AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-10-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 10. I am glad that a light is being cast on the truth |
|
and that is HRC's 'yes' vote carries no more weight than the others and that she is NOT a war hawk and neither are the others. Dumbasses IMO yes, but, again, I prefer her straightforward discussion of it rather than the carefully-timed mea culpas which ring hollow to my ears. But that's me.
|
| -The IWR vote was a vote on whether or not to go to war no matter what Hillary says! Listen to Byrd! |
Clarkie1 |
Feb-10-07 09:32 PM |
#0 |
-
This was a vote for congress to give Bush total power with war. |
illinoisprogressive |
Feb-10-07 09:48 PM |
#1 |
 -
Yep - the Blank Check Resolution, as I (and many others) like to call it. |
kath |
Feb-10-07 11:29 PM |
#12 |
 -
That is correct -and is Byrd's ONLY complaint - that giving the decision on war or no war |
papau |
Feb-10-07 11:29 PM |
#13 |
 -
Exactly!..Byrd said at the time, the IWR resolution may have been unconstitutional. |
EndElectoral |
Feb-11-07 12:35 AM |
#15 |
 -
Exactly. And how f'ing elitist and arrogant of ANY of them to try |
Morgana LaFey |
Feb-11-07 06:53 PM |
#29 |
-
Hey - It Was Our Kids, Not Theirs |
MannyGoldstein |
Feb-10-07 09:50 PM |
#2 |
 -
Bet she would not have voted the same is Chelsea's life was on the line! nt |
Clarkie1 |
Feb-10-07 09:51 PM |
#3 |
-
I'm Not Takin' That Bet!!! n/t |
MannyGoldstein |
Feb-10-07 09:53 PM |
#4 |
-
More succinctly it was a blank check. |
AtomicKitten |
Feb-10-07 09:57 PM |
#5 |
 -
I don't think of it as a "mistake" anymore |
WesDem |
Feb-12-07 09:22 AM |
#33 |
-
Quick, forward your "discovery" to the NY Times before Sunday news deadline. |
oasis |
Feb-10-07 10:02 PM |
#6 |
-
One good thing coming from your pathetic threads... |
SaveElmer |
Feb-10-07 10:04 PM |
#7 |
 -
I am glad that a light is being cast on the truth |
AtomicKitten |
Feb-10-07 10:17 PM |
#10 |
-
Another I hate Hillary thread in less than two hours, Wow. |
A Simple Game |
Feb-10-07 10:04 PM |
#8 |
-
I agree; Important and Valid. |
snot |
Feb-10-07 10:09 PM |
#9 |
 -
I agree completely. |
invictus |
Feb-12-07 02:00 PM |
#41 |
-
Totally agree, Clarkie1 |
Carolina |
Feb-10-07 10:48 PM |
#11 |
-
If you believed in weapons inspections, you believed in the IWR. n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Feb-10-07 11:47 PM |
#14 |
 -
Maybe so....but not the Blank check one! |
FrenchieCat |
Feb-11-07 01:31 AM |
#17 |
 -
What exactly was wrong with Biden/Lugar? |
Hippo_Tron |
Feb-11-07 03:56 AM |
#19 |
 -
Hillary hypnotized Bush into kicking Hans Blix and the inspectors out. (nt) |
oasis |
Feb-11-07 10:55 AM |
#22 |
 -
"you're either with us or against us"...no other options!!!!! |
bvar22 |
Feb-11-07 05:27 PM |
#27 |
  -
Uh, no. |
LoZoccolo |
Feb-11-07 06:23 PM |
#28 |
   -
Uh, No. |
bvar22 |
Feb-11-07 10:40 PM |
#30 |
  -
that is their motto, and their total delusional thinking. |
alyce douglas |
Feb-12-07 02:31 PM |
#45 |
 -
Factually incorrect |
SOS |
Feb-12-07 09:45 AM |
#34 |
  -
No, it's just that one of the weapons inspectors that came out against the war... |
LoZoccolo |
Feb-12-07 10:56 AM |
#35 |
 -
Again |
SOS |
Feb-12-07 11:03 AM |
#36 |
 -
Right, there isn't any /requirement/. |
LoZoccolo |
Feb-12-07 11:09 AM |
#37 |
 -
The Levin amendment |
SOS |
Feb-12-07 12:00 PM |
#38 |
 -
And if you had knowledge that Powell lied to the U.N., you had time to demand a new vote/debate. |
Dr Fate |
Feb-12-07 02:23 PM |
#44 |
-
This really galls me! |
gulfcoastliberal |
Feb-12-07 08:18 PM |
#53 |
-
It was the resolution CLARK recommended |
sandnsea |
Feb-11-07 01:29 AM |
#16 |
 -
What was a resolution that Clark recommended? |
FrenchieCat |
Feb-11-07 01:39 AM |
#18 |
-
Gee, maybe the senate dems should've used their power to push through Levin and Biden-Lugar |
Hippo_Tron |
Feb-11-07 04:02 AM |
#20 |
-
Naked "slash and burn" on Democratic candidates ..... |
Trajan |
Feb-11-07 04:02 AM |
#21 |
-
Robert Byrd made it exceptionally clear |
Pithy Cherub |
Feb-11-07 12:09 PM |
#23 |
-
And a secret war with Iran has already begun... |
EVDebs |
Feb-11-07 12:39 PM |
#24 |
-
What did these Democrats know that Hillary did not know? |
bvar22 |
Feb-11-07 01:17 PM |
#25 |
 -
Hillary and they ALL knew at the time. |
xkenx |
Feb-11-07 11:02 PM |
#31 |
-
Simple, it was the worst vote in Congress in decades. No problem forgiving the offenders, |
Tom Joad |
Feb-11-07 01:43 PM |
#26 |
 -
Right! Imagine HRC vs. Hagel in '08. Who was more against the war, the decorated Viet Nam vet, or |
xkenx |
Feb-12-07 08:47 AM |
#32 |
-
Hagel voted "yes" on the IWR also.... |
paulk |
Feb-12-07 12:27 PM |
#40 |
-
I know, but he turned on Bush long ago re Iraq, very publicly. |
xkenx |
Feb-12-07 04:15 PM |
#46 |
-
how did he turn on Bush? Sure, he's said a few things |
paulk |
Feb-12-07 04:33 PM |
#48 |
-
The point is voter perception. |
xkenx |
Feb-12-07 08:23 PM |
#54 |
-
that's nonsense. |
paulk |
Feb-13-07 12:16 PM |
#55 |
-
I was talking about voter psychology, which IS important. |
xkenx |
Feb-13-07 05:01 PM |
#56 |
-
That covers also the "oops, I sponso...voted for it, my bad" Edwards then |
The Count |
Feb-12-07 12:21 PM |
#39 |
 -
True- but Edwards is at least smart enough to admit it was a mistake. |
Dr Fate |
Feb-12-07 02:07 PM |
#42 |
-
Everyone in the USA except DLCers knows that "yes" means "yes." |
Dr Fate |
Feb-12-07 02:15 PM |
#43 |
 -
Not entirely fair to cast it all on the DLC |
Hippo_Tron |
Feb-12-07 06:05 PM |
#50 |
-
I should have said "most conservative Democrats" then. |
Dr Fate |
Feb-12-07 07:46 PM |
#51 |
-
Alternately, just READ THE RESOLUTION'S TITLE. |
Zhade |
Feb-12-07 04:25 PM |
#47 |
 -
Nothing. Nothing vague about the words "yay" or "nay" either. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Feb-12-07 07:47 PM |
#52 |
-
Since it's too late for a rec, I'll kick it instead |
Hardhead |
Feb-12-07 05:59 PM |
#49 |