bvar22
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-27-07 08:08 PM
Original message |
| Don't be surprised if Bush* SIGNS this bill. |
|
This bill gives Bush/Big Corpo everything they want.
The Democrats get to pretend like they are actually doing something to end the WAR.
The Republican Party gets to pretend that they are opposing a bush* administration.
The Global WAR Corporations get $Billions$ more of American Working Class money transfered to their already rich pockets.
* $100Billion$ Dollars to keep the money flowing into the profiteers' pockets courtesy of The Democratic Party
* 18 months to string out the WAR until his term expires. Bush* will have 18 uninterrupted months to keep the killing and looting going as long as he says he is making progress (and he really doesn't have to do that. RE: The Iraq War Resolution). Bush* can easily string out the WAR until he leaves office courtesy of The Democratic Party.
*This bill establishes the precedent for a PERMANENT PRESENCE of US MILITARY in Iraq. This provision codifies the PERMANENT Bases to protect Corporate Commercial interests for the future looting and privatizing of Iraqi national resources. Thank You Democratic Party
*There are NO changes in the actual mission for Military assets currently in Iraq. Wouldn't want to get in the way of the looting of Iraq, the REAL reason for the occupation. Cui Bono?
*Bush gets a great Video Op to pretend like he is listening to Congress without actually giving up ANYTHING.
There is a VERY REAL possibility (likely?) that bush* will sign this bill in spite of the political theater from the White House. It gives him everything he wants, and covers his ass until his term expires. The Democrats will look pretty stupid (like after the IWR) if bush* signs it.
This scenario is WIN/WIN for both Political Parties. The only losers are the American Public, The Iraqi Civilians, and our children who will have to pay the bill for this.
You heard it here first. Feel free to Bookmark this thread, and make me eat this post if Bush* vetoes the bill.
The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR.
|
| -Don't be surprised if Bush* SIGNS this bill. |
bvar22 |
Mar-27-07 08:08 PM |
#0 |
-
And Don't Forget This - The Surge Is Working....... |
global1 |
Mar-27-07 08:11 PM |
#1 |
-
Or signs it, and simply ignores the timeline provisions. |
Ninja Jordan |
Mar-27-07 08:16 PM |
#2 |
 -
Takes the money and runs? |
jaxx |
Mar-27-07 08:20 PM |
#3 |
-
Sure, he'll sign it with a signing statement attached cancelling the withdrawal timeline provision |
youngdem |
Mar-27-07 08:27 PM |
#4 |
 -
Thanks |
job777 |
Mar-28-07 07:35 AM |
#22 |
 -
Very astute |
sampsonblk |
Mar-28-07 08:37 AM |
#23 |
 -
I'm hoping he does that |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-28-07 11:49 AM |
#29 |
-
I've been told its about steps (or something like that) when |
mmonk |
Mar-27-07 08:32 PM |
#5 |
 -
Ooh, a Nader supporter, purist, and traitor? |
DemBones DemBones |
Mar-27-07 08:42 PM |
#6 |
  -
Yeah |
mmonk |
Mar-27-07 08:46 PM |
#8 |
   -
In this context, it appears to mean... |
Everybody |
Mar-28-07 08:42 AM |
#24 |
  -
Don't you just hate being called pure? |
Generator |
Mar-27-07 09:53 PM |
#13 |
 -
Yeah, I saw some of that. |
bvar22 |
Mar-27-07 08:54 PM |
#9 |
-
Hmm, you make some good points |
Canuckistanian |
Mar-27-07 08:43 PM |
#7 |
-
Bush will veto it because it is his nature to be defiant |
whistle |
Mar-27-07 09:34 PM |
#10 |
 -
I don't |
Big Pappa |
Mar-27-07 09:38 PM |
#11 |
 -
That's what should happen, but... |
ToeBot |
Mar-27-07 09:46 PM |
#12 |
-
The weak link for the democrats is Senator Joe Lieberman |
whistle |
Mar-28-07 05:59 AM |
#18 |
-
That would be brillance on Bush's part |
Generator |
Mar-27-07 09:54 PM |
#14 |
 -
Brilliant? Is it really brilliant when you have to bully others to give you what you want? |
shance |
Mar-27-07 11:32 PM |
#16 |
-
Where are you getting this infomation |
Rusty MacHenry |
Mar-27-07 10:37 PM |
#15 |
-
and what bills have you pushed through Congress? |
ComerPerro |
Mar-27-07 11:39 PM |
#17 |
 -
Phony argument alert |
sampsonblk |
Mar-28-07 08:42 AM |
#25 |
-
then you must not know jack about how politics actually works |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 11:10 AM |
#26 |
-
Another phony argument, friend |
sampsonblk |
Mar-28-07 11:45 AM |
#27 |
-
if you do, then you must know that a bill can't pass without compromise when neither side |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 11:47 AM |
#28 |
-
And we don't particularly in the Senate |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-28-07 11:51 AM |
#30 |
 -
not even close to one |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 11:53 AM |
#31 |
-
No third grade civics lesson, please |
sampsonblk |
Mar-28-07 02:49 PM |
#32 |
-
yeah, all or nothing. I mean, why try to help where you can and keep working? |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 04:02 PM |
#36 |
-
Third time's the charm |
sampsonblk |
Mar-28-07 09:32 PM |
#39 |
-
those handouts? Those were happening anyway. At least this is an effort |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 09:44 PM |
#42 |
-
Well thanks |
sampsonblk |
Mar-29-07 07:15 AM |
#45 |
-
Signing statement |
MiniMe |
Mar-28-07 06:51 AM |
#19 |
-
The royal ego/mental illness won't allow him to sign it. nt |
Vinca |
Mar-28-07 06:54 AM |
#20 |
-
I wouldn't bet on it |
onenote |
Mar-28-07 07:03 AM |
#21 |
-
The funny thing is that he won't do it |
Hippo_Tron |
Mar-28-07 02:53 PM |
#33 |
-
If Bush signs this bill the Dems own the war. Repukes are off the hook. |
Sapere aude |
Mar-28-07 03:06 PM |
#34 |
 -
Veto or not, this is bush's war. Trying to put in on the dems |
ncteechur |
Mar-28-07 09:16 PM |
#37 |
 -
Veto or not, this is bush's war. Trying to put in on the dems |
ncteechur |
Mar-28-07 09:16 PM |
#38 |
-
Even if it destroys the Republican Party, Dear Leader will NOT sign this bill. |
ShortnFiery |
Mar-28-07 03:21 PM |
#35 |
-
Whats to keep * from signing the bill and IGNORING THE PULLOUT?!!! |
Countdown_3_2_1 |
Mar-28-07 09:42 PM |
#40 |
-
You give the Dems way too much credit |
tiffane |
Mar-28-07 09:44 PM |
#41 |
-
Very well articulated |
Morgana LaFey |
Mar-28-07 10:13 PM |
#43 |
-
Hungry? |
Flabbergasted |
Mar-28-07 10:35 PM |
#44 |