You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: I reject your misinterpretation of Testor's and Webb's positions [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. I reject your misinterpretation of Testor's and Webb's positions
and of the results of the 2006 election. You are brainwashed by the corporate controlled media that insists the Democratic wave was lead by "conservative" Democrats, aka pro-corporate Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -"Hillary Clinton could be President, and Here's How" SaveElmer  Feb-19-07 10:21 AM   #0 
  - Voted for war  edwardlindy   Feb-19-07 11:01 AM   #1 
  - Three more...  SaveElmer   Feb-19-07 11:12 AM   #2 
     - I like your 3 words. Sweet  rodeodance   Feb-20-07 11:00 AM   #14 
     - Two more  knight_of_the_star   Feb-20-07 11:07 AM   #16 
     - Three more: Fooled By Bush. EOM  lojasmo   Feb-20-07 06:08 PM   #39 
  - Maybe she can win but  skipos   Feb-19-07 11:18 AM   #3 
  - Let's Hope Not  aybayb   Feb-19-07 11:31 AM   #4 
  - So who is "a GENUINE progressive Democrat?"  skipos   Feb-19-07 11:35 AM   #5 
  - GENUINE Progressive  aybayb   Feb-20-07 09:39 AM   #6 
     - politically opportunistic is a better description of Kucinich  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 09:48 AM   #8 
        - And the left expects no actual accomplishments from either of them...  SaveElmer   Feb-23-07 11:34 AM   #65 
  - I have a counter proposal. Why not let the voters decide?  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 09:44 AM   #7 
  - I don't want her, and twenty of my union brothers don't either.  Obama_for_our_future   Feb-20-07 09:50 AM   #9 
  - Hopefully, we can also elect enough progressive Dems into Congress  Larkspur   Feb-20-07 10:17 AM   #10 
  - you'll have to do better than you did in 2006  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 10:23 AM   #11 
  - Populists won the majority of seats in 2006  Larkspur   Feb-20-07 12:59 PM   #25 
     - are economic issues your defining criteria for "progressive?'  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 01:03 PM   #26 
        - The Congressional Progressive Caucus is the dominant group in the House for Dems  Larkspur   Feb-20-07 02:17 PM   #27 
           - so? How many new members did they pick up? And the demographics are trending against them in '08  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 02:35 PM   #28 
              - Man  mrgorth   Feb-20-07 03:42 PM   #30 
              - Man  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 03:46 PM   #31 
              - You're implication  mrgorth   Feb-20-07 04:28 PM   #34 
                 - sorry. You can't ignore policy positions stated on their websites.  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 06:11 PM   #42 
              - So true  Larkspur   Feb-20-07 04:00 PM   #33 
              - bull-crap Testor, like Schweitzer, ignored the DLC wimps  Larkspur   Feb-20-07 04:44 PM   #37 
                 - sorry, Lakespur, you can't ignore issue stances posted on candidate websites  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 06:10 PM   #41 
                    - bull-crap wyldwolf  Larkspur   Feb-21-07 08:31 AM   #43 
                    - do you deny the follow items:  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 09:50 AM   #45 
                       - I reject your misinterpretation of Testor's and Webb's positions  Larkspur   Feb-21-07 10:57 AM   #47 
                          - The show me how they're misrepresented other than the fact...  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 11:04 AM   #48 
                             - Thank you  Larkspur   Feb-21-07 01:01 PM   #52 
                                - yet...  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 01:13 PM   #53 
                                   - Testor's views are not from the DLC book  Larkspur   Feb-21-07 01:43 PM   #55 
                                   - on the balanced budget and abortion they most definitely are  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 01:45 PM   #56 
                                      - Testor's budget and abortion positions are populist and progressive stands  Larkspur   Feb-23-07 05:54 AM   #62 
                                         - Ha ha! Riiiight  wyldwolf   Feb-23-07 07:18 AM   #63 
                                            - My Goddess, you actually admit that Testor is a populist!!!  Larkspur   Feb-23-07 11:27 AM   #64 
                                            - hey, that was a pretty bad dodge of the topic  wyldwolf   Feb-23-07 11:40 AM   #66 
                                            - The DLC playbook is about co-opting progressive ideas and selling them as corporate ones  Larkspur   Feb-23-07 12:39 PM   #68 
                                   - That's a big break from the DLC position on guns...  benEzra   Feb-21-07 02:41 PM   #57 
                                      - did I SAY he took their position on guns?  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 02:50 PM   #58 
                                         - I took your list as being things out of the Clinton/DLC playbook..  benEzra   Feb-21-07 03:39 PM   #59 
                                            - I listed two things that are out of the DLC's playbook  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 03:57 PM   #60 
                                               - I see, my bad. (n/t)  benEzra   Feb-21-07 04:23 PM   #61 
                    - You sound like one of the New Age "Third Way" or Lieber-Dems..  Larkspur   Feb-21-07 09:39 AM   #44 
                       - you mean the ones who got the only twice elected Democrat elected in over 50 years?  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 09:51 AM   #46 
                          - The only reason Clinton won in 1992 was because Ross Perot  Larkspur   Feb-21-07 11:06 AM   #49 
                             - exit polling and electoral analysis dispute that.  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 11:08 AM   #50 
                                - Democrats lost Congress in 1994 and Bill Clinton couldn't use his rhetorical  Larkspur   Feb-21-07 12:52 PM   #51 
                                   - uh... what does that have to do with Perot?  wyldwolf   Feb-21-07 01:18 PM   #54 
  - President McCain and Vice-President Lieberman will  geek tragedy   Feb-20-07 11:35 AM   #22 
  - I think she could win the general  JNelson6563   Feb-20-07 10:23 AM   #12 
  - "we aren't the models of severe delayed reaction this cycle *ahem*)."  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 11:01 AM   #15 
     - Money's great, gotta have it  JNelson6563   Feb-20-07 11:08 AM   #17 
        - I dunno. I think Kerry looked at his budget and saw how much it would cost.  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 11:20 AM   #19 
           - Did he have some $20 million left over?  JNelson6563   Feb-20-07 02:50 PM   #29 
              - yes he did, I think. He was a little over cautious, huh?  wyldwolf   Feb-20-07 03:47 PM   #32 
  - That article seems rather overconfident...  derby378   Feb-20-07 10:48 AM   #13 
  - that is just a lie. that is not why.  mopinko   Feb-20-07 11:13 AM   #18 
  - I disagree - Hillary will not win a single Southern state...  lonehalf   Feb-20-07 11:28 AM   #20 
  - She won't win Alaska either  Blue_In_AK   Feb-20-07 11:33 AM   #21 
  - Or Iowa, Or Minnesota, or Wisconsin. Hell, she'll probably lose Illinois!  lojasmo   Feb-20-07 06:10 PM   #40 
     - Minnesotans would vote for Al Franken and John McCain. Makes sense.  oasis   Feb-23-07 11:53 AM   #67 
  - O-H-I-O. eom  geek tragedy   Feb-20-07 11:36 AM   #23 
  - it would be nice to win some southern states, but it isn't necessary  orangepeel68   Feb-20-07 12:09 PM   #24 
  - Yes, she could be President.  Kerry2008   Feb-20-07 04:30 PM   #35 
  - Buy one, get one free. Hill 'n' Bill: The package deal. (eom)  oasis   Feb-20-07 04:39 PM   #36 
  - I too think that Hillary would be a good pres; I support her or whoever is  MasonJar   Feb-20-07 05:07 PM   #38 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC