You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #10: I believe that you may have a good question ....... [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

FrenchieCat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Mar-01-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9

10. I believe that you may have a good question .......

Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 06:44 PM by FrenchieCat

But you should provide more than a link on that amendment. I remember Bin-Lugar, but don't remember a Durbin amemdment. When was it voted on? A little bit of fleshing out on your part so that we don't have to do the research to figure out exactly what you are saying would be helpful.

Whether Chafee is "bitter", I don't know? :shrug:

What I do know is that Durbin voted Yeah on the IWR, and Chafee voted NO.

How did others vote....
Give a list, like I did. It was work, but worth it in order to provide the information in as clear way as possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

-CHAFEE Raises a Good Point -Why did Dem Sen. who voted FOR IWR, Vote NO for LEVIN and ViseVersa?	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 06:06 PM	#0
- All of those dems supported the war	BayCityProgressive	Mar-01-07 06:12 PM	#1
- Big thanks, FrenchieCat, for your thread. I hope it gets the play here it deserves.	David Zephyr	Mar-01-07 06:12 PM	#2
- Well, I am just asking Chafee's question.....	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 06:14 PM	#3
- It may not since it's a dupe	JNelson6563	Mar-02-07 08:23 AM	#35
- Thanks for pointing that out........	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 12:47 PM	#43
- Better question, perhaps...	Everybody	Mar-01-07 06:17 PM	#4
- Why did Feingold vote against it?	ProSense	Mar-01-07 06:22 PM	#5
- Feingold didn't want to give UN any power over our going to war..and didn't believe any intervention	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 06:29 PM	#6
- No, for the very reason I stated.	ProSense	Mar-01-07 06:50 PM	#11
- Why did those three vote AYE for both ?	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 06:53 PM	#12
- I did address that in my response. n/t	ProSense	Mar-01-07 06:56 PM	#13
- Please see my edited post...entered prior to you reply....	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 07:00 PM	#14
- Power? No one ever said the UN granted POWER	Canuckistanian	Mar-01-07 08:38 PM	#27
- I think that Feingold just doesn't believe in intervention without	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 09:19 PM	#30
- Like last year's invasion of Lebanon?	Canuckistanian	Mar-01-07 09:30 PM	#31
- I agree that "self defense" is Muddled......	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 09:35 PM	#32
- .	Hav	Mar-01-07 06:29 PM	#7
- Similar column last week in the Detroit News	WesDem	Mar-01-07 06:31 PM	#8
- This then looks like a co-ordinated action	karynnj	Mar-02-07 01:40 PM	#46
- The important thing about Levin	WesDem	Mar-02-07 03:13 PM	#50
- I'm as confused as you	karynnj	Mar-02-07 03:57 PM	#52
- If Bush decided to go unilaterally, after the UN	WesDem	Mar-02-07 04:03 PM	#53
- The problem would have been that it was more ambiguous	karynnj	Mar-03-07 01:26 PM	#65
- Durbin makes clear the difference between Lieberman's IWR and his own, the Levin here.....	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 08:27 PM	#61
- I meant Levin made it clear....not Durbin! n/t	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 10:29 PM	#62
- Delete - I see your other response.	karynnj	Mar-03-07 01:16 PM	#64
- So, why did Chafee vote against the Durbin amendment that would have limited	Mass	Mar-01-07 06:38 PM	#9
- I believe that you may have a good question .......	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 06:44 PM	#10
- Durbin voted NO on the IWR.	Mass	Mar-01-07 07:00 PM	#15
- So can you give us a short sypnopsis on the Durbin amendment?	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 07:11 PM	#16
- Here is the synopsis of the Durbin amendment.	Mass	Mar-01-07 07:18 PM	#17
- Did the others require a second vote by Congress?	WesDem	Mar-01-07 07:21 PM	#18
- None of these votes (including Levin) required a second vote by Congress.	Mass	Mar-01-07 07:24 PM	#20
- Those voting YEAH on 2nd Byrd amendment....	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 07:52 PM	#25
- According to EPIC	WesDem	Mar-01-07 08:56 PM	#28
- According to Carl Levin	WesDem	Mar-02-07 03:08 PM	#49
- The way I read this, the Levin ammendment would not have required Congressional authorizaion	Clarkie1	Mar-01-07 07:30 PM	#21
- Upon closer reading, this is not the case.	Clarkie1	Mar-02-07 12:42 AM	#34
- The UN did pass a resolution unanimously	karynnj	Mar-02-07 12:21 PM	#42
- Probably because the Durbin admendment was done the day before.....	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 07:43 PM	#22
- As I read Levin, it would not have slowed the road to war.	Mass	Mar-01-07 07:48 PM	#24
- How do you read the Levin amendment?	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 08:03 PM	#26
- I think you are right...nt.	Clarkie1	Mar-02-07 12:38 AM	#33
- Durbin Amendment, Oct 10th, 2002	TayTay	Mar-02-07 12:06 PM	#41
- Do you have a link to that text, TayTay?	WesDem	Mar-02-07 03:15 PM	#51
- Not directly, due to the weirdness that is THOMAS	TayTay	Mar-02-07 07:19 PM	#59
- Wellstone: A man of conscience.	AtomicKitten	Mar-01-07 07:23 PM	#19
- Hero is the word!	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 07:44 PM	#23
- Levin Amendment on Iraq	FrenchieCat	Mar-01-07 09:01 PM	#29
- K&R - important points...n/t	ms liberty	Mar-02-07 08:27 AM	#36
- Because Bush was popular at the time, because an election was approaching	Tom Rinaldo	Mar-02-07 08:57 AM	#37
- But overall, because they valued their CAREERS more than taking the MORAL and JUST stand.	ShortnFiery	Mar-02-07 01:49 PM	#47
- Think-tankitis	Donna Zen	Mar-02-07 09:29 AM	#38
- So proud of the Dems who voted Aye on Levin and Nay on IRW	Supersedeas	Mar-02-07 09:32 AM	#39
- How does the DLC play here?	formercia	Mar-02-07 11:14 AM	#40
- I provided a list.......	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 12:52 PM	#44
- Here's a list of the DLC membership	formercia	Mar-02-07 04:41 PM	#55
- Actually there are 3 on that listing that voted Yeah to Levin....	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 05:53 PM	#57
- The leadership of the DLC is connected to PNAC	formercia	Mar-02-07 06:14 PM	#58
- I know that Levin and Ted Kennedy and Wes Clark worked actively for the Levin Amendment....	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 07:33 PM	#60
- Can't have those pesky specifics	formercia	Mar-03-07 07:26 AM	#63
- because Biden-Lugar was better?	NewYorkerfromMass	Mar-02-07 01:15 PM	#45
- Provide us with the "Nutshell" of the Biden-Lugar amendment, if you please.....	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 02:20 PM	#48
- It's too tied to UN approval	sandnsea	Mar-02-07 04:18 PM	#54
- But there was nothing wrong with seeking UN approval of their own resolution.....	FrenchieCat	Mar-02-07 05:46 PM	#56
- Good point.	indie_ana_500	Mar-03-07 03:16 PM	#66

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.