You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: Let me spell it out for you... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-15-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Let me spell it out for you...
E-X-I-T. Exit. As in "not endless occupation." The rest is detail. But we do all agree on the objective.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Do you think it is important that Democrats are united behind one Democratic Plan for Iraq? Clarkie1  Dec-15-06 08:12 PM   #0 
  - So far my answer to the question is winning big time...nt  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 08:16 PM   #1 
  - Just goes to show  BeFree   Dec-15-06 09:43 PM   #21 
  - Not! Getting behind one plan ( Patriotic Cooperation ) has made Impeachment  orpupilofnature57   Dec-15-06 08:18 PM   #2 
  - I think there are some general principles Dems can agree on.  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 08:20 PM   #4 
     - Oh positively ,but one plan isn't necessary to realize the same goal..  orpupilofnature57   Dec-15-06 08:24 PM   #7 
     - I don't know any Democrat that disagrees on that  karynnj   Dec-16-06 07:43 AM   #36 
  - Though apparently not popular, I think its somewhat important.  lvx35   Dec-15-06 08:19 PM   #3 
  - I agree. Disorganization is a liability come election time.  AZBlue   Dec-15-06 08:51 PM   #11 
  - d) impossible for democrats to unite behind one of anything. nt.  Warren Stupidity   Dec-15-06 08:23 PM   #5 
  - I disagree...  rucky   Dec-16-06 09:56 AM   #38 
  - Also not popular....  monktonman   Dec-15-06 08:24 PM   #6 
  - I am of the opinion Democrats should endorse the ISG recommendations.  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 08:31 PM   #8 
  - Bush is going to stick it to the Democrats on the ISG  IndianaGreen   Dec-15-06 09:23 PM   #14 
  - Because it's Getting behind something so important ,instead of Examining  orpupilofnature57   Dec-15-06 08:50 PM   #10 
  - I though the President was suppose to come up with the plan.  augie38   Dec-15-06 08:48 PM   #9 
  - He's Ted Knight's grandson in 'Caddy Shack'  orpupilofnature57   Dec-15-06 09:04 PM   #12 
  - The only plan that counts is the one that will bring all the troops home ASAP  IndianaGreen   Dec-15-06 09:18 PM   #13 
  - What does ASAP mean to you?  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 09:25 PM   #15 
     - As soon as it is logistically possible to do so... leaving all the equipment behind  IndianaGreen   Dec-15-06 09:33 PM   #18 
        - Well, that's not going to happen for at least two years.  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 09:50 PM   #25 
           - We will be evacuating the Green Zone by chopper before the end of 2007  IndianaGreen   Dec-15-06 10:41 PM   #29 
  - VERY important.  rucky   Dec-15-06 09:26 PM   #16 
  - I reject your premise. We ARE united behind one plan.  ClassWarrior   Dec-15-06 09:32 PM   #17 
  - What does that mean?  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 09:36 PM   #19 
     - Let me spell it out for you...  ClassWarrior   Dec-15-06 09:45 PM   #22 
        - O.K., then that would mean no permanent bases or other military presence. nt  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 09:49 PM   #24 
  - getting the policy right is what's important ...  welshTerrier2   Dec-15-06 09:39 PM   #20 
  - Unfortunately for the next two years it's the administration that needs to "get the policy right"  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 09:46 PM   #23 
     - well, yes ... and no ...  welshTerrier2   Dec-15-06 09:57 PM   #26 
     - But Democrats are not going to agree on a specific policy.  Clarkie1   Dec-15-06 11:06 PM   #32 
        - the ISG? no thanks ...  welshTerrier2   Dec-16-06 07:17 AM   #33 
     - But you know who will be blamed for future failures, dontcha?  rucky   Dec-16-06 09:51 AM   #37 
  - It depends on the plan...  zulchzulu   Dec-15-06 09:59 PM   #27 
  - I think once we have a nominee, it'd help for other Democrats in the public eye  Sparkly   Dec-15-06 10:04 PM   #28 
  - not important....  unkachuck   Dec-15-06 10:42 PM   #30 
  - No.  Crunchy Frog   Dec-15-06 11:04 PM   #31 
  - There is no one plan anyone can agree upon...  kentuck   Dec-16-06 07:28 AM   #34 
  - This is not possible  karynnj   Dec-16-06 07:41 AM   #35 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC