You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: I fervently wish they would give up the pork involved and send the bill w/only the timelines. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. I fervently wish they would give up the pork involved and send the bill w/only the timelines.
It would be giving the funds and including a plan to end the war that most people want. What would he do then? Would he have the nuggets to veto that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Pelosi, Reid both say no to White House meeting on legislation to fund troops Flabbergasted  Apr-11-07 07:40 PM   #0 
  - excellent...push back  ixion   Apr-11-07 07:42 PM   #1 
  - I wonder if he is throwing a temper tantrum right at this moment....  MadMaddie   Apr-11-07 07:47 PM   #2 
  - He's probably already in his jammies and in bed. They'll wait til morning to tell him probably. nt  cyberpj   Apr-11-07 07:50 PM   #4 
  - I fervently wish they would give up the pork involved and send the bill w/only the timelines.  cyberpj   Apr-11-07 07:49 PM   #3 
  - Putting Congressional Approval for Iranian military strike is also reasonable.  Flabbergasted   Apr-11-07 07:51 PM   #5 
  - Didn't they drop that one some time ago? Not that they should have. I wasn't clear on why. nt  cyberpj   Apr-11-07 10:33 PM   #12 
     - Blue Dogs wouldn't vote for it.  Flabbergasted   Apr-11-07 10:58 PM   #14 
  - I agree and leave the time table....because then they push  MadMaddie   Apr-11-07 07:51 PM   #6 
  - Great idea. He must be really worried. But the pork put the Blue Dogs on Board.  Flabbergasted   Apr-11-07 07:55 PM   #8 
  - New Orleans funding is not pork, but the GOP says it is. (nt)  w4rma   Apr-11-07 07:54 PM   #7 
  - I would rather send  BayCityProgressive   Apr-11-07 08:06 PM   #9 
  - They should come up with another bill that specifically  MadMaddie   Apr-11-07 08:08 PM   #10 
     - Now that's an idea!  Flabbergasted   Apr-11-07 09:23 PM   #11 
  - The problem is NOT the "pork"  butlerd   Apr-11-07 11:11 PM   #15 
     - I understand that. It's just that I'd want to see him veto the bill if it weren't there. nt  cyberpj   Apr-12-07 11:24 AM   #16 
  - I think it's wonderful that they're working together on this  Morgana LaFey   Apr-11-07 10:42 PM   #13 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC