You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: I do [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
48. I do
w/the exception of my Rep and my Dem senator that voted NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Anybody else think it's the damn Dems vote on Iraq funding acmavm  May-30-07 12:34 PM   #0 
  - it's no surprise to many of us....  mike_c   May-30-07 12:38 PM   #1 
  - Not what I asked Mike. I asked if it wasn't the cowardly actions  acmavm   May-30-07 12:40 PM   #3 
     - I dunno-- my point is that the "real plans" were never hidden in the first place....  mike_c   May-30-07 12:55 PM   #10 
  - No.  mzmolly   May-30-07 12:40 PM   #2 
  - Tell that shit to Keith Olbermann and any of the other pundits  acmavm   May-30-07 12:44 PM   #4 
  - Tell that "shit" to Al Gore who REALLY understands what "the Dems did"  mzmolly   May-30-07 03:46 PM   #15 
     - Whatever. You must enjoy losing.  acmavm   May-30-07 03:54 PM   #21 
     - Bush said there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.  mzmolly   May-30-07 04:04 PM   #29 
     - The Al Gore who would have voted NO on the funding?  Pastiche423   May-30-07 08:38 PM   #47 
        - Al Gore who would have voted no and understood why we put up a bill to vote on.  mzmolly   May-31-07 12:01 AM   #52 
  - Ugh...how many times must this lie be debunked?  jgraz   May-30-07 12:47 PM   #6 
  - And how many more times does it need to be said  simskl   May-30-07 01:06 PM   #11 
  - Absolute crap  jgraz   May-30-07 01:14 PM   #12 
  - "Bush would have never done that,..."  mzmolly   May-30-07 03:48 PM   #17 
  - Easier to see the sky without all that tinfoil  jgraz   May-30-07 03:55 PM   #23 
     - We have to have Republicans on board and they wanted to see how the "surge"  mzmolly   May-30-07 04:03 PM   #26 
     - No, we don't need Republicans on board  jgraz   May-30-07 04:17 PM   #33 
        - Republicans are not irrelevant if we are to override a veto.  mzmolly   May-30-07 04:19 PM   #34 
           - Do you have even a basic understanding how the federal government works?  jgraz   May-30-07 04:36 PM   #37 
              - What you posted does not change the facts I have laid out.  mzmolly   May-30-07 06:00 PM   #41 
                 - Somebody else help her out here -- I'm done  jgraz   May-30-07 08:14 PM   #45 
                    - See ya.  mzmolly   May-30-07 11:58 PM   #51 
                    - You're not only done, you're wrong  onenote   May-31-07 06:17 AM   #59 
                    - Oh great, someone else who can't handle subtlety  jgraz   May-31-07 11:55 AM   #63 
                    - So long n/t  simskl   May-31-07 08:10 AM   #61 
     - In the real world  azurnoir   May-30-07 10:34 PM   #49 
  - I call absolute bullshit on this  simskl   May-31-07 08:08 AM   #60 
     - Speculation, at best  jgraz   May-31-07 12:09 PM   #65 
        - Of course it's speculation  simskl   May-31-07 05:12 PM   #72 
           - I said "at best"  jgraz   May-31-07 06:47 PM   #73 
  - That's an easy enough problem to solve.  jmp   May-30-07 01:18 PM   #13 
  - Sounds nice in theory, but it's a ridiculous notion.  mzmolly   May-30-07 03:50 PM   #18 
  - That is such a pitiful argument. All that would have had to happen  acmavm   May-30-07 02:45 PM   #14 
     - Ah, yes the old "point out stuff" idea.  mzmolly   May-30-07 03:51 PM   #19 
        - The same people owned the media last November. When we sent these  acmavm   May-30-07 03:55 PM   #22 
           - No, because the media loves drama/ratings.  mzmolly   May-30-07 04:01 PM   #24 
              - Whoa. Well if I've ever heard a good reason to shit on everyone who  acmavm   May-30-07 04:02 PM   #25 
                 - Sorry only 13% of the American public supports pulling funds. Democrats  mzmolly   May-30-07 04:04 PM   #27 
                    - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   May-30-07 04:07 PM   #30 
                    - For the last time, and I do mean the last time, there was no way that  acmavm   May-30-07 04:34 PM   #36 
                       - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   May-30-07 04:40 PM   #38 
                       - This equivocation makes no sense.  mzmolly   May-30-07 06:01 PM   #42 
  - And you trust that Bush would have done the right thing with a lack of funds?  mzmolly   May-30-07 03:48 PM   #16 
  - OK, you've changed the subject now -- I assume you cede my first point  jgraz   May-30-07 04:04 PM   #28 
     - Sorry it's the same subject.  mzmolly   May-30-07 04:14 PM   #31 
        - You're not debating in good faith any longer.  jgraz   May-30-07 04:33 PM   #35 
           - The poll you posted proves my point.  mzmolly   May-30-07 05:57 PM   #40 
              - Congratulations - you can match numbers!  jgraz   May-30-07 08:09 PM   #44 
                 - Why should I add 13 and 69? The 13% figure is what's relevant to the point.  mzmolly   May-30-07 11:58 PM   #50 
  - thanks for the repetition, I hope that someday SOON it will sink in  truedelphi   May-30-07 04:46 PM   #39 
     - And the troops could have died "because of the Democrats."  mzmolly   May-30-07 06:03 PM   #43 
        - Nope the Dems could show some balls for a change  truedelphi   Jun-01-07 12:32 AM   #74 
  - Factually incorrect  sampsonblk   May-30-07 08:31 PM   #46 
  - Which "fact" is incorrect?  mzmolly   May-31-07 12:02 AM   #53 
     - Easy  sampsonblk   May-31-07 12:33 AM   #55 
        - We could have done nothing, but we did what the majority of Americans wanted.  mzmolly   May-31-07 12:40 AM   #56 
           - Nothing but low-quality spin, but thanks anyway  sampsonblk   May-31-07 11:36 AM   #62 
  - Then why tell the Administration a month in advance that the troops would get the money  Toots   Jun-01-07 08:00 AM   #75 
  - We all know that no matter what any one says or does  zalinda   May-30-07 12:46 PM   #5 
  - I agree with acmavm on this one....  Totally Committed   May-30-07 12:49 PM   #7 
  - Kinda OLD nooz i  azurnoir   May-30-07 12:50 PM   #8 
  - bush's statement is a sign of weakness  doggyboy   May-30-07 12:53 PM   #9 
  - Yes, the Rape-Publicans waited for the Dems' permission...  ClassWarrior   May-30-07 03:54 PM   #20 
  - LOL  mzmolly   May-30-07 04:15 PM   #32 
  - I do  Pastiche423   May-30-07 08:41 PM   #48 
  - everyone in DC (pretty much) is on the same side  leftofthedial   May-31-07 12:32 AM   #54 
  - Yes  unlawflcombatnt   May-31-07 03:04 AM   #57 
  - The Dems have always been crystal clear  AtomicKitten   May-31-07 03:12 AM   #58 
  - How does Reid's statement to send an even tougher bill after the veto fit in here?  jgraz   May-31-07 12:01 PM   #64 
     - perhaps to taunt the netroots?  AtomicKitten   May-31-07 12:16 PM   #66 
        - I think the acquiescence to the Rethug framing is what bugs me the most  jgraz   May-31-07 02:17 PM   #67 
           - the most effective opposition  AtomicKitten   May-31-07 02:35 PM   #68 
              - No argument there  jgraz   May-31-07 02:49 PM   #70 
                 - :)  AtomicKitten   May-31-07 02:56 PM   #71 
  - I don't think it's connected to the Dems' vote--I think it's a pre-emptive  wienerdoggie   May-31-07 02:43 PM   #69 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC