You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #22: really? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

AtomicKitten

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-16-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #21

22. really?

" afraid, ashamed ... "safe bet to speculate there are highly objectionable things in them.""

... a subjective critique with ZERO objective findings as of yet; so very DU.

I have posted Rangel's bullet points in the negotiations upthread. They seem pretty reasonable to me.

I believe the Democrats that negotiated this are entitled to the benefit of the doubt until the details are released, but you go right on ahead and pillory them presumptuously, prematurely, and contemptuously if you like.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.