Reply #63: Since you were anticipating an instructive reply....

[mtnsnake]

let me try once again.

I made a positive response to the OP by stating that we had the votes to do something about it (impeachment, since that was what the OPer asked about).

You then commented that you'd like to know upon what basis I made that statement, which implied that perhaps you didn't realize that it only takes the House a one vote majority to impeach.

I then informed you that it only takes a one vote majority to impeach.

You then replied with a snarky message, "Have I offended thee", trying to make like I was talking about conviction, when it was perfectly clear all along that I wasn't.

You then replied with another post, implying that I had never answered your question as to what I based my statement on that we have the votes to impeach, spinning it like you NOW meant that you were talking about conviction, when we both know that wasn't the case of what you asked me in your initial post.

And in future, msnsnake, I will avoid troubling you any further

That's fine, but in the future you can save everyone a lot of time by simply admitting your initial mistake, which would eliminate the need for subsequent tiring analysis of you-said/I-said.