You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #76: Funny how you attack me instead of the reporters you can't refute. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. Funny how you attack me instead of the reporters you can't refute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Hillary supporter Hilary Rosen belittles Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, and Dems on SFRC on MSNBC Tucker beachmom  Apr-07-07 09:53 PM   #0 
  - Hilary Rosen, Ex-head of the RIAA, is that who you mean?  habitual   Apr-07-07 09:58 PM   #1 
  - Yes, that's her  Ignacio Upton   Apr-07-07 10:11 PM   #4 
  - It's like Greffen supporting Obama - you don't want him interviewed - as to the  papau   Apr-07-07 10:29 PM   #8 
     - Not to get catty here, but since Hillary attacked Geffen, well then:  beachmom   Apr-07-07 10:35 PM   #9 
        - :-) no problem as to catty - and of course Obama was on the right side on this n/t  papau   Apr-08-07 10:19 PM   #19 
  - Gee, what was that about teaching Dems to fight back  TayTay   Apr-07-07 10:00 PM   #2 
  - Rosen the Clintonista - oh, yes, agree with conservatives and trianglulate  illinoisprogressive   Apr-07-07 10:01 PM   #3 
  - I wonder why Bill was so eager to sign the DMCA  Ignacio Upton   Apr-07-07 10:11 PM   #5 
  - Ah! I didn't think about that  fujiyama   Apr-09-07 06:29 PM   #87 
  - Excellent summary  JNelson6563   Apr-09-07 09:16 AM   #26 
  - I missed Tucker's introduction of Rosen, so when I heard what she said, I thought she was GOP  IndianaGreen   Apr-07-07 10:12 PM   #6 
  - notice you usually don't know whether the "Dem" pundit is a Dem  JI7   Apr-08-07 08:52 PM   #16 
  - Hilary Rosen is disgusting  karynnj   Apr-07-07 10:15 PM   #7 
  - She disgusted me. I couldn't believe my ears.  fooj   Apr-07-07 10:54 PM   #10 
  - here Rosen stuck up for John Kerry  AtomicKitten   Apr-07-07 11:03 PM   #11 
  - Because those pundits have audiences and we're working to change those pundits  w4rma   Apr-07-07 11:11 PM   #12 
  - And the TELEVISED PUNDIT should stick to the staements released by DNC and Dean  blm   Apr-09-07 08:54 AM   #20 
  - That was from October 2004 in the heat of an election only weeks  beachmom   Apr-08-07 07:21 PM   #14 
     - I do understand your dismay.  AtomicKitten   Apr-08-07 09:21 PM   #17 
  - Back Away from the TV. Do NOT watch Tucker Carlson. There's no point to it.  Demoiselle   Apr-07-07 11:22 PM   #13 
  - Great post, beachmom. We definitely need new spokespeople, and I'll  babylonsister   Apr-08-07 07:33 PM   #15 
  - We need to appeal to Dean. We need people to back up the DNC when it issues  blm   Apr-09-07 10:20 AM   #35 
  - So what are you saying? That it's Clinton's fault cuz a supporter of hers dissed Kerry & Pelosi?  mtnsnake   Apr-08-07 09:56 PM   #18 
  - This is only latest in a pattern. Here's historian Douglas Brinkley from April 2004:  blm   Apr-09-07 08:59 AM   #21 
  - Of for crying out loud I should've known better than to ask!  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 09:08 AM   #22 
  - Did he make it up? Did Greider make up his observations about Hillary2008 in 2003?  blm   Apr-09-07 09:58 AM   #28 
  - People aren't going to hate Bill Clinton just because you want them to.  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 10:19 AM   #34 
     - The point isn't to hate Clinton - it's to note that he's too friendly with Poppy Bush  blm   Apr-09-07 10:22 AM   #37 
        - So your constant anti-Clinton rhetoric & inneuendo is to get people to like the Clintons? lol  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 10:28 AM   #39 
           - No.. I want them to notice Clinton made a huge mistake in letting Bush off the hook  blm   Apr-09-07 11:37 AM   #53 
              - Then why dont you start stating it that way instead of painting the Clintons as near criminals  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 11:49 AM   #56 
                 - I have called every situation as it deserves.  blm   Apr-09-07 11:58 AM   #57 
  - There is a big difference between stabbing a fellow Dem in the back,  beachmom   Apr-09-07 01:26 PM   #67 
  - Very instructive--Brinkley's remark about the two different Democratic parties.  flpoljunkie   Apr-09-07 09:09 AM   #23 
     - Instructive? Try divisive.  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 09:11 AM   #24 
     - You are angry that it is posted, but not disturbed in a historian's observations  blm   Apr-09-07 09:55 AM   #27 
        - Clintons aren't the ones being divisive here.  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 10:06 AM   #29 
           - Hillary? Goddess of Peace?  Nedsdag   Apr-09-07 10:17 AM   #32 
              - Joke? Heck no!  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 10:58 AM   #43 
                 - Okaaaaaaay!  Nedsdag   Apr-09-07 01:01 PM   #64 
                 - or Diana, the the moon goddess, the huntress -  karynnj   Apr-09-07 10:11 PM   #90 
                    - "the moon goddess"  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 11:52 PM   #91 
     - Long before Brinkley said this, I heard that it was the Clinton Dems vs Kennedy Dems  blm   Apr-09-07 09:12 AM   #25 
        - Yeah & I heard if Kerry had his way it would've been Kerry/McCain vs Bush/Cheney  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 10:10 AM   #31 
           - Damn that Tom Daschle for trying to get McCain to switch parties in 2001.  blm   Apr-09-07 10:17 AM   #33 
              - Nice try at attempting to put your rhetoric in my mouth  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 10:26 AM   #38 
              - Is this the only thing you have to bring to a debate, mtnsnake?  Kerry2008   Apr-09-07 10:41 AM   #41 
                 - Maybe you should worry about the lies hurled at the Clintons  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 10:51 AM   #42 
                    - Pundits repeating a RW rumor - gee, now that's reliable.  blm   Apr-09-07 11:03 AM   #44 
                    - In that post, I wasn't talking about you in particular  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 11:07 AM   #46 
                    - You know I stand against the lies spewed towards Hillary.  Kerry2008   Apr-09-07 11:04 AM   #45 
                    - Instead of accusing me of lying, something I've never done, accuse the authors  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 11:11 AM   #47 
                       - Those same sources repeated the lie that Clintons trashed the WH, but that doesn't make it true.  blm   Apr-09-07 11:19 AM   #48 
                       - and just because things are often repeated about the Clintons here, it doesn't make it true either.  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 11:21 AM   #49 
                          - Big difference. Rove's lies against Clinton don't deserve repeating. Facts from real journalists  blm   Apr-09-07 11:32 AM   #52 
                             - I'm the one who wants voices of honesty shut down??  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 11:44 AM   #55 
                       - If you believe lies, that's your own error of judgment.  Kerry2008   Apr-09-07 11:23 AM   #50 
                          - That's where you're wrong..  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 11:42 AM   #54 
                             - Court is wrong. Kerry considered it possible back in 2001 IF McCain switched to Dem party.  blm   Apr-09-07 12:04 PM   #58 
                                - It was also widely speculated upon in 2004 by Democrats as well as Republicans  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 12:10 PM   #59 
                                   - Nope, I can't change speculation. You also can't make it the truth, so stop spewing it. n/t  Kerry2008   Apr-09-07 12:15 PM   #60 
                                   - Read posts 69 and 75 and then get back to me. nt  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 03:33 PM   #82 
                                   - And speculation among some who heard RW talking points deserves repeating now?  blm   Apr-09-07 12:19 PM   #61 
                                      - ...and selective criticism is also "a standard peculiar to few here at DU" nt  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 12:28 PM   #63 
                    - Here is what Kerry said last week which I hope will put this to rest:  beachmom   Apr-09-07 01:40 PM   #69 
                       - The timeframe was when McCain was 'thinking' about switching which was in 2001.  blm   Apr-09-07 02:01 PM   #74 
                       - No, it was '04 that he was talking about. Here was Tavis's first question:  beachmom   Apr-09-07 02:05 PM   #75 
                          - the timeframe is never established beyond when Mccain was thinking about switching parties, and  blm   Apr-09-07 02:44 PM   #77 
                             - No sense trying to re-write history anymore, blm.  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 03:15 PM   #79 
                             - No, on MYDD when Kerry came out with the bombshell that  beachmom   Apr-09-07 06:21 PM   #86 
                                - The two stories do intersect - I understand how you make your conclusion, but I still read it  blm   Apr-09-07 07:05 PM   #88 
                       - Thank you beachmom. That backs up everything I've been saying.  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 03:08 PM   #78 
              - Um, BLM -- did you watch Tavis Smiley?  beachmom   Apr-09-07 01:31 PM   #68 
                 - don't get why this is a big deal, really  AtomicKitten   Apr-09-07 03:43 PM   #83 
  - I don't know -- what do you think? Geffen was merely an Obama  beachmom   Apr-09-07 01:19 PM   #66 
     - Granted, what's good for the goose is good ofr the gander  mtnsnake   Apr-09-07 03:20 PM   #81 
  - guilt by association?  paulk   Apr-09-07 10:10 AM   #30 
  - So, Rosen was right to criticize Pelosi (and Kerry).  Mass   Apr-09-07 10:21 AM   #36 
  - "Hillary supporter Hilary Rosen "  paulk   Apr-09-07 10:37 AM   #40 
     - She is a Hillary supporter and is frequently introduced that way on Tucker  beachmom   Apr-09-07 01:50 PM   #71 
        - she was not introduced as a "Hillary supporter" on this particular  paulk   Apr-09-07 05:25 PM   #84 
           - Thanks for the link, paulk. Very interesting indeed.  beachmom   Apr-09-07 06:14 PM   #85 
  - Well - when I look in the mirror, what I don't see is a 'coincidence theorist'  blm   Apr-09-07 11:24 AM   #51 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-09-07 01:08 PM   #65 
        - Because you only know my posts from AFTER I read Clinton's book and have no clue  blm   Apr-09-07 01:47 PM   #70 
        - your "interesting" way of assimilating information and forming an opinion  AtomicKitten   Apr-09-07 01:54 PM   #73 
           - Funny how you attack me instead of the reporters you can't refute.  blm   Apr-09-07 02:06 PM   #76 
              - you're not interested in refutation  AtomicKitten   Apr-09-07 03:17 PM   #80 
        - I see people like you  zidzi   Apr-09-07 07:22 PM   #89 
  - With friends like this, we don't need enemies  Jack Rabbit   Apr-09-07 12:20 PM   #62 
  - This goes to the heart of the matter  karynnj   Apr-10-07 08:02 AM   #95 
  - Criticizing Pelosi, there's the giveaway.  Canuckistanian   Apr-09-07 01:51 PM   #72 
  - So the US Navy didn't give Kerry his medals - he gave them to himself? WOW!  Major Hogwash   Apr-10-07 12:48 AM   #92 
  - Ms. Rosen's comments will be used against Kerry during his re-election next year.  Major Hogwash   Apr-10-07 02:37 AM   #93 
     - Exactly -  karynnj   Apr-10-07 07:53 AM   #94 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC