You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #52: I'm wondering if Bloomberg might jump in out of sheer boredom. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. I'm wondering if Bloomberg might jump in out of sheer boredom.
He's got more money than he can count and nothing to do.

Agree with you on Fred Thompson. I'm just not seeing the "Fred Thompson scenario" yet. I'm not stomping my feet and insisting that he's out, but it just feels as if he's out. For now anyway.

Re Gore, here is this piece from today's :

_ _ _ _ _

Dan Gerstein: "According to a well-connected Democratic operative, Team Hillary is less threatened by Obama than by the possible entry of Al Gore into the race. That's the real reason why the putative frontrunner's strategy has been geared toward bulldozing the field early on -- to scare Gore off. And that's why, under this theory, Obama's early money might is so problematic for Hillary. The more strength Obama shows, the weaker she looks. And the muddier the race gets, the more inviting it is to Gore."
_ _ _ _ _

It's going to be a wild one, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -One of these 24 people will be our next president. Old Crusoe  Apr-01-07 01:35 AM   #0 
  - I would say one of these four,  AshevilleGuy   Apr-01-07 03:40 AM   #1 
  - An interesting bunch demographically -- three Southerners and one  Old Crusoe   Apr-01-07 11:45 AM   #4 
  - I'd add Obama, but I agree with your list.  Bluedogvoter   Apr-01-07 11:51 AM   #6 
  - Don't underestimate Romney. He is gathering the backing of  cadmium   Apr-01-07 06:33 PM   #14 
  - I understand, but I don't think he will be their nominee.  AshevilleGuy   Apr-01-07 06:37 PM   #15 
  - Whatever dynamic could overcome Rudy's negatives would be  cadmium   Apr-01-07 06:47 PM   #16 
     - I don't think the swing voters will worry about Rudy's negatives.  AshevilleGuy   Apr-01-07 06:52 PM   #17 
        - The media intimates that the Republican  cadmium   Apr-01-07 07:15 PM   #19 
        - Right. They are not weak.  AshevilleGuy   Apr-01-07 07:36 PM   #25 
           - I still say watch out for Romney  cadmium   Apr-02-07 01:13 PM   #29 
              - Well, I would rather we run against Mitt any day than Rudy.  AshevilleGuy   Apr-02-07 03:23 PM   #32 
                 - I dont think that is how they are thinking now.  cadmium   Apr-02-07 07:33 PM   #36 
        - A Democratic Consultant whose name  OHdem10   Apr-05-07 10:30 AM   #49 
  - I agree--the BFEE is behind him. He is malleable/empty suit material--  wienerdoggie   Apr-01-07 07:23 PM   #21 
  - I think you've left out the three front-runners.  Donald Ian Rankin   Apr-02-07 03:50 PM   #34 
  - I chose my four deliberately.  AshevilleGuy   Apr-03-07 01:59 AM   #41 
  - God, I hope not.  Clark2008   Apr-05-07 11:07 AM   #50 
  - Obsessed. n/t  AshevilleGuy   Apr-05-07 07:35 PM   # 
  - Delete. It doubled up.  AshevilleGuy   Apr-05-07 07:35 PM   #53 
  - Only way Fred Thompson will be president is if he plays one on TV  LynneSin   Apr-06-07 08:08 AM   #56 
  - In order of probability,  CK_John   Apr-01-07 10:40 AM   #2 
  - A prime example of "underestimating opponents" is in post 1  wyldwolf   Apr-01-07 10:46 AM   #3 
  - I'd put Obama on that list before I'd put Hillary. Clintons have been too cozy with Bush  mnhtnbb   Apr-01-07 12:07 PM   #7 
  - ... uh... so?  wyldwolf   Apr-01-07 01:01 PM   #8 
  - My reasoning for that omission can be summed in one phrase:  AshevilleGuy   Apr-01-07 06:02 PM   #11 
     - I think they're on their way down...  weezy2736   Apr-02-07 09:39 AM   #28 
        - ??? Don't understand that.  AshevilleGuy   Apr-02-07 03:25 PM   #33 
           - Yes, but  weezy2736   Apr-02-07 07:44 PM   #37 
  - Hi, CK_John. I think the chance is fair of Sam Brownback not getting the  Old Crusoe   Apr-01-07 11:49 AM   #5 
     - I think Brownback will have enough of his excellent adventure  wienerdoggie   Apr-01-07 06:26 PM   #13 
        - On one hand I'd love to see Brownback just resign his seat and crawl  Old Crusoe   Apr-01-07 07:03 PM   #18 
           - I can't wait for the 'Thug primary--"I'M more conservative!" "No! I am!"  wienerdoggie   Apr-01-07 07:16 PM   #20 
              - I believe you are correct about Sam Brownback -- he is a  Old Crusoe   Apr-01-07 07:23 PM   #23 
  - Each of us will winnow the list in our own minds to say, 12 , or 6, or  Old Crusoe   Apr-01-07 02:01 PM   #9 
  - My picks, and reasons for elimination.  TheWraith   Apr-01-07 03:00 PM   #10 
  - Wow--excellent reasoning, but I can't see Brownback and Gingrich  wienerdoggie   Apr-01-07 06:20 PM   #12 
     - Not sure about Hagel. He took a stand about 2 weeks ago and  CK_John   Apr-01-07 07:23 PM   #22 
        - You must have missed last week's Sunday show with George  wienerdoggie   Apr-01-07 07:29 PM   #24 
        - If Hagel runs it would be as an Independent.  bklyncowgirl   Apr-02-07 06:08 AM   #26 
           - Agreed--how do you announce a run as a Republican during the same week  wienerdoggie   Apr-02-07 09:28 AM   #27 
  - You left out Lyndon Larouche  Bleachers7   Apr-02-07 01:44 PM   #30 
  - You bet I did!  Old Crusoe   Apr-03-07 12:38 AM   #39 
  - I think Jon Stewart would bring out the youth vote.  tinfoilinfor2005   Apr-02-07 02:47 PM   #31 
  - You forgot Gary Hart!! Shame on you! n/t  Hart2008   Apr-02-07 03:52 PM   #35 
  - Hi, Hart2008. Well, yes, I did. I didn't know there was any talk from  Old Crusoe   Apr-03-07 12:37 AM   #38 
  - Nothing concrete from Gore or Clark either!  Hart2008   Apr-03-07 06:56 AM   #42 
     - I think the weak field is on the red side of the ledger, not the blue.  Old Crusoe   Apr-03-07 11:04 AM   #44 
        - Any candidate who supported the war is weak n/t  Hart2008   Apr-06-07 06:56 AM   #54 
  - As promised, I tried to link to the site but  Old Crusoe   Apr-03-07 01:54 AM   #40 
     - It's a work in progress by volunteers...  Hart2008   Apr-03-07 06:59 AM   #43 
        - I clicked on Hart's site there... yes, he is a Renaissance thinker and  Old Crusoe   Apr-03-07 11:07 AM   #45 
           - The blog is being upgraded with new material.  Hart2008   Apr-05-07 09:48 AM   #47 
              - Sorta kinda, yes. I've saved the sight, Hart2008, and will check in  Old Crusoe   Apr-05-07 07:29 PM   #51 
                 - silent as the Sphinx  Hart2008   Apr-06-07 07:01 AM   #55 
                    - Well, Christ knows we could have used his foreign policy expertise  Old Crusoe   Apr-06-07 01:26 PM   #57 
  - After Iowa, I believe the list will be effectively whittled down to:  Old Crusoe   Apr-03-07 09:33 PM   #46 
     - By the end of January '08, it will be down to Edwards, Obama, Clinton & Romney, Giuliani, Brownback  Czolgosz   Apr-05-07 09:57 AM   #48 
        - I'm wondering if Bloomberg might jump in out of sheer boredom.  Old Crusoe   Apr-05-07 07:32 PM   #52 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC