You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Joe Lieberman's coverup for BushInc on Katrina - is anyone surprised [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 03:54 PM
Original message
Joe Lieberman's coverup for BushInc on Katrina - is anyone surprised
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 03:56 PM by blm
that he would do this? Anyone think he acts alone here?

There are enough coverup Democrats in our party who will support and protect Joe every step of the way even when he is actively supporting and protecting BushInc. Many of those same people want us to not examine and investigate the leadup to the Iraq war, even though the revelations could prevent a similar future leadup.

That protection of BushInc goes back over 40 years and didn't start with Joe and won't end with Joe - Joe is just one actor getting the attention for it at this point.

It's up to the rest of us Democrats to work to expose, weaken, and STOP that wing of the party that harbors the coverup Democrats.

Our democracy is too fragile at this point in history to allow the continuation of secrecy and privilege that is eating away at this nation.

It's past time that truth matters to our party and to our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Joe Lieberman's coverup for BushInc on Katrina - is anyone surprised blm  Jan-12-07 03:54 PM   #0 
  - Makes me ill. We should all be writing to Reid expressing our outrage. nt  babylonsister   Jan-12-07 03:57 PM   #1 
  - I already did.  fooj   Jan-12-07 03:59 PM   #4 
  - i will do that right now. a short ground letter  rodeodance   Jan-12-07 04:05 PM   #5 
  - I'm in.  fooj   Jan-12-07 03:58 PM   #2 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-12-07 03:59 PM   #3 
  - This is an outrage for us on the Gulf Coast--he's backing off impeachable offenses IMO  rudy23   Jan-12-07 04:09 PM   #6 
     - You just made a VERY SHARP observation.  blm   Jan-12-07 04:12 PM   #8 
     - There is no doubt that Joe has once and for all sold his soul in this deal.  Kurovski   Jan-12-07 04:20 PM   #12 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-12-07 07:00 PM   #21 
           - Cut, and print.  Kurovski   Jan-13-07 01:21 PM   #26 
  - Which committee is in charge on the House side?  hedda_foil   Jan-12-07 04:12 PM   #7 
  - Excellent idea.  fooj   Jan-12-07 04:14 PM   #10 
  - Excellent Point  Robson   Jan-12-07 04:20 PM   #13 
  - Of course, but we can count on the coverup Democrats to downplay  blm   Jan-12-07 04:24 PM   #14 
  - Payback for their $$$ in his election  MidwestTransplant   Jan-12-07 04:13 PM   #9 
  - He is also running for McCain's VP  MidwestTransplant   Jan-12-07 04:16 PM   #11 
     - That's what I've been thinking for some time now.  blm   Jan-12-07 05:27 PM   #17 
        - As much of a lapdog he's become for Bush.. are you kidding me !?!?!?  larissa   Jan-12-07 06:53 PM   #20 
           - I disagree, because Israel had a breakaway center party that spurned far right  blm   Jan-14-07 09:56 AM   #27 
              - The difference is that Israel has a proportional-representation system  LeftishBrit   Jan-14-07 09:59 AM   #28 
                 - True, but I think the center-right will have most US media making up any lag for them.  blm   Jan-14-07 11:00 AM   #29 
  - Surprised? Hardly! Let's not forget that with a chance to pick up a Senate seat  FiveGoodMen   Jan-12-07 04:32 PM   #15 
  - He's down with the Bushes and the Clintons - and the PNAC crowd - so whassup?  blm   Jan-14-07 07:03 PM   #32 
  - No longer "Joementum" - Now "Quid Pro Joe", the traitor  Tin Man   Jan-12-07 05:00 PM   #16 
  - Quid Pro Joe is apt. And there are too many more protecting him, too.  blm   Jan-12-07 06:17 PM   #18 
  - Time for Dems to twist the screws on Joe.  ReadTomPaine   Jan-12-07 06:28 PM   #19 
  - I bet good ol' Ned Lamont is  zidzi   Jan-12-07 07:10 PM   #22 
  - Sickens me how Dem establishment supported Joe over the Dem candidate.  blm   Jan-14-07 01:37 PM   #30 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-12-07 07:38 PM   #23 
  - Joe's been bought and sold - bigtime. This means he's BLACKMAILABLE!  TankLV   Jan-13-07 01:28 AM   #24 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-13-07 10:49 AM   #25 
  - Mary Landrieu  depakid   Jan-14-07 02:50 PM   #31 
  - You post all the time about "coverup Democrats". Just who are these people?  mtnsnake   Jan-14-07 09:51 PM   #33 
  - Who made you God of media credibility? Are you going to make a list of blogs you accept?  madfloridian   Jan-15-07 01:16 AM   #34 
     - Unless you are also blm, I don't understand why you answered  mtnsnake   Jan-15-07 08:37 AM   #35 
  - do you have any proof that he didn't act alone?  paulk   Jan-15-07 12:58 PM   #36 
  - Perhaps it's time for CT to look into enacting recall legislation. n/t  Norquist Nemesis   Jan-15-07 01:08 PM   #37 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC