pointing out the extent of his relationship with the DLC. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 04:25 PM |
#120 |
| -
Facts are stubborn things |
BlueDogDemocratNH |
Jul-02-07 05:59 PM |
#136 |
| -
Carville, From, etc. have made no secret of their contempt for progressive Democrats. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 01:14 AM |
#155 |
| -
Why did Kerry's campaign tell carville? |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-02-07 01:45 PM |
#71 |
| -
Because Kerry thought Carville was a loyal Democrat? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:49 PM |
#74 |
| -
Or maybe |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-02-07 02:10 PM |
#85 |
| -
Do you have any source or evidence indicating that? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 02:40 PM |
#95 |
| -
No, I don't have proof that it wasn't a secret |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-02-07 04:04 PM |
#116 |
| -
Maybe it was a secret, maybe it wasn't. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 05:00 PM |
#124 |
| -
So because Carville disagrees with Howard Dean.... |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-02-07 05:13 PM |
#128 |
| -
Because he said Dean was "incompetent" in 2006 |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 05:50 PM |
#133 |
| -
You're making quite a leap... |
MonkeyFunk |
Jul-02-07 06:04 PM |
#138 |
| -
You're creating a straw man... |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 01:17 AM |
#156 |
| -
"Kerry was DLC" |
BlueDogDemocratNH |
Jul-02-07 05:55 PM |
#135 |
| -
Oh, please! |
Le Taz Hot |
Jul-03-07 09:04 AM |
#192 |
| -
She goes back to the Senate? |
ronnykmarshall |
Jul-02-07 12:56 PM |
#54 |
| -
what about 1992, 1996 |
sabbat hunter |
Jul-02-07 01:01 PM |
#57 |
| -
Yes, Bill Clinton had something called CHARISMA. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:19 PM |
#63 |
| -
a trait which seems absent in MOST politicians. Your point? |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 01:25 PM |
#66 |
| -
It isn't obvious? Politicians with charisma WIN. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 01:59 PM |
#77 |
| -
the DLC recruited Clinton and he ran on their policies |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 02:06 PM |
#83 |
| -
So? He won mainly based on his own charisma. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 02:49 PM |
#97 |
| -
there is no evidence of that. And Perot was not a factor. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 03:22 PM |
#106 |
| -
No evidence of his charisma? How about the name "Slick Willie"? |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 04:04 PM |
#114 |
| -
no, no evidence that that won the election |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 04:06 PM |
#117 |
| -
By that token, there's no evidence pro-DLC policies won the 1992 election. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 04:27 PM |
#121 |
| -
actually, there is |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 04:45 PM |
#122 |
| -
There's no evidence those issues caused Clinton to WIN. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 05:02 PM |
#125 |
| -
of course there is |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 05:16 PM |
#130 |
| -
That's not evidence. That's bullshit. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 05:53 PM |
#134 |
| -
it's bullshit to you because you hate to be wrong |
wyldwolf |
Jul-02-07 06:10 PM |
#141 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-03-07 01:22 AM |
#158 |
| -
nope. Not denyiny Clinton's charisma. But you're denying the effects of his platform |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 05:08 AM |
#181 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-03-07 05:20 AM |
#183 |
| -
because it isn't 1992 anymore. |
wyldwolf |
Jul-03-07 05:45 AM |
#184 |
| -
That is exactly what won Clinton the election |
Ethelk2044 |
Jul-02-07 06:55 PM |
#148 |
| -
Thank you - good to see some common sense in this thread. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 01:24 AM |
#159 |
| -
Exactly, I voted against those 3 for that very reason |
lyonn |
Jul-02-07 02:57 PM |
#99 |
| -
the Democratic candidate will WIN the election |
AtomicKitten |
Jul-02-07 01:42 PM |
#70 |
| -
Agreed. |
Alexander |
Jul-02-07 02:01 PM |
#79 |
| -
Forget it, AK. |
rinsd |
Jul-02-07 02:05 PM |
#82 |
| -
If the Democrat is going to win, no matter WHO we run..... |
ClassWarfare2008 |
Jul-02-07 02:16 PM |
#88 |
| -
My prediction will come true. EOM |
lojasmo |
Jul-02-07 02:20 PM |
#89 |
| -
Personally, I don't worry too much about whether a candidate is DLC |
seasat |
Jul-02-07 02:26 PM |
#91 |
| -
What if the sun doesn't come up tomorrow! |
churchofreality |
Jul-02-07 03:19 PM |
#105 |
| -
That would mean |
ProudDad |
Jul-03-07 01:22 AM |
#157 |
| -
Then we enjoy what President Gore has to offer. |
Alexander |
Jul-03-07 02:29 AM |
#170 |
| -
More Scooter Libbys to pardon. |
sleipnir |
Jul-03-07 08:40 AM |
#189 |
| -
Locking |
The Magistrate |
Jul-03-07 01:01 PM |
#224 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore