You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: OK [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #50
69. OK
I just didn't understand why your attack appeared to be directed at me when all I posted was my assumption that E. Edwards was responding to recent comments from Coulter. (I assumed the comments were new because I didn't hear about them- the "assassination" comments- until the same day that I heard that E. Edwards had called in to "Hardball", and I assumed recent comments were what had inspired her to call in.) I haven't been telling anyone on this board to put their support or donations behind any particular candidate, and I'm still undecided myself (although I do lean towards Edwards at the moment), so I don't believe the "gullible" description you give in your post applies to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Time for DU to show some backbone and contribute to John Edwards. Stand up to the MSM saracat  Jun-27-07 06:54 PM   #0 
  - I agree!  Liberty Belle   Jun-27-07 06:56 PM   #1 
  - No idea what Coulter said, but when Trippi sent me that message...I told myself  The Count   Jun-27-07 06:57 PM   #2 
  - Oh go back and go kiss Obama's ass.  MalloyLiberal   Jun-27-07 06:59 PM   #3 
  - Funny, because I am not an Obama supporter - although on Iraq he is less  The Count   Jun-28-07 06:57 AM   #30 
  - Really? How shallow of you.I assume you would only support standing up to Coulter  saracat   Jun-27-07 07:04 PM   #4 
     - I do that all the time....send Thank You dollars :)  Catchawave   Jun-27-07 08:01 PM   #15 
     - I don't support "standing up to Coulter" by anyone. She has to be ignored, not  The Count   Jun-28-07 06:59 AM   #31 
        - If I remember correctly  last_texas_dem   Jun-28-07 07:13 AM   #38 
           - No, she wasn't. That statement is very old - CPAC old. Since then she's been  The Count   Jun-28-07 07:40 AM   #39 
              - Alright, excuse me  last_texas_dem   Jun-28-07 07:52 AM   #40 
              - She is being kept in the news by these fundraisers. Otherwise, pretty irrelevant  The Count   Jun-28-07 10:22 AM   #50 
                 - Thanks for kicking the thread :)  Catchawave   Jun-28-07 10:28 AM   #52 
                 - It's a money maker Count,  seasonedblue   Jun-28-07 10:30 AM   #54 
                 - OK  last_texas_dem   Jun-29-07 04:58 AM   #69 
              - NO  MonkeyFunk   Jun-28-07 10:42 AM   #62 
  - My first contribution of the year.  onehandle   Jun-27-07 07:14 PM   #5 
  - You have got to be kidding.  AchtungToddler   Jun-27-07 07:24 PM   #6 
  - But you might support the effort to smack her down.Don't you think Edwrds should be thanked somehow?  saracat   Jun-27-07 07:30 PM   #7 
  - How is bringing Coulter back from oblivion comparable with Helen Thomas?  The Count   Jun-28-07 07:02 AM   #34 
  - Then send your $ to the DNC or your favorite candidate.  spooky3   Jun-27-07 07:33 PM   #8 
     - Whaaat? It should be in support of Elizabeth!  saracat   Jun-27-07 07:38 PM   #10 
        - But s/he refuses to send a direct cont to JRE. Wouldn't you prefer  spooky3   Jun-27-07 08:10 PM   #19 
           - Nope.That wasn't my point.She can always donate to the Party. It won't mean the same thing!  saracat   Jun-27-07 09:29 PM   #28 
              - ????? ok, so you would prefer s/he take no action at all?  spooky3   Jun-28-07 09:34 AM   #45 
              - Wow.  IA_Seth   Jun-28-07 11:14 AM   #64 
  - You're not hurting Coulter  StudentsMustUniteNow   Jun-27-07 07:37 PM   #9 
  - It isn't to hurt Coulter.It is to support Elizabeth's stand!  saracat   Jun-27-07 07:39 PM   #11 
  - I Completely Agree With You... I Had To Turn The Crap Off When  ChiciB1   Jun-27-07 07:59 PM   #14 
  - A "stand" dictated by the closing quarter of fundraising rather for anything  The Count   Jun-28-07 07:09 AM   #37 
  - I Saw A Link Once... Don't Know Where Now, But It Was About HOW  ChiciB1   Jun-27-07 08:06 PM   #18 
  - She is a sick, damaged person. Hardly entertaining. She can only be trotted out once in a while.  BleedingHeartPatriot   Jun-27-07 08:29 PM   #22 
  - She certainly got a bit of unexpected attention due to the closing quarter of  The Count   Jun-28-07 07:06 AM   #36 
  - Insulting  maximusveritas   Jun-27-07 07:49 PM   #12 
  - Nothing new? Who else has done it? Name names. And as you are new, perhaps you are unaware  saracat   Jun-27-07 08:27 PM   #21 
     - What's so admirable in resuscitating old outrage for fundraising purposes?  The Count   Jun-28-07 10:27 AM   #51 
  - Coulter is really going to benefit Edwards fundraising efforts,  calteacherguy   Jun-27-07 07:52 PM   #13 
  - Fine. Thanks for sharing your RW talking points ...  Catchawave   Jun-27-07 08:03 PM   #16 
     - You can label them however you wish, but the words are true.  calteacherguy   Jun-27-07 08:04 PM   #17 
     - Yup. I got my anti-Coulter letter BEFORE the Hardball appearance. All planned  The Count   Jun-28-07 10:29 AM   #53 
     - Nicely marched out, though. Each word parsed for its left-o-meter rating.  BleedingHeartPatriot   Jun-27-07 08:41 PM   #23 
  - Why should I have to pay for someone to take a stand?  burythehatchet   Jun-27-07 08:19 PM   #20 
  - She took a stand when no one else has. No gentle chiding. this was a strong request to elevate the  BleedingHeartPatriot   Jun-27-07 08:51 PM   #24 
  - I see it as contributing to someone who demonstrates leadership  AnotherMother4Peace   Jun-27-07 08:52 PM   #25 
  - Elizabeth did NOT bring us down,She elevated us by taking a stand.  saracat   Jun-27-07 09:28 PM   #27 
  - Exactly right, and she put Coulter in the position of trying  spooky3   Jun-28-07 09:39 AM   #47 
  - Because the stand was taken for fundraising purposes. Coulter hasn't said  The Count   Jun-28-07 07:00 AM   #32 
  - K&R - I'm contributing to a couple (John & Elizabeth) who demonstrate compassion & leadership  AnotherMother4Peace   Jun-27-07 08:59 PM   #26 
  - i contributed before the AC debacle  AZDemDist6   Jun-27-07 09:52 PM   #29 
  - Sorry, we're standing up to the media by donating to Kucinich  Tesha   Jun-28-07 07:01 AM   #33 
  - Yup. That's a worthier, more relevant way to do it. Especially as DK hasn't  The Count   Jun-28-07 07:04 AM   #35 
  - Are you confused about the sequence of events, or are you accusing  spooky3   Jun-28-07 09:37 AM   #46 
     - I am not confused. My Trippi letter came BEFORE the Hardball appearance.  The Count   Jun-28-07 10:31 AM   #55 
        - lol, I didn't realize they sent out the emails before Hardball.  seasonedblue   Jun-28-07 10:33 AM   #56 
  - Yep, really standing up. Someone who LOVES fox News!!  MalloyLiberal   Jun-28-07 09:02 AM   #42 
     - What the **ck are you talking about?  Tesha   Jun-28-07 09:12 AM   #43 
        - Kucinich has been defending Fox News.  MalloyLiberal   Jun-28-07 09:43 AM   #48 
           - Citation? (NT)  Tesha   Jun-28-07 10:02 AM   #49 
              - I think he called the other dem candidates out for not  Catchawave   Jun-28-07 10:35 AM   #58 
                 - That's hardly "being a supported of Fox news", sorry. (NT)  Tesha   Jun-28-07 10:40 AM   #61 
  - Just did  mohc   Jun-28-07 08:00 AM   #41 
  - Uh, no. How about another choice?nt  sampsonblk   Jun-28-07 09:13 AM   #44 
  - No, it's Edwards or you are an invertebrate. And a traitor and a bad, bad person.  The Count   Jun-28-07 10:34 AM   #57 
  - Do you mean you didn't?  IA_Seth   Jun-28-07 10:40 AM   #60 
     - I think you're looking for P.O. ("Politicky Operative"?) Gives a new meaning  The Count   Jun-28-07 12:45 PM   #66 
  - Ok, how about Clinton, Obama, Richardson, Dodd, Biden, Kucinich or Gravel?  Moochy   Jun-28-07 11:11 PM   #68 
  - No thanks!  IA_Seth   Jun-28-07 10:38 AM   #59 
  - Talk about grandstanding!  Major Hogwash   Jun-28-07 10:43 AM   #63 
  - Hogwash?  Moochy   Jun-28-07 11:10 PM   #67 
     - Not that it matters to you, but anyone who spends $400 on a haircut, then asks for money  Major Hogwash   Jun-29-07 07:48 AM   #70 
        - Boy if that's how you pick your president?  Moochy   Jun-29-07 09:30 AM   #73 
           - Yeah, well, I don't smoke funny cigarettes either.  Major Hogwash   Jun-29-07 11:59 AM   #74 
  - Done! I contributed to Edwards and Gore. But who is the stupid asshole who contributed to Biden??n/t  IanDB1   Jun-28-07 11:25 AM   #65 
  - Edwards isn't exactly a lone soldier in this fight with the MSM  ripple   Jun-29-07 07:56 AM   #71 
  - I'm confused  abburdlen   Jun-29-07 08:18 AM   #72 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC