You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: No, the question is: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, the question is:
Why isn't Hillary Clinton supporting Kerry-Feingold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Kerry: Bush assurances on Iraq a blunder ProSense  Oct-17-06 05:24 PM   #0 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-17-06 05:26 PM   #1 
  - Our government is less ethical when unqualified and callow morons are  Old Crusoe   Oct-17-06 05:41 PM   #6 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-17-06 06:39 PM   #9 
  - Mr. Kerry the question is what will happen after the elections??  Imagevision   Oct-17-06 05:29 PM   #2 
  - No, the question is:  ProSense   Oct-17-06 05:32 PM   #3 
  - I imagine he'll open the books on BushInc and let the chips fall where  blm   Oct-17-06 06:25 PM   #8 
  - Two presidents are impugned under Kerry's accusation here.  Old Crusoe   Oct-17-06 05:35 PM   #4 
  - No kidding - You could replace the top 10 people in Bush administration  blm   Oct-18-06 08:01 AM   #33 
     - Absolutely. And the 4 you named would make a terrific team.  Old Crusoe   Oct-18-06 09:00 AM   #34 
  - I agree, it was an incredibly stupid thing to say, even for bush*  globalvillage   Oct-17-06 05:37 PM   #5 
  - I used to say  sandnsea   Oct-17-06 06:14 PM   #7 
  - after he voted for it he's now leading a movement against it  AtomicKitten   Oct-17-06 07:05 PM   #10 
     - I don't know what your problem is  sandnsea   Oct-17-06 07:18 PM   #11 
     - Well, I know what your problem is.  AtomicKitten   Oct-17-06 07:20 PM   #12 
        - You've made your point clear - several times  partisan   Oct-17-06 07:29 PM   #13 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-17-06 07:33 PM   #14 
              - Because you aren't eviscerating Kerry on at least 3 threads right now  WildEyedLiberal   Oct-17-06 07:37 PM   #15 
              - not Kerry, silly  AtomicKitten   Oct-17-06 07:41 PM   #16 
                 - Anti-war! LOL! n/t  ProSense   Oct-17-06 07:47 PM   #18 
                 - Cute. You attack Kerry even as you say you are not  WildEyedLiberal   Oct-17-06 07:48 PM   #19 
                    - you know what's really funny?  AtomicKitten   Oct-17-06 07:53 PM   #21 
                       - You know what's even funnier?  WildEyedLiberal   Oct-17-06 07:57 PM   #22 
                       - I hope you are rooting for Hill, because this poll shows that Edwards  Mass   Oct-17-06 08:01 PM   #25 
                       - The difference is not significant  karynnj   Oct-17-06 08:51 PM   #27 
                       - Kerry always grows stronger in the polls as DEBATES go on. All those blank  blm   Oct-18-06 07:52 AM   #30 
              - Then don't read these posts if they bother you so much  tavalon   Oct-17-06 09:58 PM   #29 
                 - thanks for the advice  AtomicKitten   Oct-18-06 11:22 AM   #37 
                    - Nope, you don't need to get over it  tavalon   Oct-18-06 02:35 PM   #47 
     - That would rule out Clinton and Gore  ProSense   Oct-17-06 07:46 PM   #17 
     - Al Gore was against the Iraq War from the get-go.  AtomicKitten   Oct-17-06 07:51 PM   #20 
        - Al Gore suggested that Congress put forth a resolution  ProSense   Oct-17-06 07:58 PM   #23 
        - Guess you never read Gore's speech about what HE would put in the IWR  blm   Oct-18-06 07:53 AM   #31 
        - That's not true, he was not against it in the way Ted Kennedy was  TayTay   Oct-18-06 09:14 AM   #35 
     - You SHOULD want someone who is capable of crafting a withdrawal plan.  blm   Oct-18-06 07:58 AM   #32 
        - You SHOULD hold Kerry accountable for his "yes" vote on the IWR  AtomicKitten   Oct-18-06 11:19 AM   #36 
           - You would be wrong - I believe presidents should have threat of force  blm   Oct-18-06 11:46 AM   #38 
              - no, you would be rationalizing again  AtomicKitten   Oct-18-06 11:52 AM   #39 
                 - Letting Bush off the hook for violating IWR - enjoy that stance. Rove did  blm   Oct-18-06 12:07 PM   #41 
                    - oh he violated it -- but that doesn't exonerate those  AtomicKitten   Oct-18-06 12:10 PM   #44 
                       - That doesn't make any sense!  ProSense   Oct-18-06 12:29 PM   #45 
                       - If IWR took us to war that would have some merit. It didn't, so it doesn't  blm   Oct-18-06 12:42 PM   #46 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-17-06 08:01 PM   #24 
  - You keep saying that! n/t  ProSense   Oct-17-06 08:03 PM   #26 
  - And yet, you so obviously don't  WildEyedLiberal   Oct-17-06 09:14 PM   #28 
  - A plea - Do not feed the Kerry bashers.  Mass   Oct-18-06 12:03 PM   #40 
     - advice from  AtomicKitten   Oct-18-06 12:09 PM   #42 
        - LOL - whatever.  Mass   Oct-18-06 12:10 PM   #43 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC