AshevilleGuy
(947 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-07-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 29. That pesky Constitution, again. |
|
By the time we got such an amendment through, IF we ever did, the new president and VP would be in office. And if we have, by some miracle, Dems in the WH the repukes would use the new amendment against them.
I wish we did have such a parliamentary system, but it would change the whole character of our government and would not fly.
|
| -What's the case AGAINST a presidential recall election? |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 12:30 PM |
#0 |
-
Because amending the Constituion is difficult? |
rinsd |
Mar-07-07 12:31 PM |
#1 |
-
It might cause the president to become preoccupied with a recall instead of doing his/her job. |
Ninja Jordan |
Mar-07-07 12:35 PM |
#2 |
-
Its a bad idea |
bottomofthehill |
Mar-07-07 12:36 PM |
#3 |
-
so how would it work? |
onenote |
Mar-07-07 12:52 PM |
#4 |
-
So you think the recall of Davis for Arnold was a good thing? |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 12:53 PM |
#5 |
 -
No. I'm saying... |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:14 PM |
#8 |
-
A Presidential recall procedure would be anarchy... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 01:16 PM |
#9 |
-
No president would be able to govern? |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:28 PM |
#10 |
-
We can't idiot proof the Presidency... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 01:32 PM |
#13 |
 -
If Bush is removed (resigns), the party remains in power. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:47 PM |
#15 |
-
You are quite naive... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 01:51 PM |
#16 |
-
They are different animals because their constitutions are worded differently. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 02:14 PM |
#19 |
-
There is no push because those with the means to push would not likely support the idea |
Freddie Stubbs |
Mar-07-07 01:58 PM |
#18 |
-
Others in this thread have pointed out why it is a bad idea... |
Sir Jeffrey |
Mar-07-07 01:03 PM |
#6 |
-
As no. 1 implied |
benddem |
Mar-07-07 01:11 PM |
#7 |
-
Oh brother. |
Richardo |
Mar-07-07 01:29 PM |
#11 |
 -
Again, you (like others) imply our government works. n/t |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:31 PM |
#12 |
 -
The Constitution works quite well, actually |
Richardo |
Mar-07-07 01:45 PM |
#14 |
-
I'd never include this President and the Constitution in the same sentence. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:51 PM |
#17 |
-
If you don't have the votes for impeachment and conviction, 67%, ... |
CRH |
Mar-07-07 02:26 PM |
#20 |
 -
rinsd, Freddie Stubbs and CRH |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 02:49 PM |
#22 |
  -
When was the last time the Constitution was amended if its so easy? |
rinsd |
Mar-07-07 03:06 PM |
#24 |
 -
Sorry, rinsd, I was agreeing with you. I misspoke when I said it's viable. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 03:15 PM |
#25 |
 -
Whoops |
rinsd |
Mar-07-07 03:21 PM |
#26 |
 -
You are forgetting about 75% of the states' legislatures as well |
dansolo |
Mar-07-07 06:26 PM |
#32 |
-
Oh god, imagine if it were to happen, the media circus would increase 10 fold. |
EOO |
Mar-07-07 02:43 PM |
#21 |
 -
Good grief. I hope you're the only one who yields to the media. n/t |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 02:57 PM |
#23 |
-
I'm saying it's a bad thing. |
EOO |
Mar-07-07 03:43 PM |
#27 |
-
Scarier than Bush...? Hmmm... Let me think about that one--you've stumped me there. n/t |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 03:46 PM |
#28 |
-
Easy one - Mitt Romney |
EOO |
Mar-07-07 11:30 PM |
#33 |
-
That pesky Constitution, again. |
AshevilleGuy |
Mar-07-07 03:52 PM |
#29 |
-
Our form of democracy is somewhat experimental and |
MGKrebs |
Mar-07-07 04:16 PM |
#30 |
 -
Very true. Sad but true, nonetheless... and remedies are imperative for these reasons. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-08-07 10:38 AM |
#35 |
-
This is a thought experiment...nothing more... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 04:24 PM |
#31 |
-
The Constitution provides for that every 2, 4, and 6 years depending on the office |
Hekate |
Mar-08-07 01:59 AM |
#34 |