You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: This is odd . . . from the "Moving the Piggy Bank" article [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. This is odd . . . from the "Moving the Piggy Bank" article

"During the Clinton years, the Democrats made a crucial breakthrough by adding California and the other Pacific states to their traditional Northeastern and Midwestern base, but important plums such as Texas and Georgia have virtually been ceded to the GOP."

Clinton won Georgia his first time out, lost it the second time but not by a wide margin, if I recall correctly.

Ceding Georgia to the GOP is foolish. Georgia is a state that's been experiencing a large influx of people from other states for years, both because there are jobs here and because many from colder climates retire here, viewing it as the "new Florida" because it's less crowded once you get beyond the Atlanta suburbs, we actually have four seasons here, though we haven't had snow in several years (An Inconvenient Truth) we still have beautiful seasons, we have less crime (or that's the perception) than Florida. It's probably more accurate to say that there are more parts of Georgia with low crime rates than there are parts of Florida with low crime rates.

Many of those who move here are Republicans but that could change, may be changing already. We have lots of immigrants, from many countries, and immigrants are usually Democrats.

When Georgia went to computer voting in 2002, despite having gone GOP in Clinton's second run and for Bush, we had a Democratic governor, Roy Barnes, who was being talked about for the vice-presidency or presidency in the future, and two Democratic senators, Max Cleland being the one up for re-election that year. They were ahead in the polls election night and ahead in the exit polls but magically lost, as did Cynthia McKinney. The GOP had spent a shitload of money here, brought Bush in many times, Cheney, Poppy, and Laura two or three times as well, mostly to campaign for Saxby Shameless.

We need to go back to hand-counted paper ballots in every preceinct of every state. I don't know if we can ever stop what's been happening without that but it seems to be a mostly forgotten issue, with everyone focusing on who the nominee should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC