Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-07-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 14. The Constitution works quite well, actually |
|
And there's no provision for recall of a President in it.
|
| -What's the case AGAINST a presidential recall election? |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 12:30 PM |
#0 |
 -
Because amending the Constituion is difficult? |
rinsd |
Mar-07-07 12:31 PM |
#1 |
| -
It might cause the president to become preoccupied with a recall instead of doing his/her job. |
Ninja Jordan |
Mar-07-07 12:35 PM |
#2 |
| -
Its a bad idea |
bottomofthehill |
Mar-07-07 12:36 PM |
#3 |
| -
so how would it work? |
onenote |
Mar-07-07 12:52 PM |
#4 |
| -
So you think the recall of Davis for Arnold was a good thing? |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 12:53 PM |
#5 |
  -
No. I'm saying... |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:14 PM |
#8 |
| -
A Presidential recall procedure would be anarchy... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 01:16 PM |
#9 |
| -
No president would be able to govern? |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:28 PM |
#10 |
| -
We can't idiot proof the Presidency... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 01:32 PM |
#13 |
| -
If Bush is removed (resigns), the party remains in power. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:47 PM |
#15 |
| -
You are quite naive... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 01:51 PM |
#16 |
| -
They are different animals because their constitutions are worded differently. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 02:14 PM |
#19 |
| -
There is no push because those with the means to push would not likely support the idea |
Freddie Stubbs |
Mar-07-07 01:58 PM |
#18 |
| -
Others in this thread have pointed out why it is a bad idea... |
Sir Jeffrey |
Mar-07-07 01:03 PM |
#6 |
| -
As no. 1 implied |
benddem |
Mar-07-07 01:11 PM |
#7 |
| -
Oh brother. |
Richardo |
Mar-07-07 01:29 PM |
#11 |
| -
Again, you (like others) imply our government works. n/t |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:31 PM |
#12 |
| -
The Constitution works quite well, actually |
Richardo |
Mar-07-07 01:45 PM |
#14 |
| -
I'd never include this President and the Constitution in the same sentence. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 01:51 PM |
#17 |
| -
If you don't have the votes for impeachment and conviction, 67%, ... |
CRH |
Mar-07-07 02:26 PM |
#20 |
| -
rinsd, Freddie Stubbs and CRH |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 02:49 PM |
#22 |
| -
When was the last time the Constitution was amended if its so easy? |
rinsd |
Mar-07-07 03:06 PM |
#24 |
| -
Sorry, rinsd, I was agreeing with you. I misspoke when I said it's viable. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 03:15 PM |
#25 |
| -
Whoops |
rinsd |
Mar-07-07 03:21 PM |
#26 |
| -
You are forgetting about 75% of the states' legislatures as well |
dansolo |
Mar-07-07 06:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
Oh god, imagine if it were to happen, the media circus would increase 10 fold. |
EOO |
Mar-07-07 02:43 PM |
#21 |
| -
Good grief. I hope you're the only one who yields to the media. n/t |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 02:57 PM |
#23 |
| -
I'm saying it's a bad thing. |
EOO |
Mar-07-07 03:43 PM |
#27 |
| -
Scarier than Bush...? Hmmm... Let me think about that one--you've stumped me there. n/t |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-07-07 03:46 PM |
#28 |
| -
Easy one - Mitt Romney |
EOO |
Mar-07-07 11:30 PM |
#33 |
| -
That pesky Constitution, again. |
AshevilleGuy |
Mar-07-07 03:52 PM |
#29 |
| -
Our form of democracy is somewhat experimental and |
MGKrebs |
Mar-07-07 04:16 PM |
#30 |
| -
Very true. Sad but true, nonetheless... and remedies are imperative for these reasons. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Mar-08-07 10:38 AM |
#35 |
| -
This is a thought experiment...nothing more... |
SaveElmer |
Mar-07-07 04:24 PM |
#31 |
| -
The Constitution provides for that every 2, 4, and 6 years depending on the office |
Hekate |
Mar-08-07 01:59 AM |
#34 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread